URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 40038--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 6 nations to go behind paywall
   DIR By: Monte
       Date: March 6, 2020, 8:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well maybe it can be put on the A list. A joke that Grand
       National and not the Gold Cup is on that list but luckily a lot
       of racing on ITV.
       #Post#: 40041--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 6 nations to go behind paywall
   DIR By: Fearless Fred
       Date: March 6, 2020, 8:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It amazes me that the RL Challenge Cup final is on the A list,
       but the 6 Nations isn't, to be honest.
       #Post#: 40055--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 6 nations to go behind paywall
   DIR By: Hellequin
       Date: March 6, 2020, 4:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't think the 6 Nations would actually be worth that much to
       a commercial broadcasting company. Who would actually pay a
       decent amount to cover the whole tournament? France Vs Italy
       negligible, the Celtic Nations playing each other probably not
       great. Only big draw would be Vs England similar to Sky's deal
       for the other International matches.
       The ideal model for me of it did go commercial would be the F1
       model with a dedicated channel covering all of the major events
       in detail, including worldwide and feeder series. With in depth
       analysis by actual experts not just poetry readings and the same
       old commentary every year.
       I already watch rugby on BT SPORT and Sky most weeks so wouldn't
       make much difference to me.
       On Cricket I was a season ticket holder at Middlesex for 2
       years. T20 was by far the most popular at the ground, quite
       often sell outs and covered on Sky cricket nightly from across
       the country. One dayers quiet on weekdays crowded at weekends
       and some covered on Sky. Championship matches basically empty
       except for members over 70 and school children on a day out,
       only included on sky sports news once an hour. Even on the last
       day of the season with Middlesex winning the Championship
       probably a lower turnout than a League 2 football match.
       #Post#: 40190--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 6 nations to go behind paywall
   DIR By: Monte
       Date: March 8, 2020, 9:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       From the Sun Tel 1 match a week free to air what a joke
  HTML https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2020/03/07/private-equity-tries-make-rugby-lucrative-global-game/
       #Post#: 40260--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 6 nations to go behind paywall
   DIR By: DOK
       Date: March 8, 2020, 1:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Private equity tries to make rugby a lucrative global game
       Private equity firm CVC is revolutionising rugby as it seeks to
       emulate American football's commercial success
       By
       Christopher Williams,
       SUNDAY TELEGRAPH BUSINESS EDITOR
       7 March 2020 • 4:00pm
       The coming campaign of breakneck professionalisation is likely
       to be dizzying for many of rugby's traditional fans.
       When Saracens run out in rugby’s second tier next season, the
       north-west London club’s squad of international stars must be
       careful not to stumble on a tree root.
       At Dillingham Park, Bedfordshire, home to Ampthill RUFC, the
       only way to reach the pitch from the spartan clubhouse is to
       pick a muddy path through a silver birch wood.
       Many more indignities await Saracens following their relegation
       by Premiership Rugby for persistent breaches of the top flight’s
       player salary cap. The scandal means one of club rugby’s richest
       teams will clash with relative paupers such as Ampthill at the
       same time as the sport itself is tackling its own troubled
       relationship with money.
       “We’re really on day one of this journey,” says Darren Childs,
       chief executive of Premiership Rugby and the man under pressure
       to deliver nothing short of a financial revolution in English
       club rugby on behalf of team owners and their new business
       partners, the $82bn (£63bn) private equity giant CVC.
       “We lost about four months and everything got held up while we
       sorted out the salary cap issues,” he adds.
       Saracens are resigned to a season of exile and Childs – a
       previously casual rugby fan – has received a crash course in the
       laws and lore of the sport. Now his real task of converting club
       rugby into a slick commercial machine is beginning.
       Childs took up his post in June and has surrounded himself with
       former colleagues from UKTV. The new team are already preparing
       to move the headquarters of Premiership Rugby away from
       Twickenham, English rugby’s traditional south-west London
       stronghold, and into Covent Garden in the heart of the capital,
       closer to the brands they hope to attract as partners and a
       short walk from CVC’s offices on the Strand.
       “Rugby only went professional in 1995 and we’re a bit behind the
       curve,” says Childs
       “But we’re in a business where the interest in the product we
       create is just growing. The fan base is increasing. There are
       300m active rugby fans around the world and the great thing
       about technology is that it allows us to start to connect with
       them.”
