URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Burlington Book Study
  HTML https://burlingtonbookstudy.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to:  Class 2011
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 41--------------------------------------------------
       Checking For Understanding Chap 1-2
   DIR By: mdavidson
       Date: June 20, 2011, 9:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I found the part about students learning how to monitor their
       own understanding after being in classrooms where teachers check
       understanding consistently.  Sometimes it is easy to assume that
       students can and do automatically monitor their learning.
       However, I've come to know that this isn't the case.  Some
       simply do not develop these skills on their own.  The idea of
       pairing such students with students who have these skills
       developed seems like a simple yet effective strategy in
       providing them with effective models. This also reminds us that
       there is much to be said for having 'lower' students in with
       'higher' students for learning activities. I believe they can
       learn much from the their peers.
       #Post#: 42--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Checking For Understanding Chap 1-2
   DIR By: Susie
       Date: June 20, 2011, 2:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I liked the reminder about Understanding By Design, which I
       initially used after I took the class, but have been less
       dilligent about doing.  Also the guidelines for "Accountable
       Talk" made a great deal of sense.  The rubrics for retelling
       fiction and informational texts look very good.  I wonder how I
       can tie some of this in with the new reading period.  I
       especially like the share partner's ideas--if nothing else, this
       will require active listening.  But I think it will also be a
       useful technique for students to have as it is used more often
       in adult settings.  That particular technique was actually used
       last weekend at the Wyoming Writers pre-session, requiring us to
       introduce ourselves to one other person, interview that person,
       then introduce that person to the group.  It was a great
       reminder about listening skills.  It was far too easy to get
       caught up in the other person's story and forget to take notes.
       Focusing on the purpose is necessary.
       #Post#: 44--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Checking For Understanding Chap 1-2
   DIR By: Karen
       Date: June 20, 2011, 4:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This was very interesting to read about the different methods of
       checking for understanding.  I haven't experienced most of the
       methods written about.  Mostly I have encountered (and used) the
       questions mentioned at the very beginning, and the
       initiate-respond-evaluate method.  I realized they were not
       always effective, but knew no other way.  Now the hard part is
       how do I take what I am reading and implement it into real life
       teaching situations?
       #Post#: 46--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Checking For Understanding Chap 1-2
   DIR By: Julie
       Date: June 21, 2011, 8:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Pairing students into learning partners is really a difficult
       task.  It is easy to say that the high students should be with a
       lower student, but that isn't the only trait that you need to be
       concerned with in pairing students.  You also have to consider
       whether the high student will ask questions to really find out
       what the low student does know.  Sometimes the low students will
       just give up when placed with a high student because they feel
       intimidated.  Giving students guided questions to use in their
       pair shares becomes very important so that each partner can
       answer.  You also have to know when it is better to have the
       high student answer first to model for the lower student and
       when it is better to have the lower student answer first so that
       they can give the obvious answer and then hear an answer that
       they might not have considered.  I think that it was Kevin
       Feldman that talked about this and made the reference of low
       hanging fruit. That we should make it easy for our struggling
       learners to give an answer either the obvious one or one that is
       modeled. I try to use sentence starters also to give the
       students the support they might need in answering questions.  In
       the primary grades I believe that we need to do more modeling,
       but it can't be done without two teachers.  So. how would that
       work?  Any ideas?  Maybe we could use some of the awesome subs
       who are taking this class!  The kids need to hear good partner
       sharing throughout the year.
       #Post#: 47--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Checking For Understanding Chap 1-2
   DIR By: Carol Powers
       Date: June 21, 2011, 9:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I agree with Julie's comment. Some higher students do a very
       effective job of pair sharing, but then there are those that
       want to be the only one that shares or else they soemtimes make
       their partners feel inadequate and stupid.  I agree that more
       teacher modeling would be effective.  I need to take the time at
       the beginning of the year and then I wouldn't waste the
       student's time correcting them on how to do it.  I think it is
       easier to pair share in reading and math.  I don't do as much in
       science or social studies because of time.  I really liked the
       idea of the Whip around.
       #Post#: 48--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Checking For Understanding Chap 1-2
   DIR By: Margaret
       Date: June 21, 2011, 12:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       These are some really good idea, some I am familiar with but
       several are new to me.  I especially like the idea of using
       small groups to explore the reason that an answer may be either
       correst or incorrect.  This would surely help students feel more
       at ease about sharing.
       #Post#: 49--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Checking For Understanding Chap 1-2
   DIR By: Adrian
       Date: June 21, 2011, 1:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is really good information.  I wonder how this can be
       implemented retroactivelly for the benefit of many of the adults
       I know.  I can't count the number of times I have heard "I hear
       what your saying," as only a somewhat polite way of getting back
       to that person's viewpoint.  The fact is, they haven't been
       listening at all, just planning their next comment.  I am as
       guilty as anyone.  I guess my hope is, that if these strategies
       can be taught to a new generation, maybe more effective
       communication can be achieved.  You may be able to tell, I don't
       view these communitaction techniques as only useful in checking
       for understanding in school.
       #Post#: 50--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Checking For Understanding Chap 1-2
   DIR By: Patsie
       Date: June 21, 2011, 4:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have been exposed as a student to this way of teaching and it
       is effective at any age I would say. I have also observed it
       done and always enjoy the process. I haven't much practise in
       implementing it but look forward to doing so when I can. It does
       make the subject more interesting and you are much more apt to
       pay attention.
       #Post#: 51--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Checking For Understanding Chap 1-2
   DIR By: Hans
       Date: June 22, 2011, 9:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry this is so late.  For week 2, on "How We Teach," I
       appreciated the fact that there is really nothing new under the
       sun.  Right now I'm working in Powell with the high school
       summer school program.  Recently, Powell had a large infusion of
       money and decided to use it to purchase Ipads for every teacher
       in the district - AND every middle and high school student.
       Everyone knows that these are supposed to generate good lessons,
       and some kind of alternative learning, but nobody seems to have
       a clearly defined idea of just how that's supposed to work.  I'm
       not against technology, far from it, but I question how giving
       every student expensive technology is going to help increase
       student achievement in any measurable way.  The model we have
       been hammered with for the past 50+ years was and is still the
       most effective way to teach.  Clear objectives, build background
       knowledge, chunks in lessons with guided practice opportunities
       at regular intervals, and informal assessment on a continual
       basis.  I think the problems arise with the common lesson plans
       and core standards.  It can be very difficult to get teachers on
       the same page academically.  We are stubborn creatures, and
       usually think our way of doing things is best.  Teacher
       innovation and creativity are great things, but must not be
       sacrificed to student learning and growth on the larger stage.
       #Post#: 52--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Checking For Understanding Chap 1-2
   DIR By: Anne
       Date: June 22, 2011, 9:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have occasionally tried a different kind of checking for
       understanding in kindergarten. One example is acting out a story
       that was read and that was quite familiar such as a folk tale
       like the Three Billy Goats Gruff. This didn't take as much time
       as I thought it might because the only prop I needed was readily
       available as a little wooden bridge. When I was reading the part
       in the chapter about retelling I thought of this experience.
       Once the children were near the little wooden bridge I assigned
       parts and scaffolded help in acting out the story. It was
       illuminating to me to see who could easily act out and remember
       the  phrases from the story and who had trouble. I saw the need
       for more chances to practice modeling complete sentences and
       thought that on occasion this method of retelling could have
       great application in my classroom to practice the skill of
       summarizing at an age appropriate level. It doesn't have much
       application for retelling articles but for stories, I found it
       helpful when I could find a few minutes of time.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page