URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Carrie Brown : Murder In The East River Hotel
  HTML https://carriebrown.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 5638--------------------------------------------------
       The Scapegoat Of Circumstances
   DIR By: HowBrown1953
       Date: October 16, 2025, 3:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ali spent 17 days in Sing Sing ( a real prison ) in 1891...and
       for a brief spell in September 1893.
       He spent 17 months in Auburn Prison....July 1891 to January
       1893.
       A total of 1 1/2 years of the 11 he served in a real prison.
       He spent a little over 7 months in Matteawan Asylum in 1893. He
       would spend 7 years and two months
       at Mattewan ( 1893-1900 ). He spent 17 months in Dannemora
       Prison Asylum ( Nov. 1900 to his release in April 1902).
       A total of 9 and 1/2 years out of the 11 he spent incarcerated
       were in asylums...not in prisons.
       In this lurid piece, it is first stated:
       "judicial methods that railroaded him to prison..."
       Then we see:
       "...an accidental miscarriage of justice.."
       Finally:
       " ( the) murder of Old Shakespeare necessitated an immediate
       victim.."
       So....which was it, Evening World? An accidental miscarriage of
       justice, or was he railroaded?  ;D ;D
       New York Evening World
       April 17, 1902
       ************
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/oIDuR0u.png
       #Post#: 7546--------------------------------------------------
       Re: The Scapegoat Of Circumstances
   DIR By: HowBrown1953
       Date: October 5, 2026, 4:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "FRENCHY'S" RELEASE FROM PRISON.   If there is enough of
       "Frenchy's" mind left for him to cherish a grudge he will emerge
       from his eleven years' confinement behind prison bars justly
       embittered against judicial methods that railroaded him to
       prison for a crime of which he was innocent.
       He is fortunate, of course, to get his freedom at all, even
       thus delayed, but what recompense is there for the liberty of
       which the State has deprived him?
       To take eleven years from a man's life, while condemning him to
       brood all that long while on the injustice done him, is a very
       grievous wrong—an accidental miscarriage of justice, but one
       nonetheless severe to its luckless victim.
       As for what prison life is, hear the testimony of Wardman
       Bissert released yesterday:
       Being locked up in a cell doing nothing is horrible, horrible.
       I will never be able to understand how a man can go out after
       serving one term in that awful place and then
       commit another crime. Only a lunatic would do it. I'd rather
       face the horrors of hell than be locked up there again. It would
       make a madman of me.
       Bissert was in only seventeen weeks. Fancy the mental
       condition of a man confined for eleven years, knowing that he is
       innocent, but powerless to help himself!
       Poverty was "Frenchy's" real crime. A little lump of ready
       cash with its purchasing power in legal talent would have
       averted his misfortune,
       or at least kept him in the not uncomfortable custody of the
       county jail until his innocence had been established.
       He was the scapegoat of circumstances. The occurrence of the
       "Jack-the-Ripper" like murder of "Old Shakespeare" necessitated
       an immediate victim to sustain the prestige of the Police
       Department and make good its boast that the series of atrocious
       crimes in London, of which this was imitative,
       could not be paralleled here. Fate put "Frenchy" in the way,
       and he paid the penalty.
       *************************************************************************************************
       Ali spent seventeen days in Sing Sing in 1891. He returned on
       September 11th, 1893, but went back to Matteawan shortly
       afterward.
       To me, the most significant part of this article is the absence
       of any mention of why Ali remained in jail: George Damon. The
       author of this piece accepted
       the Damon story. To him, and just about everyone else, Damon was
       the reason for Ali's eventual freedom, but instead he chose to
       blame the quality of Ali's legal
       counsel and the canard of a need to preserve the reputation of
       the NYPD for Ali's predicament.
       If there were doubters, as there definitely are today, of the
       veracity of Damon's story, we don't see it published in the
       contemporary papers for the simple reason that it didn't exist.
       It would be easier to sell ice to an Eskimo than to find one
       article that critiqued the Farmhand story. While two out-of-town
       papers criticized Damon for not coming forward earlier, their
       criticism was not directed toward the alleged evidence, but at
       his reticence.
       The New York Sun was the only New York paper to rival the
       World & Evening World for case coverage. IMHO, the fact that the
       Sun avoided criticizing Damon is self-evident.
       Four of their reporters or former reporters filed affidavits
       in favor of Ali's release. The Evening World was only rivaled by
       the NY Journal for sensational news stories.
       
       
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1