URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 64148--------------------------------------------------
       Re: What happened after Gustard?
   DIR By: Kermitpower
       Date: April 22, 2021, 3:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Whilst the tries scored for/against make for interesting
       reading, it would be really handy to know how many of the tries
       conceded in each of the three segments were conceded with the
       game already won.
       The Wuss game is a good microcosm for that, I think.
       Their first two tries were conceded in a flat-out, frenetic
       period of open play where it never felt as though they were ever
       going to get on top of us, and that the players trusted
       themselves to beat any team out there in that sort of game, but
       the reality is that there are still teams out there who can beat
       us, or at least stay with us long enough for fatigue to kick in,
       letting their natural game take over.
       The Chiefs game fitted that mould for me.  Their second two, on
       the other hand, were scored well after we'd put the game to bed
       and brought on some of the less experienced players off the
       bench to gain some valuable game time.
       I don't think we should be too worried about the second
       scenario, but it would of course still be nice to close those
       out as well.
       #Post#: 64149--------------------------------------------------
       Re: What happened after Gustard?
   DIR By: Fearless Fred
       Date: April 22, 2021, 3:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Brown Bottle link ---
       >
       > Indeed. It's the backups that we struggle with.
       >
       > I think NEv's were Jarvis, Clegg and Botica. Any I've missed?
       They were certainly a step down on the whole.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Swiel, Malone,& Luveniyali
       #Post#: 64152--------------------------------------------------
       Re: What happened after Gustard?
   DIR By: HamptonCourtJester
       Date: April 22, 2021, 4:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Echoing what QC said, the line-out for me has been one of the
       defining factors in the last 3 months. I think I had honestly
       just grown in to a position where I just believed/accepted that
       we were going to lose any line-out and then have to start again.
       Am very sad that Baldwin is going. Not meaning to belittle any
       of the playing staff remaining (and I dont know of any incoming
       hookers other than the rumours), but he has been pivotal.
       In a similar fashion across the pitch though, the free way we
       are playing, and the decisions we are making, means that we're
       not immediately putting ourselves under pressure from being in a
       position of possession, in other phases of the game. Our scrums
       have been tremendous, our kicks gauged and successful (Not all
       the time but hey its an upward turn :). Losing possession and
       giving up monumental amounts of penalties, the way we used to,
       from being in a position of possession/lineout/territory/gain
       etc etc was one of the most irritating things for me. A
       thoroughly deflating way to watch Rugby.
       A beautiful winter and early spring. Bring on the ballots :)
       #Post#: 64161--------------------------------------------------
       Re: What happened after Gustard?
   DIR By: T-Bone
       Date: April 22, 2021, 5:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Comet link ---
       >
       > I agree QC. I think Gussy had a sense of the club's style (he
       spoke about the Quins DNA quite a lot, particularly in the last
       few months) but couldn't or wouldn't allow the players to
       deviate from his more controlled vision. I also agree that the
       signings were very good in the main.
       >
       > It is a shame that he made enemies and that he is spoken about
       as some sort of pariah or 'he who must not be named'. While I
       understand that and some players (like Browny) might have a
       legitimate beef, I do still think he was a good bloke trying to
       do right by the club.
       >
       > Since he left, the leading players and the coaches have
       promoted bravery over caution, which has shifted our mentality
       into being more confident. The next step is to continue to be
       confident and back our attacking style in the last 10 minutes of
       games. Irish will be a great test of this as they don't go
       away!!!
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       He may have spoken a lot about the Quins "DNA" or style, but I'm
       not sure he actually ever believed it. It's a nice soundbite to
       keep the fans happy but wasn't really reflected in what we were
       seeing on the pitch
       #Post#: 64162--------------------------------------------------
       Re: What happened after Gustard?
   DIR By: MadMax
       Date: April 22, 2021, 5:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What happened after Gustard? We had a (socially distanced)
       party!
       #Post#: 64165--------------------------------------------------
       Re: What happened after Gustard?
   DIR By: Brown Bottle
       Date: April 22, 2021, 6:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Fearless Fred link ---
       >
       > Swiel, Malone,& Luveniyali
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Ta. Swiel certainly stepped up in his first season as an
       "emergency" signing. Sadly didn't work out afterwards.
       #Post#: 64167--------------------------------------------------
       Re: What happened after Gustard?
   DIR By: T-Bone
       Date: April 22, 2021, 6:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Brown Bottle link ---
       >
       > Ta. Swiel certainly stepped up in his first season as an
       "emergency" signing. Sadly didn't work out afterwards.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Urdapilleta was another who never got a crack but seems to have
       gone on to have a solid, if not spectacular, career
       #Post#: 64168--------------------------------------------------
       Re: What happened after Gustard?
   DIR By: Fearless Fred
       Date: April 22, 2021, 6:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Brown Bottle link ---
       >
       > Ta. Swiel certainly stepped up in his first season as an
       "emergency" signing. Sadly didn't work out afterwards.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I think Swiel was doubly unlucky. In his two favoured positions
       he was behind NEv & Browny who would always be picked first if
       fit.
       #Post#: 64169--------------------------------------------------
       Re: What happened after Gustard?
   DIR By: Guildford Quin
       Date: April 22, 2021, 7:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think we're also far more clinical in attack than under
       Gustard. Our points per visit to the 22 must have massively
       improved. I remember how frustrating it was to constantly see
       knock-ons, turnovers and forward passes near the opposition
       line. The players seem to have confidence in their ability and
       more patience now.
       #Post#: 64170--------------------------------------------------
       Re: What happened after Gustard?
   DIR By: poorfour
       Date: April 22, 2021, 7:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Neil Quinnock link ---
       >
       > I think we're also far more clinical in attack than under
       Gustard. Our points per visit to the 22 must have massively
       improved. I remember how frustrating it was to constantly see
       knock-ons, turnovers and forward passes near the opposition
       line. The players seem to have confidence in their ability and
       more patience now.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Not so sure about that. Against Wuss we created about twice as
       many as we scored, only to knock on, forward pass or generally
       throw it away, and I think that’s been the general pattern. But
       we are creating so many that some of them are bound to stick.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 4
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page