URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 62457--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A French Botica moment
   DIR By: stoop2conquer
       Date: March 27, 2021, 7:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Agree - blows to throat area are potentially lethal eg
       Catrakellis  - a horrible moment live.
       #Post#: 62462--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A French Botica moment
   DIR By: Bolly-Quin
       Date: March 27, 2021, 8:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Brown Bottle link ---
       >
       > Really? Looked straight on throat with forearm  to me.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I'm pretty sure it hit his upper shoulder first and then slid up
       or that one part hit his shoulder and another his throat at the
       same time, but it was high enough that it was bound to be a
       problem - on balance a red, but my point was mainly that it was
       the TMO's call that there was no mitigation, not Barnes -
       perhaps I should have stressed that. I expected a red bearing in
       mind how these things are presently interpreted and policed.
       #Post#: 62743--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A French Botica moment
   DIR By: Brown Bottle
       Date: March 30, 2021, 6:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Bolly-Quin link ---
       >
       > I'm pretty sure it hit his upper shoulder first and then slid
       up or that one part hit his shoulder and another his throat at
       the same time, but it was high enough that it was bound to be a
       problem - on balance a red, but my point was mainly that it was
       the TMO's call that there was no mitigation, not Barnes -
       perhaps I should have stressed that. I expected a red bearing in
       mind how these things are presently interpreted and policed.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Bit sad I know but I had another look. Your second
       interpretation looks right - elbow to shoulder at the same time
       as forearm to throat.
       But the call was made by Barnes and frankly there was no
       mitigation anyway. Barnes just confirmed his view with the TMO.
       To be honest, I think the ref trump's the TMO  although I could
       be wrong.
       And he just got a 6 week ban, reduced to 3 for the usual
       reasons. If Barnes had given him a yellow it would have been a
       clear error.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page