URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Camelot Fantasies 
  HTML https://castleknights.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Pro Player Discussions
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 8325--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Masterclass Fireside
       By: masterclass Date: January 28, 2014, 10:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Agreed general.   Can you think of a reason why they are not?
       Respectfully,
       masterclass
       #Post#: 8326--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Masterclass Fireside
       By: thetruth Date: January 28, 2014, 10:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=masterclass link=topic=541.msg8321#msg8321
       date=1390925719]
       Lady TT, I'm convinced Magnus Norman has the proper plans for a
       player to beat Nadal anywhere.
       But as with any plan, the individual has to have the ability,
       fortitude, and some good fortune to be able to execute them.
       And against top players, it isn't usually just one plan, usually
       you have to have at least a plan B, since top players are
       usually able to adapt during a 5 set match, and so one has to be
       able to vary the tactics so the player is unable to settle into
       a rhythm.   If you listen to top players comments after they
       lose, you will very often hear them say that they couldn't find
       their rhythm enough during the match.
       This is why I would never agree to having the men play best of 3
       set matches in majors.  In best of 3, a good player can be swept
       away before having time to adapt and the lesser player can win.
       I personally feel all men's finals should be best of 5, no
       matter the tournament.
       It surely isn't easy to execute against the very best players.
       If it were, everybody would do it.  And we know that it not the
       case.
       Also, it's not only one side that can have good tactics.  Both
       opponents are trying to impose their tactics on the match.
       Fortune favors the brave, and the most successful execution
       wins.
       It's not just Nadal. Tactics can be developed that can be used
       to beat any top player.
       It's still a question of having sufficient talent, mental
       strength, and fitness to be able to execute those tactics.
       Respectfully,
       masterclass
       [/quote]
       I agree. I don't think that it's strokes and technique that
       always beats the lesser players, it's a combination of things.
       Isn't it funny how players like Norman can get others to the top
       of the mountain, but not themselves?
       #Post#: 8328--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Masterclass Fireside
       By: Clay Death Date: January 28, 2014, 11:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=masterclass link=topic=541.msg8325#msg8325
       date=1390927098]
       Agreed general.   Can you think of a reason why they are not?
       Respectfully,
       masterclass
       [/quote]
       their reasoning:
       the sport has become too demanding.
       I think they destroyed a great tradition. masters finals are
       also great preparation for the slams which are all best of 5
       sets formats.
       so the masters series events with best of 5 sets finals should
       be restored.
       #Post#: 8332--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Masterclass Fireside
       By: thetruth Date: January 28, 2014, 11:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=masterclass link=topic=541.msg8325#msg8325
       date=1390927098]
       Agreed general.   Can you think of a reason why they are not?
       Respectfully,
       masterclass
       [/quote]
       My post may have gotten lost.
       I think it's to help an aging Federer.
       BO5 in regular tourneys might disadvantage him a bit.
       He's still a cash cow for the tour and sells tickets.
       They kind of always do this to protect their investments.
       #Post#: 8334--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Masterclass Fireside
       By: thetruth Date: January 28, 2014, 11:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Clay Death link=topic=541.msg8328#msg8328
       date=1390928847]
       [quote author=masterclass link=topic=541.msg8325#msg8325
       date=1390927098]
       Agreed general.   Can you think of a reason why they are not?
       Respectfully,
       masterclass
       [/quote]
       their reasoning:
       the sport has become too demanding.
       I think they destroyed a great tradition. masters finals are
       also great preparation for the slams which are all best of 5
       sets formats.
       so the masters series events with best of 5 sets finals should
       be restored.
       [/quote]
       That's a good point, too.
       The sport has gotten so demanding, turning it into a young man's
       game.
       There's multiple reasons, I suppose. We've brainstormed two so
       far.
       #Post#: 8347--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Masterclass Fireside
       By: Clay Death Date: January 28, 2014, 11:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [move]WELCOME TO MASTERCLASS FIRESIDE
       
       WELCOME TO MASTERCLASS FIRESIDE[/move]
       [URL=
gopher.createaforum.com:70 /forums/castleknights/p/541/2:121: line too long