URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 18254--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Saracens broken salary cap rules?
   DIR By: Yareet
       Date: March 5, 2019, 7:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Pickled Pelican link ---
       >
       > If the "investor" puts in £x into the players company, the
       player plays out his contract(s), leaves the club, a short while
       later the investor walks away from the business, but leaves the
       investment in situ.
       > Is this a way to give a player money over a long term??
       > Does it fall within the cap, it's a separate business
       arrangement and the player's left the club??
       >
       --- End Quote ---
  HTML https://d2cx26qpfwuhvu.cloudfront.net/premier/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/03161651/Salary-Cap-Regulations-2018-19.pdf
       Ex -players are covered on page 40 as being under the same
       regulations (effectively)
       #Post#: 18322--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Saracens broken salary cap rules?
   DIR By: DOK
       Date: March 6, 2019, 6:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Saracens probed by rival club:
  HTML https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-6774593/Saracens-probed-rival-club-Firm-hired-Premiership-team-investigate-offshore-accounts.html<br
       />Firm hired by Premiership team to investigate offshore
       accounts
       due to lack of confidence in governing body
       #Post#: 18323--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Saracens broken salary cap rules?
   DIR By: DOK
       Date: March 6, 2019, 6:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Nice to see the clubs have the same confidence in PRL as the
       fans! So now we have PRL, the Salary Cap admin person, the Daily
       Mail and an unnamed club and forensic set of accountants all
       looking at Saracens salary cap adhesion. Should be interesting
       to see how that plays out.
       #Post#: 18324--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Saracens broken salary cap rules?
   DIR By: Cookie
       Date: March 6, 2019, 7:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ryan Walkinshaw (Gloucester) posted an interesting thread on
       Twitter:
  HTML https://mobile.twitter.com/RyanWalkinshaw/status/1103096549599408128<br
       />
       #Post#: 18328--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Saracens broken salary cap rules?
   DIR By: honkytonk
       Date: March 6, 2019, 7:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Lets just hope we are clean (barring the recent mis hap)
       #Post#: 18331--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Saracens broken salary cap rules?
   DIR By: Nico Wilson
       Date: March 6, 2019, 7:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       And benefits in kind (e.g. subsidised mortgages) are caught and
       are deemed to be Salary:
       --- Quote ---
       >
       > (p) any payment or benefit in kind which the Player would not
       have received if it were not for his involvement with a Club;
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       See Schedule 1, starting on page 38:
  HTML https://d2cx26qpfwuhvu.cloudfront.net/premier/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/03161651/Salary-Cap-Regulations-2018-19.pdf
       #Post#: 18333--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Saracens broken salary cap rules?
   DIR By: InsertQuinsPunHere
       Date: March 6, 2019, 7:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Cookie link ---
       >
       > Ryan Walkinshaw (Gloucester) posted an interesting thread on
       Twitter:
  HTML https://mobile.twitter.com/RyanWalkinshaw/status/1103096549599408128
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yikes... that's eye opening.
       #Post#: 18334--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Saracens broken salary cap rules?
   DIR By: Cookie
       Date: March 6, 2019, 8:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: InsertQuinsPunHere link ---
       >
       > Yikes... that's eye opening.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Indeed. Can't find the tweet, but he mentioned how many players,
       ex-players etc had liked and re-tweeted his thread and said he
       wanted an independent auditor (e.g. PWC) to do the
       investigation, but was voted down.
       #Post#: 18336--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Saracens broken salary cap rules?
   DIR By: Quinky
       Date: March 6, 2019, 8:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Cookie link ---
       >
       > Indeed. Can't find the tweet, but he mentioned how many
       players, ex-players etc had liked and re-tweeted his thread and
       said he wanted an independent auditor (e.g. PWC) to do the
       investigation, but was voted down.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Another interesting point for me is where he says that getting
       info from the players is unlikely. I wonder if this would
       change, should a player have a falling out with the club or its
       owner. Ultimately, the player would not be responsible for their
       remuneration, and whether it's all been declared - to PRL or to
       the taxman.
       The second question would be at what point the club are
       responsible for the owner's actions. Hypothetically, the owner
       could pay from his own pocket without the club being aware. The
       player is still being paid. This is covered under the "related
       parties" bit of the rules, I believe.
       The comment about financial penalties is correct, assuming that
       this is levied on the club and the owner just pumps more money
       in. It's a cost/risk balance. Maybe any guilty club should
       suffer a reduction in their penalty cap, in line with the amount
       of the breach, for a first offence? Overpay by £1m, their cap is
       reduced by £1m.
       #Post#: 18338--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Saracens broken salary cap rules?
   DIR By: stoquin
       Date: March 6, 2019, 8:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       is he still involved in Gloucester I thought he had sold up
       several years ago. Not saying he can't have views as a rugby and
       Gloucester fan.
       *****************************************************
       Page 6 of 13
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page