URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Carrie Brown : Murder In The East River Hotel
  HTML https://carriebrown.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 1396--------------------------------------------------
       Media Disparagement of Met and Possible Provocation 
   DIR By: guest5
       Date: March 7, 2023, 5:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       My theory of Main or Major or Possible Motive was Provocation
       from the police through the media. Suspect C Kniclo, at least,
       likely came from or went through London and England, and shipped
       with Englanders and Londoners. Why wouldn't they be provoked?
       I looked for press reports slagging the London Met and London
       police that were closer to 1891. The quotes attributed to Byrnes
       was way back in October of 1888. He wasn't even the worst as far
       as it goes. Superintendent William Murray was supposedly worse.
       That was still 1888 though so too far back to be remembered
       enough to cause provocation in 1891.
       But I did find in a Wolf V dissertation that there were
       newspaper reports later on that out-and-out called the Met
       stupid and they go up to at least July 1889 with Alice
       McKenzie's murder.
       Could there have been more media attacks after Frances Coles in
       1891?
  HTML https://www.casebook.org/dissertations/rn-nya2.html
       #Post#: 1397--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Media Disparagement of Met and Possible Provocation 
   DIR By: HowBrown1953
       Date: March 7, 2023, 7:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       1. My theory of Main or Major or Possible Motive was Provocation
       from the police through the media. Suspect C Kniclo, at least,
       likely came from or went through London and England, and shipped
       with Englanders and Londoners. Why wouldn't they be provoked?
       2. I looked for press reports slagging the London Met and London
       police that were closer to 1891. The quotes attributed to Byrnes
       were way back in October of 1888. He wasn't even the worst as
       far as it goes. Superintendent William Murray was supposedly
       worse. That was still 1888 though so too far back to be
       remembered enough to cause provocation in 1891.
       3. Could there have been more media attacks after Frances Coles
       in 1891?
       ***************************************************************
       1. I don't understand what you're trying to get across.  Are you
       suggesting that C. Kniclo, because he supposedly came from
       London, was somehow provoked by the remarks made by NYPD
       personages and committed murder as a result ?  Or are you saying
       that the Met was irritated that the NYPD broke their balls for
       their inability to apprehend the Whitechapel Murderer ?
       2. Inspector Murray did make some flippant remarks ( NYPD track
       record vs. any other constabulary was second to none, so he felt
       he had bragging rights......still happens today, means nothing,
       and is forgotten shortly afterwards).  New York papers, like
       Pulitzer's NY Evening World, had one edition featuring a sketch
       of Byrnes sweating while officers from European cities stood
       behind him bemused.
       The real ball buster was Ali trial Judge Smyth. He said the
       London police were blockheads.
       3. I personally don't recall any terms of endearment being
       published in NYC papers in the 10 week period between the Coles'
       murder and Brown's.  I'll give it the once over twice tomorrow
       to see if anything was overlooked.
       
       #Post#: 1398--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Media Disparagement of Met and Possible Provocation 
   DIR By: HowBrown1953
       Date: March 8, 2023, 7:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I found 5 articles of note which comment on the London ( Met)
       Police between February 13 and March 21st, 1891.
       I also included the NY Herald article from October 3rd, 1888 in
       which Judge Smyth, British-born criminal attorney William Howe,
       and others chime in on the Whitechapel case.
       Articles in order :
       1. New York Evening World  Friday       February 13, 1891
       2. New York Sun                Sunday       February 15, 1891
       3. New York Times             Sunday       February 15, 1891
       4. New York World             Sunday       March 8th, 1891
       5. New York Sun                Saturday     March 21, 1891
       6. NY Herald                     Wednesday  October 3, 1888
       #Post#: 1399--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Media Disparagement of Met and Possible Provocation 
   DIR By: HowBrown1953
       Date: March 8, 2023, 5:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A few articles post-murder referring Whitechapel or London
       In two PDFs
       1.       NY Tribune April 23, 1891
       2-5.    NY tribune April 25, 1891
       6.       NY Tribune  April 29, 1891
       Part One below
       #Post#: 1400--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Media Disparagement of Met and Possible Provocation 
   DIR By: HowBrown1953
       Date: March 8, 2023, 5:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Part Two below
       #Post#: 1401--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Media Disparagement of Met and Possible Provocation 
   DIR By: HowBrown1953
       Date: March 8, 2023, 6:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       One more for the road.
