URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 21552--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Saracens Under Investigation
   DIR By: never sleep
       Date: April 11, 2019, 5:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Punishment doesn't need to be dropping down divisions.
       Also, financial punishments are pointless if the club has a
       wealthy benefactor.
       Two simple punishments are - deduction of league points
       depending on scale of misdemeanour.  E.g. drop a point from us
       for our mistake that was reported a while back.
       The second, would be the more harsh punishment - imo.  drop out
       of Champions cup or Challenge cup for a number of seasons.  This
       hurts in many ways and would be enough of a deterrent to stop
       clubs from trying to exploit loopholes.
       #Post#: 21566--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Saracens Under Investigation
   DIR By: Quinky
       Date: April 11, 2019, 8:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Blucherquin link ---
       >
       > Oh what a surprise.
       >
       > Here's a lesson for those on here who love to write total
       nonsense about journalism and making stuff up.
       >
       > Regardless of outcome or if it's a breach of salary cap or
       not, when Wray posted his clearly diversionary statement there
       was a lot of "oh well there you go".
       >
       > Well now it appears he hadn't told Premiership Rugby. Although
       he said he did.
       >
       > So it may well not be a dodge at all - but PRL didn't know.
       >
       > But apparently rather than being a massive slur on Sarries
       reputation like it was when he released his massive statement,
       now it's just "a minor internal oversight".
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I fear you are right, but hope not. The optimist in me want s to
       think that PRL won't cower under any threats this time;
       similarly, other clubs should be standing up and insisting that
       action is taken (if what Mr Walkinshaw says about last time is
       true). This is of course, assuming that they are found to have
       done wrong.
       #Post#: 21568--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Saracens Under Investigation
   DIR By: Quinky
       Date: April 11, 2019, 8:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: A222Quin link ---
       >
       > ...fair play to them...
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Sarries and "fair play"... not a link I'd use too often ;)
       #Post#: 21580--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Saracens Under Investigation
   DIR By: A222Quin
       Date: April 11, 2019, 10:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Quinky link ---
       >
       > Sarries and "fair play"... not a link I'd use too often ;)
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Fair point! Unfortunate choice of words there from me.
       I’ll rephrase to “Credit to them for taking the post playing
       careers seriously”
       #Post#: 21582--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Saracens Under Investigation
   DIR By: Yareet
       Date: April 11, 2019, 10:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Lyndo76 link ---
       >
       > good they are investigating, although I fear it may end up
       with the "they found a loophole and used it, loophole will be
       closed" outcome. the problem is, if they are found to have done
       something wrong, I don't have confidence in PRL to actually be
       transparent or punish them.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Only caveat to that is that one of the conditions of the cap is
       that you have to report any loopholes. So in your example they
       will be admitting to cheating the cap.
       Hence why Sarries' line is that this is nothing to do with rugby
       matters. Their top players just happen to also be business
       geniuses who have had amazing business ideas that Wray and his
       fellow sponsors/directors desperately wanted to invest in.....
       #Post#: 21592--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Saracens Under Investigation
   DIR By: DOK
       Date: April 11, 2019, 12:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       And they don't see the benefit of their investment now (that
       would be salary) it's further down the line (post their time at
       Sarries).
       I imagine a lot of people come back from a stint with England or
       whoever with enough cash to buy a house (or at least put a
       deposit down). No problem with rugby players buying houses for
       investment there.
       It's the Saracens input I wonder about.
       Suppose as a player you have a spare £100,000 (as you do), and
       this will get you a house that will improve at 5% of that a year
       .
       Now suppose you could buy a house in a CrossRail area, houses
       there improve at 20% a year.
       However, you need at least £200,000 to buy one of these houses.
       Sarries go in 50/50 with you for the investment, now you can buy
       the £200,000 house.
       Say you have 5 years left at Sarries, on your own you'd have
       made £25,000 from your £100,000.
       In the joint investment system you've made £100,000.
       Can that £75,000 extra you've made be regarded as remuneration
       from Saracens or just good investment? A helping hand from the
       club?
       I know in reality you'd probably just pay deposits and take out
       mortgages and use one property as surety for another etc.. and I
       don't even want to think about compound interest.
       #Post#: 21593--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Saracens Under Investigation
   DIR By: Quinten Poulsen
       Date: April 11, 2019, 12:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       In theory I don't see anything wrong with going into business
       with players. As long as everything is above board and they're
       not somehow chucking money at the players. I didn't know this
       until recently but there are some exemptions in the salary cap
       which are not loopholes.
       #Post#: 21630--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Saracens Under Investigation
   DIR By: deadlyfrom5yardsout
       Date: April 12, 2019, 4:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I quite like the recruitment freeze idea for misdemeanours. I
       guess it would have to be longer than one window though.
       #Post#: 21634--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Saracens Under Investigation
   DIR By: Monte
       Date: April 12, 2019, 4:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes but players retire and get injured so they could end up with
       insufficient players in specialist positions or feigning
       injuries in order to be able to recruit
       #Post#: 21638--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Saracens Under Investigation
   DIR By: deadlyfrom5yardsout
       Date: April 12, 2019, 4:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       In which case you need a secondary line of punishment such as
       forfeiting points if you are unable to fulfill a fixture or
       something similar...?
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 4
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page