URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Chainsaw Repair
  HTML https://chainsawrepair.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: How To Basics and Fixes
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 70501--------------------------------------------------
       intake/crankcase stuff
       By: 1manband Date: March 22, 2016, 3:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       looking at the some of the papers, many state there is benefit
       to fooling with lengths, x-sect areas and volumes.
       hope to get into some different ways to figure this out.
       i enjoy working design numbers if y'all haven't noticed.
       maybe just more of my digital garbage, don't yet know myself.
       number/graph phobia folks........shield your eyes!  hahaha.
       #Post#: 70507--------------------------------------------------
       Re: intake/crankcase stuff
       By: 1manband Date: March 22, 2016, 5:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ok, this is the science end of it.
       screenshot shows the idea.
       frequency is expressed as "Hz" and is how many waves pass by the
       same location point in one second.
       think about it as a piston moves up and down in the cylinder.
       as rpms increase, piston moves more times per second, same idea
       as waves and Hz.
       everything i do in the thread will be done with references.
       before anybody says....."but there is a transfer port too."
       "what about that?"
       in a paper on delivery ratio, by komatori and watanabe....they
       state that the intake is not affected by the previous
       cycle......page 11.
       paraphrasing their words not mine.  and that's how the rest of
       my blabber will be written whether i agree with it or not.
       #Post#: 70508--------------------------------------------------
       Re: intake/crankcase stuff
       By: 1manband Date: March 22, 2016, 5:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       above reference was from georgia state university.  great site.
       search >sound waves>resonance>cavity resonance ......and you
       will find it.
       plodding along, some motor books and magizines and other things
       use this formula to find resonance in intakes and such.
       the delivery ratio paper i noted for 2 strokes uses this as
       well.
       cool feature on the georgia state U site, it can calculate all
       this for you if you just plug in your motor measurements.  it
       also has a temperature correction feature if you decide to add
       that in as well.  just make sure you use the same units of
       measure.
       since i am using the paper, if you plug in the values they list
       on page 11.......you will also find out that they made a boo
       boo.  enough about that. <edit: will look into that again, has
       got to be something i missed.>
       paper is great info.
       #Post#: 70509--------------------------------------------------
       Re: intake/crankcase stuff
       By: 1manband Date: March 22, 2016, 6:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       more in a bit.
       #Post#: 70514--------------------------------------------------
       Re: intake/crankcase stuff
       By: 1manband Date: March 22, 2016, 7:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       that GSU calculator is cool.
       couple of things that i ran into, that may save some time.
       just a note, to help if you use the online tool.
       in the paper, they use the 'mean' crankcase volume.  this is the
       BDC volume of the crankcase + 1/2 the swept volume.
       if you do this by hand......
       from the paper they use, c = 1100 ft/second.  if you work it out
       by a handheld calculator, use 13200 inches/second to match the
       other units, or the answer will come out wrong.
       next will work out a chainsaw motor to see what it is.
       
       #Post#: 70518--------------------------------------------------
       Re: intake/crankcase stuff
       By: 1manband Date: March 22, 2016, 9:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       jonsereds 52......this motor never stops amazing me.  good
       stuff.<<<edit: not as good as i thought.>>
       hits twice.<<<<<edit:  just once>>
       <edit> after warning you guys to watch the units, i did not.
       plugged in 118.5 cc's for case volume, it should have been in
       cubic inches...  7.23 in3
       changed the screenshot to reflect this.
       #Post#: 70520--------------------------------------------------
       Re: intake/crankcase stuff
       By: 3000 FPS Date: March 22, 2016, 9:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So what do most chainsaw engines require.    Are the intakes
       close in length and port opening to be efficient as they come
       stock or would adding length to an intake help with the resonate
       frequency or opening of the port.   Also when you port a saw
       that is showing RPM's of 9000 in the cut, and because the larger
       port has now dropped the resonate frequency does this come
       closer to that 9000 rpm or further away from it.
       #Post#: 70523--------------------------------------------------
       Re: intake/crankcase stuff
       By: 1manband Date: March 23, 2016, 12:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=3000 FPS link=topic=5779.msg70520#msg70520
       date=1458701495]
       So what do most chainsaw engines require.    Are the intakes
       close in length and port opening to be efficient as they come
       stock or would adding length to an intake help with the resonate
       frequency or opening of the port.   Also when you port a saw
       that is showing RPM's of 9000 in the cut, and because the larger
       port has now dropped the resonate frequency does this come
       closer to that 9000 rpm or further away from it.
       [/quote]
       take another look at the screenshot roger.  i fixed an error.  i
       got a little wowed by the previous erroneous result.
       what would be ideal is have the motor work like the way those
       two guys explain.  waves have peaks and valleys.  thing, or goal
       would be to get the peaks and valleys of the waves to do what
       you want at a certain rpm.  both the intake and transfer ports
       need different things to work well.  during the initial portion
       of the open duration of the intake port (when port just starts
       to open), a big valley is good.  during the latter portion, of
       the transfer duration phase (just before it closes), a peak is
       good.
       if the peaks and valleys happen at the wrong time, they do not
       help.  to make things worse for tuning is that the "goal" is a
       moving target because it changes with rpm.
       in the paper, they have some ....lots of graphs.  the page that
       explains this better than i ever will is page 11.  the graph
       shows what is good and bad, with changing rpm.  tomorrow will
       put some notes on it, hope it will help.  once you see it, you
       will see it.
       ****<<<EDIT......this is wrong>>>   IMO......in order for any of
       this resonant tuning to really help, it needs to be within the
       actual rpm range the motor can spin at.  the 'natural
       frequency'......the one i called RPM at Hz is really the one
       that needs to be within this rpm range.  END of IMO.<<<<Do not
       listen to my drivel!!!! *****
       looking at the first 'science' screenshot......as far as porting
       is involved with this kind of thing.....a bigger hole makes the
       frequency Hz value change.
       then, looking at my corrected screenshot......those frequencies
       are really up there.  for example.....300 Hz = 18,000
       RPM......not sure quite yet if they will make a difference.  (in
       my erroneous screenshot, an 118.5 cubic inch would be fine for a
       chainsaw motor rpm range).  will have to run some numbers, have
       not got quite that far yet.  yes indeed sir, good questions.....
       #Post#: 70528--------------------------------------------------
       Re: intake/crankcase stuff
       By: 1manband Date: March 23, 2016, 8:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       some links for reference information i am using so far:
       1.  georgia state university resonance and online calcs.:
  HTML http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html
       2.  delivery ratio by K&W:
  HTML http://www.vintagesnow.com/SledU_Folder/delivery_ratio-1.pdf
       3.  delivery ratio by N&S:
  HTML http://vintagesnow.com/SledU_Folder/33u5gnr3.pdf
       #Post#: 70541--------------------------------------------------
       Re: intake/crankcase stuff
       By: 1manband Date: March 23, 2016, 2:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       side note:  the intake/crankcase res formula, much like exhaust
       formulas, are based on sound waves.  through experiments, folks
       found that they approximate physical testing of pressure waves.
       sidetrack to some pressure things.  intake-crankcase tuning is
       interrelated to porting. since the size of the hole also affects
       the intake/crankcase Hz. this helps show what is ideal.
       interesting thing at transfer port just close at higher rpm.
       from reference #2 below.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page