URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Carrie Brown : Murder In The East River Hotel
  HTML https://carriebrown.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: An Illustrated Encyclopedia:The 1891 Murder Of Carr...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 4300--------------------------------------------------
       Sample #2 From The Illustrated Encyclopedia: The 1891 Murder Of
       Carrie Brown -Borchard, 1932
   DIR By: HowBrown1953
       Date: March 7, 2025, 11:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       BORCHARD, Edwin
       Edwin Montefiore Borchard (October 17, 1884 – July 22, 1951) was
       born in New York City. He was an American international legal
       scholar, jurist, and Sterling Professor at the Yale Law School.
       Was a leading advocate of innocence reform and compensation for
       victims of wrongful conviction as well as the use of declaratory
       judgments, his work in international law emphasized
       non-intervention and neutrality.
       Borchard's 'Convicting the Innocent: Sixty-Five Actual Errors of
       Criminal Justice' ( 1932 ) contained a chapter covering the case
       from 1891 up to Ali's release from prison in 1902 titled, "The
       Key To Room 31".  For many people up until the current decade (
       2020s), Borchard's chapter was the most well-known literature on
       the case.  This chapter of Borchard's book was serialized and
       found in several newspapers during the 1930s.   There are a
       number of errors in the text. Considering it was written 41
       years after the murder, that's understandable.
       ********************************************************************
       THE  KEY  TO  ROOM  31
       "Frenchy" — Ameer  Ben  All.
       On the  southeast  corner  of  Catherine  Slip  and  Water
       Streets,  on  the  Manhattan  water  front  of  the 1890's,
       there  flourished  the  East  River  Hotel,  a squalid  drinking
       place  and  bawdy  resort.  At  nine  o'clock  on Friday
       morning,  April  24,  1891,  the  night  clerk,  Eddie
       Harrington,  made  his  rounds  of  the  hotel  rooms,  routing
       out all  those  who  had  not  already  left.  Most  of  the
       rooms  had been  vacated.  Room  31,  however,  was  still
       locked.  He  rapped lightly — no  reply ;  louder  knocks — no
       reply.  Eddie  applied his  master  key  to  the  door.  Peering
       in,  he  was  petrified  by the  ghastly  sight  of  the
       mutilated  body  of  "Old  Shakespeare," a  dissolute  woman  of
       sixty,  a  habitue  of  the neighborhood.  She  was  a  former
       actress,  and  received  her nickname  because  she  frequently
       quoted  the  Bard's  plays when  tipsy.
       Her  name  was  Carrie  Brown.
       Eddie,  greatly  excited,  rushed  to  the  first  floor  to
       spread the  news  and  call  for  the  police,  who  soon
       arrived,  accompanied by  newspaper  reporters.  The  coroner
       took  charge  of the  body. An  examination  of  the  body
       showed  that  the  woman had been  strangled,  atrociously
       slashed  by  a  filed-down  cooking knife,  which was  found  on
       the  floor  by  the  bed — and  upon her  thigh  was  cut  the
       sign  of  the  cross.  As  a  murder  this was  a  challenge  to
       Chief  Police  Inspector  Thomas  Byrnes, who  was  justly
       proud  of  his  record  for  solving  crime  mysteries. The
       cross  on  the  victim's  thigh  gave  the  case  a  special
       significance.  It  was  the  mark  of  "Jack  the  Ripper,"  the
       notorious London  murderer  who  had  baffled  Scotland  Yard
       by his  nine  brutal  killings  of  women  in  the  streets  of
       London from  December,  1887,  to  January,  1891.  The  New
       York Police  Department  had  chided  the  London  police  about
       the "Ripper"  and  boastfully  let  it  be  known  that  if
       the  latter appeared  in  New  York  with  his  evil  doings,
       he  would  be  in the  "jug"  within  thirty-six  hours.
       On  April  25,  1891,  the  day  after  the  murder,  the  New
       York  newspapers  headlined  the  arrival  of  "Jack  the
       Ripper."  Inspector  Byrnes  and  his  force  concentrated  upon
       solving  the  crime.  Investigation  showed  that  "Old
       Shakespeare" had  arrived  at  the  hotel  at  about  eleven
       o'clock  with a  male  companion  half  her  age,  who  gave  a
       name  which  was written  down  by  the  clerk  as  "C.  Knick."
