DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Classical Theism
  HTML https://classicaltheism.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Philosophy
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 84--------------------------------------------------
       Foundationalism in Epistemology?
       By: Brian Date: February 14, 2020, 8:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Is there any consensus about foundationalism in epistemology?
       Are there sufficiently good arguments for or against it?  Is
       there any reason a theist or Christian philosopher would be more
       inclined to one position or the other?
       For most of my philosophical education I had learned from and
       accepted foundationalism as the correct paradigm for analyzing
       epistemological questions, but if pushed, they seem to always
       fall into Pyrrhonain skepticism, and in general the approach
       seems less popular these days (that could be a mis-perception
       thought).  A few months ago I read Kai-Man Kwan's The Rainbow of
       Experiences, Critical Trust, and God, in which he argues against
       foundationalism, and I found it very persuasive.  I'm slowly
       becoming interested in the state of the contemporary debate on
       this topic.
       #Post#: 93--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Foundationalism in Epistemology?
       By: Atno Date: February 20, 2020, 11:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'm the one who recommended Kai's book, and I agree that he
       makes important criticisms. But I'm also a convinced
       foundationalism. I believe foundationalism is the way to go, but
       it must be a foundationalism that is open to basic beliefs,
       Moorean-Reidian common sense, and phenomenal conservatism.
       I'm a very strong proponent of phenomenal conservatism - which
       is a principle similar to, but stronger than, Kai's principle of
       critical trust.
       All our beliefs must be ultimately grounded on some basic,
       non-inferential beliefs which we can somehow sense to be true,
       which we accept with "critical trust". These basic beliefs are
       not limited to just logic or our sense experiences. They must
       include the whole rainbow of human experience- aesthetic
       experience, moral, religious, interpersonal, and so on.
       To me, if P seems to S to be true, that gives S some
       justification to believe that P.
       You might enjoy reading Michael Huemer's "Skepticism and the
       Veil of Perception", it's an important book on epistemology.
       *****************************************************