URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Chainsaw Repair
  HTML https://chainsawrepair.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Mowers Tillers Tractors etc
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 53506--------------------------------------------------
       CC v/s HP
       By: Chainsawrepair Date: February 1, 2015, 8:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ok I am still old school on this stuff and confuses me when I
       want to know the hp size of something now days when it is listed
       in cc.
       Talking gas motors like it used to be.  1.5hp 2hp 3hp 3.5hp 5hp
       12hp etc etc. That way I know what size something is on a push
       mower, riding mower or snow blower etc.
       I am starting to see everything in cc that is newer. If I ask
       what hp would that be folks selling dont even know.
       So just trying to get some ballpark info put together to be able
       to do comparisons of hp and cc.
       #Post#: 53507--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CC v/s HP
       By: Chainsawrepair Date: February 1, 2015, 8:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Reasons why for new cc figures.
       copy paste
       Manufacturers have always given max. HP ratings, just like auto
       makers. But mower engines have a 'speed limit' of about 3200 RPM
       for safety reasons. So, an engine that produces 6.5 HP at 3600
       RPM will produce less at the mandated lower speed. Duh. As long
       as everyone uses the same rating method, a 7.0 HP rating would
       always mean a more powerful engine than a 6.0 HP rating. So
       after a bunch of whiney-cats sued them, they now have to give
       torque ratings (usable work) instead of HP ratings.
       The 'cc' number is cubic centimeters of displacement, or the
       'size' of the engine. All things being equal, a larger engine
       makes more power. Currently, mower engines have grown to about
       190 to 195 cc as a result of the horsepower war brought about by
       the trend toward mulching and self-propelled mowers.
       So, if you need a very powerful snow blower, go by the rating
       and displacement, although the two do not necessarily go hand in
       hand.
       #Post#: 53508--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CC v/s HP
       By: Chainsawrepair Date: February 1, 2015, 8:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       copy paste
       cc to horsepower
       Snowblower season is now upon us. Going to buy a new
       snowblower this year? But you don't know how powerful it is?
       Here is an approximate cc to horsepower chart for small engines.
       This chart ONLY gives an IDEA of how much horsepower CAN BE
       achieved by a stock engine of that CC size. There are too many
       variables, such as carb size, muffler flow, timing, valve
       duration. Some of these were taken from ads that stated
       "replacement 179 cc engine for 5hp snowblowers". This just lets
       you know that a 179cc engine can NOT be a 10 hp engine. Hope
       this helps in deciding which snowblower you buy.
       123 cc = 4 hp
       179 cc = 5 hp
       208 cc = 5.5 to 6 hp
       277 cc = 7 to 8 hp
       291cc = 9hp
       305 cc = 9 to 10 hp
       342 cc = 11 to 12 hp
       357 cc = 13 hp
       420 cc = 13-15 hp
       #Post#: 53509--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CC v/s HP
       By: Chainsawrepair Date: February 1, 2015, 8:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Dont know if this info is right or not but gives me something to
       start at.
       copy paste
       It is hard to convert cc to H.P. on the engine specs they
       usually now tell you max kW at what rpm
       1 hp = .75kW,
       and 1 hp. = 550 foot pounds per second, of torque.
       On a mower or for that matter a outboard motor where you are
       spinning a blade or propeller torque is more important than
       horse power.
       #Post#: 53510--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CC v/s HP
       By: Chainsawrepair Date: February 1, 2015, 8:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I been living under a rock it seems.
       cc to torque to hp Conversion Update November 2014
  HTML http://movingsnow.com/2008/cc-to-torque-to-hp-conversion-update/
       123 cc = 4 hp
       179 cc = 5 hp
       208 cc = 8 to 9 Gross Torque = 5.5 to 6 hp
       277 cc = 11 to 11.5 Gross Torque = 7 to 8 hp
       305 cc = 13.5 to 14.5 Gross Torque = 9 to 10 hp
       342 cc = 15.5 to 16.5 Gross Torque = 11 to 12 hp
       357 cc = 14 hp
       420 cc = 15 hp
       #Post#: 53533--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CC v/s HP
       By: RoyM Date: February 1, 2015, 12:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It does get confusing especially for the consumer who has no
       clue about torque or cc's and the manufacturers only add to it.
       Briggs replaces the very common 21M314-0017 with the 20M307-0001
       service engine and some complain they are getting a less
       powerful unit. I highly doubt anyone would notice in the real
       world but it is one cu inch smaller.
       #Post#: 53554--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CC v/s HP
       By: srcarr52 Date: February 1, 2015, 10:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Honda GX200, 196cc, 21hp. Just a little modified drinking
       alcohol.
       #Post#: 53558--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CC v/s HP
       By: 660magnum Date: February 2, 2015, 12:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have several B&S push mower variations and they all have the
       6.75 ft lb torque engine. 190cc or 11.6 ci.
       I like them very well.
       Tonight I went to the B&S website and they had a torque curve
       chart for that engine series. The 6.75 ft lbs torque is at 2600
       rpm.
       I looked at what torque they have at 3600 rpm where the engine
       normally runs and converted that to horse power.
       They are 4 hp at 3600 rpm. This doesn't sound as impressive as
       6.75 ft lbs torque?
       #Post#: 54117--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CC v/s HP
       By: fuzz1500 Date: February 11, 2015, 5:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I hate thst they have gone away from hp ratings :(
       #Post#: 56588--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CC v/s HP
       By: Al Smith Date: April 6, 2015, 2:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Briggs had a tendency to fudge the HP ratings.I have for example
       several 18 HP horizontal oppossed flat heads rated at 18 HP
       .Seems funny I also have one,same model and displacement rated
       at 19.5 HP .
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page