       They  were  assigned Room  31,  to  which  they  repaired  with
       a  tin  pail  of beer.  Several  of  the  hotel  hang-abouts
       saw  the  man  and  were able  to  supply  descriptions  of
       him: a  medium-sized,  stocky, blond,  seafaring  man.  This
       man  vanished  and  was  never  apprehended. The  police  combed
       the  water  front  for  him  in vain.
       Some  of  "Old  Shakespeare's"  acquaintances  were  found,
       among  them  Mary  Ann  Lopez,  who  had  a  frequent  visitor
       known  in  the  neighborhood  as  "Frenchy."  Although  a
       decided brunet,  Frenchy's  general  appearance  was  otherwise
       not  greatly  different  from  the  description  given  of  the
       man who  spent  the  night  in  Room  31 ;  so  Frenchy  was
       arrested, among  numerous  others,  for  questioning.  He
       professed  not to  be  able  to  speak  English.  Many
       languages  were  tried  on him  until  it  appeared  that  he
       spoke  Algerian  Arabic: he was  an  Algerian  Frenchman,  named
       Ameer  Ben  Ali.
       On  April  25,  Frenchy  was  a  suspect.  On  April  26,  the
       newspapers  carried  a  police  statement  that  he  was
       probably implicated  as  being  a  cousin  of  the  murderer.
       On  Wednesday, April  29,  the  case  was  still  unsettled,
       with  the  police apparently  at  sea.  Detective  Kilcauley  of
       Jersey  City  reported to  the  police  that  a  conductor
       employed  on  the  New Jersey  Central  was  very  sure  he  had
       carried  the  murderer to  Easton  on  his  train.  All  the
       while,  Frenchy  was  kept  in the  star  cell  at  the  police
       station.
       On  April  30,  Inspector  Byrnes  gave  several  reporters  the
       news  that  the  case  against  Frenchy  was  complete,  and
       that the  police  were  convinced  that  he
       was  the  murderer.  It  was admitted  that  Frenchy  was  not
       "Old  Shakespeare's"  companion during  the  fatal  night,  but
       it  was  said  that  Frenchy had  spent  the  night  in  Room
       33,  across  the  hall  from  the murder  chamber,  and  that
       after  the  other  man  had  left, Frenchy  had  crept  across
       the  hall,  robbed  his  victim  and killed  her,  and  then
       crept  back  into  his  own  room.  As sketched  by  the
       Inspector,  the  evidence  against  Frenchy consisted  of  blood
       drops  on  the  floor  of  Room  31  (the  murder chamber),
       and  in  the  hall  between  Rooms  31  and  33 ( Frenchy 's
       room)  ;  blood  marks  on  both  sides  of  the  door  of  33,
       as  if  the  door  had  been  pushed  open  by  bloody  fingers
       and  then  closed ;  blood  marks  on  the  floor  of  Room  33,
       on  a chair  in  that  room,  on  the  bed  blanket,  and  on
       the  bedtick (there  were  no  sheets).  Blood  was  said  to
       have  been  found on  Frenchy's  socks,  and  scrapings  from
       his  finger  nails  indicated the  presence  of  blood.  His
       explanations  as  to  how  the  blood  got  on  him  were
       investigated  and  found  to  be false.  Some  of  Carrie
       Brown's  professional  sisters  said  that Frenchy  consorted
       much  with  "Old  Shakespeare"  and  occupied Room  31  with
       her  only  the  previous  week.
       On  this  same  day  (April  30),  Frenchy,  who  by  this  time
       was  called  Frenchy  No.  1,  to  distinguish  him  from  other
       "Frenchies"  involved  in  the  case,  was  arraigned  before
       Judge  Martine  and  was  formally  committed  to  jail  for
       the  murder.  Since  the  prisoner  was  unable  to  employ
       counsel, Judge  Martine  appointed  Levy,  House  and  Friend
       as  his counsel.  On  May  1,  Frenchy  was  removed  to  the
       Tombs.
       At  about  this  time  it  was  learned  that  the  prisoner
       had served  a  vagrancy  term  in  March  and  April  in  the
       Queens County  Jail  and  that  two  of  his  fellow  prisoners
       there, David  Galloway  and  Edward  Smith,  had  reported  that
       Frenchy  had  a  knife  like  the  one  used  in  the  murder.
