DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Cape Independence
HTML https://capexit.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Cape History
*****************************************************
#Post#: 27--------------------------------------------------
Whites Stole Land ?
By: Hawk Date: March 17, 2018, 5:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Article View by D Lötter
Next time some one tells you the whites stole land - Here is
your short history lesson
Story Link
HTML http://www.breeknuusza.com/next-time-some-one-tells-you-the-whites-stole-land-here-is-your-short-history-lesson-by-d-lotter/
[img]
HTML https://i1.wp.com/www.breeknuusza.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/janvanriebeeck1.jpg?w=533[/img]
In the 3000 years since the end of the Stone Age, the indigenous
people of Africa could not manage to create an infrastructure,
could not mine or produce export, could, in fact not succeed in
building anything higher than one storey and could not write
down anything as reference for future generations, because they
could not manage to master the art of writing. In fact, when the
first Europeans arrived on 6 April 1652 it was 1974 years after
Ptolemy I built the magnificent library of Alexandria – and in
Southern Africa the indigenous people still could do no more
than a few rock paintings and a clay pot with patterns on it.
Today, this development, this contribution of the descendants of
Europe has become a threat to the Black South African. He cannot
compare. He has no contribution that can remotely compare to
what the white man created and therefore he has to fall back on
what primal instinct tells him to do: Destroy that which is a
threat to you! It is against this background that the white
South African is demonised as a slaver and murderer who stole
land. Let us put this in perspective:
In the first place: The Europeans who came with Van Riebeeck had
no intention to stay at the Cape. We can clearly determine this
from the repeated application for transfer to Batavia or
Amsterdam made by almost every Company servant. The few men who
decided to make this their homeland, did so because they came to
love the land.
They wanted to develop and grow here. And in the written
evidence, left us by the men who did not intend to stay and
therefore had no reason to lie, it is written down over and over
again that the Europeans settled on uninhabited land. They
exchanged land for cattle and money and traded with the nomadic
indigenous people.
The Company decided to import slaves.
I emphasize import, because no indigenous person in this country
was ever put into slavery! In actual fact, the slaves who were
brought in from Madagascar and Batavia and Ceylon and East
Africa were the ancestors of an entirely new group of people:
the Coloured nation of South Africa who adopted the customs and
culture of the European.
Ever wondered why they did not adopt the custom of Africa?
Because they were not exposed to it, that is why! Nobody at the
Cape ever set eyes on a black person for 130 years before the
first Trekboere met the Xhosa in the Valleys of the Amatola
around 1770! These slaves also added to the bloodline of the
European settlers, as did the French Hugenots of 1688 and the
British Settlers of 1820. The White South African was a new
nation, born in Africa. This nation called its language,
Afrikaans, after Africa. This nation called itself after Africa
– Afrikaners.
On the first of December 1834 slavery was abolished in the Cape
Colony. This is two years before the start of the Great Trek.
The white man in South Africa knew nothing of the existence of
the Zulu, the Tswana, the Sotho, the Venda…and he was at war
with the Xhosa. It is chronologically impossible that indigenous
people could be held in slavery, if the so-called slave masters
did not even know of their existence before the abolition of
slavery.
Let us look at the “great” Shaka Zulu and the Zulu nation.
Remember that the Europeans landed in South Africa in 1652.
Shaka kaSenzaghakohona was born around 1787. He managed to
unite, through force and murder and rampage a number of small
tribes into the Zulu nation around 1819. Before that year, there
WAS no Zulu people. A question of mathematics: The Zulu nation
came into existence only 167 years after the arrival of Van
Riebeeck. What logic can possibly argue that the Europeans took
anything away from the Zulu-people?
So when did the black man establish himself in South Africa and
how? The answer lies in the Mfecane: Mfecane (Zulu:
[m̩fɛˈkǀaːne],[note 1] crushing), also
known by the Sesotho name Difaqane (scattering, forced dispersal
or forced migration[1]) or Lifaqane, was a period of widespread
chaos and warfare among indigenous ethnic communities in
southern Africa during the period between 1815 and about 1840.
As King Shaka created the militaristic Zulu Kingdom in the
territory between the Tugela River and Pongola River, his forces
caused a wave of warfare and disruption to sweep to other
peoples. This was the prelude of the Mfecane, which spread from
there. The movement of peoples caused many tribes to try to
dominate those in new territories, leading to widespread
warfare; consolidation of other groups, such as the Matabele,
the Mfengu and the Makololo; and the creation of states such as
the modern Lesotho.
Mfecane is used primarily to refer to the period when Mzilikazi,
a king of the Matabele, dominated the Transvaal. During his
reign, roughly from 1826 to 1836, he ordered widespread killings
and devastation to remove all opposition. He reorganised the
territory to establish the new Ndebele order. The death toll has
never been satisfactorily determined, but the whole region
became nearly depopulated. Normal estimates for the death toll
range from 1 million to 2 million.
The black man established himself in this barren land now known
as South Africa a full 174 years AFTER the white man. How dare
you then call me a settler when you are nothing more? If I don’t
belong here, certainly neither do you.
Land stolen from the black man? No. The land occupied by the
Boer-people was land that nobody lived on, for the pure and
simple reason that the original people of South Africa were
massacred and wiped out in a racist genocide by the ancestors of
the current black population of South Africa. The very same
thing that is now repeated with the white man. The white man has
a full and legal and historical claim to his part of this
country, including land. And the black man who disputes that is
welcome to bring evidence of the contrary. Remember, popular
liberal myth, propagandistic expressions and loud shouting and
burning and looting to hide your own incapability is not
evidence. It is barbarism.
The popular myth of “the end of colonialism” is a lie also.
Colonialism in South Africa ended on 31 May 1961 when the
country became a Republic. White minority rule was not
colonialism, because the white South African belongs here – you
cannot colonise your own country.
The entire uproar about white oppression and white guilt and
white debt is based, exactly like the concept of the rainbow
nation and its Africa-democracy, on one big lie. In Afrikaans, a
language of Africa, we say: However swiftly the lie might
travel, truth will catch up one day.
Black South Africa might as well realise that the time of the
lie is running out. Your stereotyping of the white man and
apartheid as the cause of everything, cannot hold much longer.
You cannot hide rotting meat under gift wrap for eternity.
Some time in the very near future you will have to own up and
explain how you could hold a small minority of oppressed people
responsible for the disaster that you have made of a country
which has the potential of being a place of safety, a welcome
and hospitable home, to all its children whether they be black,
white, coloured on Indian.
The black man holds the key to the final destruction of what is
left, or the final realisation that we have no other choice but
to peacefully co-exist. The black South African can no longer
avoid admitting that the destruction of the white South African
necessarily means the destruction of everything and everyone
left on the southern tip of Africa.
*****************************************************