URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 55202--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending 5m lineout mauls
   DIR By: quinalan
       Date: December 21, 2020, 4:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Can anyone actually stop an Exeter/Racing 92 maul from a 5m
       lineout? It seems impossible once these two sides get it set &
       start moving.
       #Post#: 55204--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending 5m lineout mauls
   DIR By: Quinston Churchill
       Date: December 21, 2020, 4:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Indeed. A well constructed maul is very difficult, nigh on
       impossible to stop legally and certain teams (Exeter in
       particular), have it down to a fine art.
       The problem is, we don’t seem to be capable of defending any
       lineout drives. Our maul defence really is quite pathetic, even
       teams who aren’t particularly good at it know that they have a
       decent chance of scoring against us if they kick to the corner.
       On the coaches, Flannery does seem to have improved our maul in
       attack. I don’t have the numbers, but my perception is that
       we’ve been converting a higher percentage of tries from our
       catch-and-drive set-ups than we were prior to his arrival. That
       is a positive. However, not to the extent that it excuses the
       maul defence.
       Sanderson’s observations were interesting and correct, but we
       also don’t seem very good at disrupting (legally). Players like
       Launchbury and Itoje are excellent at coming through the maul to
       get on to the ball. Maybe we need to look at different ways to
       tackle it, because the current methods really aren’t working.
       One tactic I have noticed a couple of times from Wilco Louw is
       that he immediately tries to sack the maul by rolling the jumper
       immediately as he lands. Not a bad idea in theory, but I’m yet
       to see him time it right which means he’s on the floor and out
       of the game or the opposition are tripping over him and we’re
       conceding a penalty. For once, there is actually good footage of
       him doing this ... if anyone can bear to watch again, look at
       the lineout leading to Teddy Thomas’ try. I’m not sure if it’s
       tactical or just Louw going with what he knows, but it sure
       isn’t working right now.
       #Post#: 55205--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending 5m lineout mauls
   DIR By: Simquin
       Date: December 21, 2020, 5:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I remember one such lineout where we didn't compete nor join the
       maul putting most of the oppo  pack offside. Ref awarded a
       penalty in favour of Quins.
       Has this law/tactic been removed? Unsporting contact etc like
       O'Shea's Italian tactic?
       #Post#: 55211--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending 5m lineout mauls
   DIR By: Quinten Poulsen
       Date: December 22, 2020, 2:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: PhilQuin2 link ---
       >
       > Could it be that Sarries ARE great at this sort of thing, and
       the reason is Sanderson himself..?
       > As Mayor West says, sign him up!
       >
       > At the same time, the question is begged re: what this new
       bloke Flannery is contributing; can't say I've seen a tangible
       improvement since he joined us..?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I think the lineout is comfortably more reliable than it was
       before he arrived. Mind you, that may be just down to Baldwin
       having had the vast majority of game time out of our hookers.
       #Post#: 55213--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending 5m lineout mauls
   DIR By: J Scott
       Date: December 22, 2020, 3:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I agree our has been more consistent and Baldwin is turning out
       to be a good signing his all round game has been pretty good.
       I’m not sure about Elia he’s good in the loose but his tight
       work and throwing is a real weakness not good for a hooker.
       We need to compete at line outs for two reasons, pressure their
       throw and refs won’t give the marginal not straights if we
       don’t.
       #Post#: 55226--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending 5m lineout mauls
   DIR By: JammyGit
       Date: December 22, 2020, 12:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: PhilQuin2 link ---
       >
       > Could it be that Sarries ARE great at this sort of thing, and
       the reason is Sanderson himself..?
       > As Mayor West says, sign him up!
       >
       > At the same time, the question is begged re: what this new
       bloke Flannery is contributing; can't say I've seen a tangible
       improvement since he joined us..?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Stick Mako Vunipola, Jamie George, Maro Itoje, Billy Vunipola in
       our pack and I bet Flannery would have us defending mauls like
       no-one else.
       #Post#: 55262--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending 5m lineout mauls
   DIR By: DOK
       Date: December 23, 2020, 4:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That's true, but people like Maro have a great technique for
       disrupting mauls. I mean long arms and the muscles and all, but
       more importantly they get in the places where they can really
       cause problems. My memories of our maul disruption this season
       was that one against Exeter where we all bound on, formed a
       wedge, drove beautifully into the maul only to discover Exeter
       had rolled it round and while we peeled off a couple of hangers
       on at the side they stepped over our try line more or less
       unopposed.
       #Post#: 55267--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending 5m lineout mauls
   DIR By: JammyGit
       Date: December 23, 2020, 5:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Agreed - but he's been like that since he came on the scene. I
       don't think you can divorce his natural gifts from his
       technique.
       #Post#: 55268--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defending 5m lineout mauls
   DIR By: DOK
       Date: December 23, 2020, 6:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes, but John Kingston took an underpowered scrum and taught
       them both how to do a rolling maul (you all remember the RMTB?)
       (Rolling maul, thing of beauty) and how to defend against
       rolling mauls. So I wonder if it's because the laws have changed
       since his day as scrum coach or whether it's just something Adam
       Jones cannot get over to our team.
       Going back to that maul against Exeter, it was well drilled,
       they formed up beautifully then charged blindly into the wrong
       part of the maul! I had assumed as the season went on we were
       going to improve on that last part and finally have a decent
       maul defence, but I'm still waiting.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page