DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Circle of the Evening Star
HTML https://ces14.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Pagan News
*****************************************************
#Post#: 123--------------------------------------------------
Female anatomy in art...?
DIR By: Jen
Date: April 19, 2015, 1:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Though certainly not current events, this was an interesting
article to read. In it, the author supposes -and claims there
is some scholarly evidence- that the patriarchal take-over (ok,
she didn't use exactly those words) utilized art to further
suppress women. They did this by proudly crafting male
anatomical parts while leaving lady-parts prominently ...
absent. There is a little bit of interesting discussion
regarding art, statues in particular, as they go back in history
- identifying prehistoric statues, such as the Venus of
Willendorf, in which female anatomy is accurately depicted, and
then as it progresses, it becomes less so, eventually so that
women are portrayed with their true bodies hidden. Of course,
there is little to compare with the ancient statues, because
there are no male equivalents (that I know of).
I found the article to be an interesting opinion piece. There
are few facts; and a few incorrect ones (for example: that
Easter is a holiday based on the worship of Astarte. Not quite
accurate on that point. Easter, or Ostara, was actually derived
from the worship of Oestra, a Germanic goddess. Astarte is
frequently associated with Ishtar and Inanna. The confusion, I
believe, comes from the mythology of Jesus. He supposedly died
and lived again, and while this story is modeled on Inanna's
Descent, the Christian movement chose to celebrate at the time
of the Pagan Ostara, thereby taking over the Pagan holiday).
While reading it, I had another thought that perhaps these
'scholars' the author alludes to have the wrong idea. Perhaps,
instead of stripping women's identity and power by not outlining
every nuance of the female body, maybe - just maybe- the effort
of hiding her form was a way to show there are mysteries known
only to those who follow the goddess, and are initiated by
her... That's not an entirely complete thought, but does the
idea make sense?
Anyway, what are your thoughts on this article? Do you agree?
Disagree? What's your take on the idea of the lack of
anatomical representation adding to the suppression and
glorification of the various sexes?
HTML http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/apr/13/absent-female-genitals-art-repeated
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1