       On  Wednesday,  June  24,  1891,  Frenchy's  trial  opened
       before  Recorder  Smyth.  An  interpreter  from  his  own
       Algerian village  had  been  found  in  New  York.  The  state
       was represented  by  Assistant  District  Attorneys  Wellman
       and Simms,  and  the  police  force  by  Inspector  Byrnes  and
       four officers.  In  addition  to  evidence  bearing  upon  the
       facts  as related  by  the  Inspector  to  reporters  on  April
       30,  the  prosecutors called  many  witnesses  from  the  lowest
       stratum  of New  York  life,  to  prove  that  Frenchy  had
       been  living  a sordid  life,  and,  particularly,  that  he
       was  accustomed  to staying  at  the  East  River  Hotel  and
       to  wandering  from room  to  room  at  night.  On
       cross-examination,  the  credibility of  these  witnesses  was
       thoroughly  attacked.
       The  climax  of  the  trial  came  on  Wednesday,  July  1,
       when District  Attorney  Nicoll  himself  took  charge  of  the
       trial  and called  Dr.  Formand  of  Philadelphia  as  an
       expert  witness. Dr.  Formand  testified  that  he  had  made
       tests  of  samples  of the  blood  found  on  the  fatal  bed
       in  Room  31,  in  the  hallway, on  the  door  to  Room  33,
       inside  Room  33,  and  on  Frenchy's socks,  and  found  that
       they  all  contained  intestinal  contents of  food  elements,
       all  in  the  same  degree  of  digestion — all exactly
       identical.  This  led  to  the  direct  inference  that  all  of
       these  bloodstains  resulted  from  blood  flowing  from  the
       abdominal wound  of  the  deceased.  The  Doctor  stated  that
       he would  be  willing  to  risk  his  life  upon  the  accuracy
       of  his tests.  Dr.  Austin  Flint  and  Dr.  Cyrus  Edson
       corroborated Dr.  Formand's  testimony,  and  concluded  the
       case  of  the state  against  Frenchy.
       On  July  8,  the  defense  opened.  After  calling  Constable
       James  R.  Hiland  of  Newtown  to  prove  that  when  Frenchy
       was  arrested,  in  Queens  County,  he  had  no  knife,  the
       defense counsel  put  the  defendant  on  the  stand.  He  was
       asked  about his  life  history,  his  eight  years  of  service
       in  the  French army,  and  his  movements  in  this  country.
       Finally  he  was asked,  "Did  you  kill  Carrie  Brown?"  These
       words  had hardly  been  translated  into  Arabic  when
       Frenchy  jumped to  his  feet,  lifted  his  hands  over  his
       head,  looked  skyward,  and fairly  screamed  in  Arabic — he
       appeared  to  be  having  hysterics. No  one  could  quiet  him.
       Finally  he  sank  back  into  his chair  exhausted,  and  the
       translator  gave  the  gist  of Frenchy's  plea:  "I  am
       innocent.  I  am  innocent,  Allah  il Allah  [God  is  God],  I
       am  innocent.  Allah  Akbar  [God  is great].  I  am  innocent.
       O  Allah,  help  me.  Allah  save  me.  I implore  Allah  to
       help  me."
       Frenchy  made  a  bad  witness,  at  times  appearing  to
       understand English  and  again pretending  not  to  understand
       questions even  when  interpreted  into  his  own  tongue.  He
       consistently denied  killing  "Old  Shakespeare,"  but  he
       became badly  tangled  up  time  and  again  upon
       cross-examination.
       The  defense  called  several  medical  experts  to  testify
       that the  substances  found  in  the  various  blood  exhibits
       did  not necessarily  all  come  from  the  intestine,  but
       that  they  might have  come  from  other  parts  of  the  body.
       Each  of  these  experts, however,  was  forced  to  admit
       that  Dr.  Formand  was at  the  top  of  his  profession  and
       that  they  had  high  regard for  his  opinion.
       The  prosecution  added  an  interesting  bit  of  evidence  by
       showing  that  Frenchy's  tallow  candle  had  been  burned  for
       more  than  an  hour  in  Room  33  on  the  night  of  the
       murder, implying  that  he  had  been  sitting  up  for  some
       definite  purpose. Testimony  was  submitted  to  show  that  he
       left  the  hotel at  five  o'clock  the  following  morning,
       and  that  he  "slinked" out  of  the  door  in  a  guilty
       manner.
