URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 86085--------------------------------------------------
       High Tackles
   DIR By: The Quin of England
       Date: March 9, 2022, 11:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       High tackles are illegal due to the obvious dangers to the head,
       however, conversely shouldn't dropping the shoulder and
       crouching as you approach being tackled also be illegal?
       What kind of game is this turning into?
       #Post#: 86086--------------------------------------------------
       Re: High Tackles
   DIR By: Brown Bottle
       Date: March 9, 2022, 12:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: The Quin of England link ---
       >
       > High tackles are illegal due to the obvious dangers to the
       head, however, conversely shouldn't dropping the shoulder and
       crouching as you approach being tackled also be illegal?
       >
       > What kind of game is this turning into?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I'm more concerned about what sort of game you'd like to turn it
       into.
       #Post#: 86087--------------------------------------------------
       Re: High Tackles
   DIR By: MaidstoneQuin
       Date: March 9, 2022, 12:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       With all the concussion/head injuries and the press it gets with
       the likes of Steve Thompson it feels refs sometimes are over
       compensating and making up for things before that would be
       ignored, just because the head is involved. I’m also not
       downplaying refs wanting to prevent serious injury, as that is
       correct.
       Personally I feel the VDW red was harsh as it was a poor tackle
       technique, and a yellow would of been more sufficient. I can’t
       help but wonder if some players will look to exploit any
       potential head contact in an effort to help turn the game in
       their favour
       #Post#: 86088--------------------------------------------------
       Re: High Tackles
   DIR By: Brown Bottle
       Date: March 9, 2022, 12:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Who's VDW?
       #Post#: 86089--------------------------------------------------
       Re: High Tackles
   DIR By: MaidstoneQuin
       Date: March 9, 2022, 12:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Brown Bottle link ---
       >
       > Who's VDW?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Was referencing duhan van der merwe
       #Post#: 86091--------------------------------------------------
       Re: High Tackles
   DIR By: Nico Wilson
       Date: March 9, 2022, 3:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Brown Bottle link ---
       >
       > Who's VDW?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Very Dear Wife
       #Post#: 86092--------------------------------------------------
       Re: High Tackles
   DIR By: D-Quins
       Date: March 9, 2022, 3:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It is the poor tackle technique they are trying to remove from
       the game.  They want people low and that is why if you start low
       but the tackled player significantly lowers their height then
       you will not be getting a Red card.  As in the other day can't
       remember which Prem game but the tackler was 90 degrees at the
       waist and due to tackled player lowering their height
       significantly there was significant head contact, outcome rugby
       incident not card at all, if there had not been players very low
       then it would have been Red.
       How often do we see card for taking he catcher out in the air
       these days, not often I would say.  When first introduced there
       were lots of cards, people have changed how they jump in the
       most part.  That is what they are trying to achieve in the
       tackle, hopefully we get there
       #Post#: 86093--------------------------------------------------
       Re: High Tackles
   DIR By: Mayor West
       Date: March 9, 2022, 3:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       When you take contact you have to go in low or you will be held
       up and choke tackled. Remove the choke tackle/held up in the
       maul rule and there is less reason to bend double into a
       collision.
       #Post#: 86099--------------------------------------------------
       Re: High Tackles
   DIR By: Brown Bottle
       Date: March 9, 2022, 5:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: MaidstoneQuin link ---
       >
       > Was referencing duhan van der merwe
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       So the tackle on him which he defended by smacking the tackler
       in the face with his forearm?
       #Post#: 86108--------------------------------------------------
       Re: High Tackles
   DIR By: JammyGit
       Date: March 10, 2022, 2:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Mayor West link ---
       >
       > When you take contact you have to go in low or you will be
       held up and choke tackled. Remove the choke tackle/held up in
       the maul rule and there is less reason to bend double into a
       collision.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       You're more likely to get smashed backwards if you're upright.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 4
   DIR Next Page