URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Carrie Brown : Murder In The East River Hotel
  HTML https://carriebrown.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Editorials & Essays
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 5020--------------------------------------------------
       Situations,Scenarios, & Possible Solutions: August 1, 2025
   DIR By: HowBrown1953
       Date: August 1, 2025, 8:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       While I believe that the case is fine and dandy as it
       is...unresolved with the matter of who murdered Carrie Brown:
       whether George Damon's story holds
       water: and whether Amer Ben Ali went to Algeria: and a host of
       other things....these are four items for perusual.
       Pete must be rolling his eyes like Nina does at seeing yet
       another attempt on my part to outline where
       we stand....but heck, I got bored and figured I'd kill some time
       with this list.
       All ideas and criticisms are welcome.
       ------------------------------------------
       Four Situations August 1 2025
       ONE-
       C. Kniclo kills Brown
       Takes key and locks door
       Ali:
       1. Cannot enter room
       2. Did not get her blood on himself
       3. Formad's and Flint's determination was a mistake
       4. Sultan's story of the confession was a lie.
       Issues:
       2.Had blood on his person and the material under his nails
       accepted to have come from Brown
       3.Formad and Flint brought in because they were the top in their
       field. Defense does not reject their finds
       other than Gibier's opinion on tyrosine.
       4.Why does an interpreter hired by the defense come up with a
       story like that?
       ****************************************************************
       TWO-
       C. Kniclo kills Brown
       Takes key but doesn't lock door
       Ali:
       1. Enters unlocked door
       2.Gets blood on himself
       3.Formad and Flint's determination was correct
       4.Confession complete, did not murder her
       Issues:
       2. Why touch her when she was visibly dead( head wrapping and
       evisceration)?
       ***************************************************************
       THREE-
       C.Kniclo didn't kill Brown
       Takes key, doesn't lock door
       Ali:
       1. Gains access to Room 31, either through an unlocked door or
       by Carrie Brown.
       2. Kills her, gets her blood on himself
       3. Formad and Flint were correct in their findings
       4. Confession incomplete, does not confess to murder but to
       being in room.
       Issue:
       4. Confession to being in room only part of story
       ***************************************************************
       FOUR-
       C.Kniclo didn't kill Brown
       Takes key, locks door
       Ali:
       1. Is let into room by a living Carrie Brown
       2. Kills her, gets her blood on himself
       3. Formad and Flint were correct
       4. Confession incomplete, does not confess to murder but to
       being in room
       Issue:
       4. Confession to being in room only part of story
       **************************************************************
       Miscellaneous:
       Why does C .Kniclo take and keep key instead of disposing of it?
       Why does he take it to Cranford but not take it with him?
       How does Ali lock the door if a key was required and if it was
       indeed locked?
       How did the lint under his nails figure in?  From his own bed or
       hers?
       Why sneak out? Why would Fitzgerald invent a story like this?
       Was door actually locked when Fitzgerald went to the room in the
       morning?
       Damon's story could have been true even if key not authenticated
       and description
       of farmhand either intentionally wrong or accidentally
       misremembered in 1901.
       C. Kniclo and/or the Farmhand may have been innocent even if C.
       Kniclo morphed into
       the Farmhand or not. Possession of the key might be
       overestimated in terms of his possible
       guilt. See examples Three and Four. Hence, the key as evidence
       of the Farmhand or
       C. Kniclo's guilt is only a requisite for situations One and
       Two.
       Fitzgerald mentions the keys ( for that room) being cast-iron at
       the trial.
       Jennings rejects the brass key, altogether.
       Miniter's eyewitness description remains intact, April 24-June
       30th. Does not match
       Damon's description of the Farmhand.
       #Post#: 5021--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Situations,Scenarios, & Possible Solutions: August 1,
       2025
   DIR By: Kattrup
       Date: August 1, 2025, 1:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A quick remark about 3 and 4: how does Kniclo get blood on him
       if he didn’t kill Brown?
       Blood witnessed by clerk at Glenmore hotel - I’m here assuming
       that C Kniclo was Glenmore Man, apart from the nose the
       description matches completely- and also blood on shirt left
       behind in Cranford, apparently much more blood than could result
       from his ordinary work.
       #Post#: 5022--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Situations,Scenarios, & Possible Solutions: August 1,
       2025
   DIR By: HowBrown1953
       Date: August 1, 2025, 1:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Pete:
       With all due respect, without the shirt being presented along
       with the key, we don't have proof other than Damon's word that
       it was bloody or that he even had a shirt, in the first place.
       The housemaid would have been nice to find for corroboration.
       Some might see the absence of the shirt at the time of Damon's
       coming forward as him expecting to be believed
       since he had a key. Unless 'Mary' was dead, there should have
       been an effort undertaken to find her.
       As to blood on the man who was seen in the Glenmore, while he
       did resemble C. Kniclo, it was not uncommon for stragglers to go
       to the Glenmore at all hours of
       the morning in search of a room. Some had engaged in fights or
       were disheveled through other means. There were quite a few men
       who were picked up who resembled
       C. Kniclo ( Miniter description) during the first 3 days of the
       manhunt for Brown's last paying client. Perhaps Glenmore Man was
       one of them.
       When Damon filed his first affidavit, he made no mention of
       'Henry', the stable hand, stating that the farmhand had blood on
       his person. All we heard was that
       the Farmhand had a rough night, which tells us little.
       It isn't impossible that an innocent C. Kniclo on his way back
       to Cranford by taking a train from Chatham Square got into some
       fisticuffs on the way. An argument on his way
       out of the hotel: on the walk up Catherine Street: or in Chatham
       Square.  Outside options, for sure, but not impossible.
       #Post#: 5023--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Situations,Scenarios, & Possible Solutions: August 1,
       2025
   DIR By: HowBrown1953
       Date: August 1, 2025, 3:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A quick remark about 3 and 4: how does Kniclo get blood on him
       if he didn’t kill Brown?
       Pete:
       I should have just said the following in my post before this
       one, as it relates only to numbers 3 & 4:
       IMHO, the reason for that, within these hypothetical situations,
       is that
       Glenmore Man was someone else, and the existence of the bloody
       shirt is unproven.
       C. Kniclo AND Ali could have both gotten blood on their persons
       in numbers 1 & 2.
       Sorry for any confusion.
       PS:
       If I'm not mistaken, Pete, was the following one of your
       suggestions before?
       FIVE:
       C. Kniclo goes down to the washroom.
       In the interim, Ali goes over to Room 31 and kills Brown.
       He returns to Room 33.
       C. Kniclo returns: sees the corpse- gets some of her blood on
       his person-
       takes his belongings and locks the door upon his departure.
       Another one along the same lines:
       SIX:
       C.Kniclo kills Brown, goes down to the washroom.
       In the interim, Ali goes over and comes into contact with her
       blood.
       C. Kniclo returns for his belongings and leaves, locking the
       door behind
       him.
       Do you have any other possible scenarios?
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1