DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Carrie Brown : Murder In The East River Hotel
HTML https://carriebrown.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Editorials & Essays
*****************************************************
#Post#: 5096--------------------------------------------------
The Verdict : The Reason In A Nutshell
DIR By: HowBrown1953
Date: August 7, 2025, 6:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I couldn't figure out a proper place to put this...so this will
have to do.
Ever since the verdict was read on July 3, 1891....a good number
of people, particularly court reporters for the various
newspapers in New York City,
and "Monday-morning quarterbacks" criticized the verdict
rendered in the Ali Trial.
If they believed he was innocent due to reasonable doubt having
been established, they clamored for his freedom.
On the other hand, if they felt that in light of the guilty
verdict for murder, he should have been sentenced to death if he
was guilty in the first place.
You can't satisfy people like this. The people in Ali's corner,
one would think, would have been happy that he was spared the
electric chair....
but that's not what happened....and we see references to how the
jury rendered its verdict appear in print for many years
afterward.
Some questioned the 'New York justice' dispensed in the
verdict...that it was either guilty and a death sentence...or
not guilty at all.
It is somewhat astounding that the court reporters, above all
other scribes...fairly well-versed in how trials and verdicts
go...would not have accepted
the verdict and above all, understood the reasoning behind the
verdict, since it happened with regularity in capital cases that
they'd covered before the Ali trial.
Anyway......this explains the verdict in a nutshell.
Since premeditation was not proven, the only course for the jury
to follow was for a second-degree sentence.
New York Sun
February 5, 1888
**************
HTML https://i.imgur.com/tWFg8qZ.jpg
A "Monday morning quarterback" is someone who offers advice or
criticism about a past event, especially a sports game, after it
has already happened. This person analyzes the situation with
the benefit of hindsight, pointing out what should have been
done differently, but without having been involved in the actual
decision-making process. The term is often used negatively,
implying that the advice is easy to give after the fact and
doesn't offer real value.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1