       For many of the rugby men who have traditionally run the game
       with pride in its arcane structures and amateur spirit, the
       coming campaign of breakneck professionalisation is likely to be
       dizzying.
       “CVC are no doubt going to meet some resistance,” says Simon
       Gillham, the British chairman of the French club Brive. “But in
       the end money talks and that is what they are offering to the
       club owners and the competitions. CVC are incredibly ambitious
       for the sport.”
       For Premiership Rugby, CVC’s ambitions will mean heavy
       investment in almost all aspects of the sport. The private
       equity firm has won the confidence of club owners, who sold it a
       27pc stake in their competition for £200m, partly through basing
       its business plan entirely on new equity funding.
       However, there are no plans to deploy the debt trickery often
       used by buy-out firms to quickly boost returns, partly because
       returns from rugby are so low there is little to borrow against.
       CVC-backed rugby bosses are in line for the multi-million-pound
       paydays that are standard in private equity if they hit
       stretching targets in as soon as three years.
       In meetings with club leaders, Nick Clarry, one of the CVC
       partners leading the firm’s rugby push has highlighted just how
       little the sport makes compared with American football.
       Excluding television rights, he tells them, the Premiership
       final makes a return of about $3m each year.
       Meanwhile the Superbowl throws off in the region of $350m. CVC
       accepts that England is not America and the Premiership is not
       NFL, but argues that a ratio of nearly 120 times demonstrates
       that rugby has plenty of room to grow.
       The comparisons with American football run deeper as Childs
       attempts to deliver on CVC’s ambitions. The Premiership is
       already working on a streaming app for fans outside the UK,
       modelled on Game Pass, which allows British NFL fans to watch
       live matches for £14.99 per year.
       “The old broadcasting model was that you had to have big scale
       in markets to sell your product,” says Childs. “But now we can
       write a piece of code in Twickenham that can deliver coverage to
       someone in Tonga and tap into those superfans.”
       On home turf there is no prospect of Premiership Rugby going
       direct to consumers in this way, but as it prepares for an
       auction of broadcasting rights later this year, Childs is
       attempting to improve coverage with more uniform camera angles
       and better on-screen graphics that can help newcomers to the
       sport more easily understand the action.
       He has the power to make such changes. Although CVC only own
       27pc of Premiership Rugby, with the majority still controlled by
       the clubs, a complex shareholder agreement ensures it has
       day-to-day control.
       The money it has injected into the clubs cannot be paid out in
       dividends by owners – CVC feared triggering a spike in yacht
       purchases by owners – and is intended for investment in
       stadiums, facilities and academies.
       Although CVC had no direct influence, the punishment delivered
       to Saracens is also a signal that rugby must not squander its
       new riches inflating player salaries. As the sport changes, more
       money will arrive from other sources, the investment firm has
       assured impatient elements.
       The Premiership is wrestling with the idea of abandoning
       relegation and promotion – known as “ring-fencing” – effectively
       turning teams into NFL-style franchises. The move would reduce
       investment risk for team owners, but risks creating “dead
       rubber” matches unappealing to fans and broadcasters.
       Meanwhile the likes of Ealing Trailfinders, currently in the
       second tier and generously funded by the travel entrepreneur
       Mike Gooley, would have their dreams of top flight rugby dashed.
       Finances already cause tensions between the Premiership and the
       second tier, says Ben Ward, director of rugby at Trailfinders.
       “Something should be done to stop ring-fencing but also
       something should be done about the fairness of the competition
       and to help develop sides in this country. The Premiership this
       year is not exciting with relegation already decided.”
       Gillham of Brive agrees. “For me, the threat of relegation is
       really important for the game. You see it on people’s faces at
       Brive every week. We have been involved in relegation battles
       but I wouldn’t give them up for the world.” The ring-fencing
       debate has rumbled in rugby for a decade and is unlikely to be
       concluded quickly even under CVC’s influence.
       The forthcoming sale of television rights later this year is a
       more pressing question. The domestic rights are currently held
       by BT Sport, which pays about £40m per year and averages between
       150,000 and 200,000 viewers for each match. BT is understood to
       be keen to renew its contract.
       The broadcaster has proposed a deal in which it would pay
       nothing to show one game a week live, and aim to “upsell” fans
       to a package with complete coverage, splitting the proceeds with
       clubs.
