URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 39716--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Refereeing
   DIR By: never sleep
       Date: March 2, 2020, 4:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Mayor West link ---
       >
       > When the penalty try was awarded Exeter had given away seven
       penalties on the trot, six in the five metre red zone. It
       started with the high tackle on Marcus and ended with the eighth
       as the penalty try. If that wasn’t the right outcome how many
       penalties can you give away in that area and still come out
       without loosing points.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Also, the penalties resulted in 2 yellow cards.  Clearly,
       carding players wasn't working.  In fact, carding more players
       would probably have had a negative effect as the scrums would
       eventually have gone uncontested.
       I watched a Pro 14 game over the weekend. Kings v Connacht.
       From around the 63 minute mark, Connacht were camped on Kings
       tryline.  After many scrum penalties, Sir carded a Kings player.
       Connacht persisted with the scrum and on around the 69 minute
       mark he went under the sticks.  In my opinion, it seems a fair
       response in this sort of situation.
       #Post#: 39747--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Refereeing
   DIR By: Yareet
       Date: March 2, 2020, 8:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: A222Quin link ---
       >
       > Could've been avoided if he hadn't forgotten to play advantage
       when Gabs walked over in the corner a few minutes earlier.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       He didn’t forget to play advantage. He didn’t see the ball. It’s
       on the other side of the scrum and is watching the front rows
       stand up.
       #Post#: 39748--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Refereeing
   DIR By: Yareet
       Date: March 2, 2020, 8:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: never sleep link ---
       >
       > Also, the penalties resulted in 2 yellow cards.  Clearly,
       carding players wasn't working.  In fact, carding more players
       would probably have had a negative effect as the scrums would
       eventually have gone uncontested.
       >
       >
       > I watched a Pro 14 game over the weekend. Kings v Connacht.
       From around the 63 minute mark, Connacht were camped on Kings
       tryline.  After many scrum penalties, Sir carded a Kings player.
       Connacht persisted with the scrum and on around the 69 minute
       mark he went under the sticks.  In my opinion, it seems a fair
       response in this sort of situation.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Uncontested scrums with Chiefs down to 12 players should mean
       that Quins Score anyway.
       As far as I can see, there is nothing in the laws that allows
       for a penalty try except in cases where foul play prevented a
       try being scored.
       One _could_ argue that Quins would have dominated the last scrum
       if Chiefs has scrummaged legally and scored a push over try but
       that’s (for me) a big shout. One slip of the prop’s feet (as
       Lambert had already done) and the drive is stopped.
       In my view, more cards would’ve made the try (and therefore the
       penalty try) more likely.
       #Post#: 39773--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Refereeing
   DIR By: Camquin
       Date: March 2, 2020, 12:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Apparently Mr Ridley tookup the whistle in 2012 after an injury
       curtailed his playing career.
       He moved to Natinal 2 in 2013/14 National 1 in 2014/15 got his
       first Championship match in 2016 and Premiership since 2017/8.
       He will hve been assessed and coached throughout.
       PT is not for repeated penalties - it is for preventing a
       probable try. Repeated penalties result in yellow cards. It is
       the players job to use the space created. If the scrum goes
       uncontested, it still ties up 8 players.
       #Post#: 39813--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Refereeing
   DIR By: poorfour
       Date: March 3, 2020, 5:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Looking carefully at the highlights, the Exeter 17 is already
       almost parallel to the goal line by the time the ball goes in
       and immediately thereafter releases and retakes his bind. The
       Quins pack is properly bound and they all have good body
       positions and give a strong impression that they would be going
       forward if Exeter weren't folding in and forcing the whole thing
       sideways.
       Arguably, Quins are just painting a better picture for the ref,
       but given the loosehead is that far out of shape from the put in
       and the scrum has been shoved backwards the last time it was
       straight and stayed up, the decision looks less of a stretch
       than people are claiming.
       #Post#: 39818--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Refereeing
   DIR By: Fursty
       Date: March 3, 2020, 6:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       At first I thought definitely not a PT, however as pourfour says
       if Exeter had scrimmaged properly then we probably would have
       scored. If teams are deliberately and persistently offending
       they need to be punished.
       I think all of this is also slightly irrelevant as I’m pretty
       sure DC was about to go over anyway.
       #Post#: 39820--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Refereeing
   DIR By: never sleep
       Date: March 3, 2020, 7:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       On the replay it looks as though DC would be difficult to stop.
       The scrum had wheeled so there was no forwards in defence.
       The scrum half was on the wrong side.  So, there was basically a
       bit of a hole.
       If the ref was in agreement with this, then a PT is the correct
       decision as the offending team is disadvantaging us by making
       the conversion kick more difficult.
       A few years ago, I remember Mike Brown was cruising over to
       score in front of the South Stand but the ref awarded a PT to
       make it a 7 pointer rather than a 5 pointer.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page