URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 36596--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gloucester use Salary Cap loophole 
   DIR By: T-Bone
       Date: January 22, 2020, 4:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I didn't actually know about this rule, but it seems fairly
       clear. I initially thought it was similar to dual registration
       but appears to be a different matter. Dual registration is
       presumably only for academy players, who have a cap on their
       salaries anyway, so the dual registration is irrelevant to the
       cap?
       I wonder if we have any senior players out on loan, such as
       Earle who we knew at the start of the season would be out long
       term. I can't think who else at the start of the season was due
       to be out for the majority of the season. Maybe Bothma is on
       loan too?
       #Post#: 36605--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gloucester use Salary Cap loophole 
   DIR By: N.G.A.
       Date: January 22, 2020, 5:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: T-Bone link ---
       >
       >
       > I wonder if we have any senior players out on loan, such as
       Earle who we knew at the start of the season would be out long
       term.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I would have thought Earle would be covered as an injury
       dispensation.
       #Post#: 36624--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gloucester use Salary Cap loophole 
   DIR By: T-Bone
       Date: January 22, 2020, 6:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: N.G.A. link ---
       >
       > I would have thought Earle would be covered as an injury
       dispensation.
       >
       >
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       If I have understood correctly, when a player is injured, you
       still pay their salary (unless the contract says you don't,
       which seems unlikely, unless you've signed someone on pay as you
       play due to previous track record) and their salary counts
       towards the cap. If they are then injured, you can bring someone
       in of a similar standard and while you still have to pay them
       (obviously), their salary does not count towards the cap,
       subject to a maximum of £400,000 to cover all injury
       replacements.
       So if we got someone in to cover Earle, we'd still be paying him
       and it would count to the cap, and then paying any replacement
       (I don't think there is one) but the replacement's salary
       wouldn't count towards the cap.
       If we register Earle as a player on loan then we still pay him
       but his salary doesn't count towards the cap so long as he plays
       fewer then 4 games for us in the season (and each game he plays
       his salary counts on a pro rated basis). That's my understanding
       anyway. What I'm not sure about is whether you can register a
       player on loan so their salary doesn't count towards the cap,
       and then still get injury cover for them. I would guess not, as
       then you get two players and neither salary counts.
       So, again assuming my understanding is correct, if you know that
       a player will be injured for most the season (or can't play for
       some other reason, including to comply with the cap, like
       Lambert maybe) you can register them as on loan and their salary
       doesn't count, or if they get injured during the season then you
       get a replacement in and their salary doesn't count.
       In the case of someone like Lambert I suppose it is a slight
       loophole in that, if he is out on loan, his salary doesn't count
       towards the cap as long as he doesn't play enough games (and
       from memory did he just play in A league, cup and then fewer
       than 4 proper games?) but he can still train, so he's helping
       make up numbers in training, passing on experience to younger
       players, etc
       #Post#: 36650--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gloucester use Salary Cap loophole 
   DIR By: Quinky
       Date: January 22, 2020, 8:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That raises an interesting point - if a club signs a player but
       they don't play, are they still counted under the cap? If not, a
       club could theoretically sign (for example) Itoje, he doesn't
       play the rest of the season, Sarries have reduced their bill,
       and Itoje still trains with the club etc.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page