       There are few signs of the idea being taken up, although the NFL
       is considering a similar arrangement to get a better foothold in
       British living rooms. BT sources suspect that their role in
       rugby may be under threat as CVC’s plans advance.
       Premiership Rugby is only one part of a global investment being
       led from London. CVC followed up in November with a £120m deal
       for a stake in Pro14, the top flight competition for Irish,
       Italian, Scottish, South African and Welsh sides.
       The Six Nations competition will be the next domino to fall,
       with the private equity firm due to pay the national rugby
       authorities £300m for a one-seventh stake. Talks are also under
       way with New Zealand and South African club rugby.
       It may be more difficult for CVC to take control of France’s Top
       14 competition, which has already enjoyed a major infusion of
       cash and is paid about £100m a season from the broadcaster
       Canal+.
       Owning a rugby club became de rigueur for continental
       billionaires such as Mohed Altrad of Montpellier and the cement
       industry and Hans-Peter Wild, owner of Stade Français and heir
       to the Capri-Sun drinks fortune. Top 14 is also structured as an
       association, with no company in which CVC could invest.
       The firm is nevertheless keen to involve French teams in the
       plans through the Champions Cup, the European club competition.
       Each of CVC’s investments in rugby must pay their own way, but
       the firm is gradually gaining more control over the global game,
       potentially allowing it to coordinate the sale of broadcasting
       rights to maximise their value. Clarry, alongside fellow partner
       Pev Hooper, has spoken in meetings of a dream scenario for CVC
       in which the Premiership acts as a “volume” product of weekly
       matches through winter to be sold alongside the “value” product
       of the Six Nations in spring and autumn internationals.
       Sky is understood to be developing ideas along the same lines
       for a rugby channel, where it could package up a sport senior
       executives have previously viewed as a “total mess” and sell it
       to pay-TV customers. Some at BT suspect close ties between CVC
       and Sky – who have previously worked together on Formula 1 and
       been joint investors in Sky Bet – makes such an outcome likely.
       Others are less sure.
       “I think there’s the question about whether CVC can effectively
       coordinate across all their fragmented interests,” says one
       experienced rights executive. “They don’t really have control.
       They might have commercial control but what kind of veto rights
       do the teams have? And there is clearly a lot of debate about
       what is the right approach of free-to-air versus pay-TV.”
       One senior broadcasting executive thinks the challenge is more
       fundamental. “I’m just not sure the sport is popular enough,” he
       says. “You can change the tournaments, make kits nicer, end
       relegation and promotion. Is that going to double the audience?
       I don’t think so.”
       CVC y must also contend with different national structures.
       While Premiership players are contracted to clubs and “loaned”
       to England, giving CVC influence over the RFU, the Welsh RFU
       secures its players on central contracts.
       The Six Nations rights are already on the block, delaying CVC’s
       investment. Its vision of the future is sharpening a process
       that the Clarry believes has been poorly run in the past,
       however.
       For the first time the BBC and ITV have been prevented from
       bidding together, a move designed to force the broadcasters to
       pay up to keep the competition free-to-air.
       The process has drawn fire from Julian Knight MP, the new
       Conservative chairman of the culture select committee, who last
       week warned “it’s of huge concern to see there’s a bidding war
       that could take the Six Nations behind a paywall” as he demanded
       more transparency.
       Jonathan Thompson, the chief executive of Digital UK, the
       terrestrial broadcaster joint venture that oversees the Freeview
       platform, says millions are at risk of being cut off from rugby.
       “What free-to-air television is uniquely able to do is unite the
       nations in a moment of intensity and common effort,” says
       Thompson.
       “If the Six Nations were to go behind a paywall, viewing figures
       show that around 10m people who currently tune in in of every
       corner of the UK would risk being deprived of the chance to join
       in.”
       CVC is determined to exploit all the rugby rights over which it
       has some say to the fullest, however.
       Clarry and the other partners in the investment have put up
       millions of their own money in a bet that with some bulking up,
       rugby’s financial underperformance can be tackled.
       #Post#: 40265--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 6 nations to go behind paywall
   DIR By: Monte
       Date: March 8, 2020, 2:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Tks DOk didn’t realize it was a problem
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 4
   DIR Previous Page