       The  jury  soon  returned  a  verdict  of  guilty  of
       second-degree  murder.  The  Inspector  and  the  prosecutors
       were much  disappointed ;  but  it  was  apparent  that  a
       compromise had  been  made  by  the  jury.  On  July  10,  1891,
       Ameer  Ben  Ali  was  sentenced  to  Sing  Sing  for  life. The
       newspapers  and  the  public  had  taken  great  interest in
       the  case.  The  newspapers  reported  fully  the  testimony of
       each  witness  and  the  case  was  avidly  followed  by
       thousands. There  was  little  disapproval  of  the  verdict.
       Newspaper  men,  among  them  Jacob  A.  Riis  and  Charles
       Edward  Russell,  who  had  been  assigned  to  the  case  from
       the very  beginning,  were  far  from  satisfied  that  this
       presented  a true  solution  to  the  murder,  and  felt  that
       it could  never  be unraveled  until  the  police  had  found
       the  man  who  had  gone to  Room  31  with  "Old  Shakespeare."
       However,  the  public authorities  rested  when  Frenchy  went
       to  Sing  Sing  to  spend the  remainder  of  his  days — soon
       to  be  transferred  to  the  hospital for  the  criminal
       insane  at  Matteawan.
       PERSISTENT  rumors  drifted  back  to  New  York  among
       seafaring men  that  the  murderer  had  quietly  gone  to  sea,
       bound for  the  Far  East.  These  tales  could  never  be
       substantiated.
       At  the  turn  of  the  century,  however,  brighter  days  came
       to  the  penniless  Frenchy.  An  application  for  a  pardon
       on his  behalf,  based  upon  new  evidence,  was  submitted  to
       Governor Odell.  It  was  established  that  just  prior  to
       the  murder a  man  answering  the  description  of  the
       murdered woman's  companion  had  been  working  for  several
       weeks  at  Cranford,  New  Jersey,  that  this  man  was  absent
       from  Cranford  on  the  night  of  the  murder,  and  that
       several  days thereafter  he  disappeared  entirely.  In  his
       abandoned  room was  found  a  brass  key  bearing  a  tag  31
       and a bloody  shirt.  From  evidence  previously  adduced,  it
       was  quite certain  that  the  murderer  had  locked  the  room
       when  he  left it.  There  never  was  any  evidence  to
       connect  Frenchy  with the  key.  The  principal  evidence
       against  Frenchy  had  been the  reported  bloody  trail
       between  the  two  rooms,  which,  even as  testified  to  at
       the  trial,  consisted  of  very  small  and  faint blood
       marks.  There  were  submitted  to  Governor  Odell  numerous
       affidavits  of  disinterested  persons,  described  by  the
       Governor  as  "persons  of  credit,  some  of  whom  had  had
       experience in  the  investigation  of  crime,"  to  the  effect
       that these  persons  had  visited  the  hotel  room  on  the
       morning  following the  murder,  and  prior  to  the  arrival
       of  the  coroner, and  that  after  careful  examination  they
       had  found  no  blood on  the  door  of  either  room  or  in
       the  hallway.  It  was  to  be inferred  that  the  bloodstains,
       found  by  the  police  on  the second  day  following  the
       murder,  had  been  made  at  the  time of  the  visit  of  the
       coroner  and  the  crowd  of  reporters  when the  body  was
       examined  and  removed.  It  was  further  pointed out  that
       even  according  to  the  police  testimony  there  was  no
       blood  on  or  near  the  lock  or  knob  of  the  door  to  the
       murder chamber  which  the  murderer  presumably  unlocked,
       opened, closed,  and  relocked.  This  new  evidence  in  the
       Governor's opinion  demolished  the  case  against  Frenchy.
       The  application  for  executive  clemency  was  based  solely
       upon  the  ground  that  Frenchy  was  innocent.  The  Governor
       concluded  his  report  on  the  case,  after  reviewing  the
       facts, as  follows :  "To  refuse  relief  under  such
       circumstances  would be  plainly  a  denial  of  justice,  and
       after  a  very  careful  consideration of  all  the  facts  I
       have  reached  the  conclusion  that it  is  clearly  my  duty
       to  order  the  prisoner's  release."
       Frenchy 's  sentence  was  commuted  on  April  16,  1902,  and
       it  is  understood  that  the  French  Government  arranged  for
       his  transportation  back  to  his  native  Algerian  village.
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/K0uLNfH.png
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1