       San Francisco Examiner
       December 28, 1890
       ******************
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/LUkfpk4.jpg
       #Post#: 1402--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Media Disparagement of Met and Possible Provocation 
   DIR By: guest5
       Date: March 8, 2023, 7:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       5. New York Sun                Saturday     March 21, 1891
       This article is a good example. A young Englishman barely just
       arrived in the US, kept hearing how the American detectives were
       so good and would have caught the Ripper in no time, decided to
       pick on a detective and play a practical joke on him.
       He gave false information on the Ruttinger Murder Mystery in NY
       claiming William Wright conspired with a thug from Birmingham
       named Big Joe Welsh, and Capt. Blake of Staten Island followed
       up on it, even making inquires in England.
       Byrnes took over that case according to the article. It seems
       the Englishman played the same prank more than once.
  HTML http://www.murderbygaslight.com/2019/02/the-ruttinger-mystery.html
       #Post#: 1403--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Media Disparagement of Met and Possible Provocation 
   DIR By: guest5
       Date: March 8, 2023, 7:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The New York Times is so "bad" in this regard. By comparison,
       the Sun just says the London Police are "soreheads" and have no
       manpower.
       New York Times Sunday February 15 1891
       It is by no means clear that this tenth Whitechapel murder is by
       the same hand as the others, but there is enough similarity to
       make ascription to Jack the Ripper natural. If anything, there
       is more excitement in East London over this newest addition to
       the list than there was when the last occurred, in September
       1889. Of course, there are a multitude of theories advanced, and
       it seems that several people really saw the man who it is
       assumed is the murderer talking with his victim. But such a mass
       of ignorant liars always turns up on such occasions that it is
       difficult to choose between the varying descriptions given of
       the suspected man, and nobody dreams of expecting that the
       police will track down the miscreant. The policeman who
       discovered the body did hear retreating footsteps after he
       realized it was a murder, but it did not occur to him to pursue.
       The explanation given that he is a young man from the country
       only six weeks on the force is accepted as satisfactory by
       everybody.
       There is also much doubt whether the man arrested to-day is
       guilty of yesterday's crime, let alone the others. The police
       here, so far from giving information, think it sagacious to deny
       everything, and hence there are no means of corroborating or
       checking the rumors of which the town is full. Even if the
       prisoner proves to be Jack the Ripper, his arrest will give no
       credit to the police, for he had actually been stopped this
       morning by a Sergeant, questioned, and allowed to go away before
       a civilian's suspicions caused his apprehension.
       #Post#: 1404--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Media Disparagement of Met and Possible Provocation 
   DIR By: HowBrown1953
       Date: March 9, 2023, 3:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This article is a good example. A young Englishman barely just
       arrived in the US, kept hearing how the American detectives were
       so good and would have caught the Ripper in no time, decided to
       pick on a detective and play a practical joke on him.
       I fail to to see how some guy playing a joke and getting caught
       at it...is the same as someone committing a murder in NYC in
       which there is zero evidence that the murder was part of a plan
       to show up the NYPD based on a few newspaper reports critical of
       the Met.
       Besides, the snide remarks found in a few NYC newspapers weren't
       found in all or even a majority of available NYC papers
       #Post#: 1405--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Media Disparagement of Met and Possible Provocation 
   DIR By: HowBrown1953
       Date: March 9, 2023, 3:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Fall River Globe
       April 25, 1891
       ************
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/HOkKQJI.jpg
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page