DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Blacraft
HTML https://blacraft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Blacraft General
*****************************************************
#Post#: 1128--------------------------------------------------
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
DIR By: b-ong
Date: March 16, 2013, 4:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
3. yqt never claimed the place.
4a. i felt that that page did not have enough huge images
4b. (this is the nike one i ausse) i was telling you to just do
it (make the poll)
4c. yeah i get it i deleted the post
5. oh really? i still remember you shouting at me for the same
reasons you do now
6. no, 5 and 6 are the same thing, not seperate. they are
refering to the same idea
7. Do not insult He
8. it's called people who lose likke re-matches
9. no, Bla said he would draw borders around where we built.
10. i changed it many times
11. same concept
summary so far:
i have to work on:
not griefing--
wait i just realized i had an argument for that.
#Post#: 1138--------------------------------------------------
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
DIR By: smjjames
Date: March 16, 2013, 7:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: b-ong link ---
>
> 3. yqt never claimed the place.
> 4a. i felt that that page did not have enough huge images
> 4b. (this is the nike one i ausse) i was telling you to just
do it (make the poll)
> 4c. yeah i get it i deleted the post
> 5. oh really? i still remember you shouting at me for the same
reasons you do now
> 6. no, 5 and 6 are the same thing, not seperate. they are
refering to the same idea
> 7. Do not insult He
> 8. it's called people who lose likke re-matches
> 9. no, Bla said he would draw borders around where we built.
> 10. i changed it many times
> 11. same concept
>
>
> summary so far:
>
> i have to work on:
>
> not griefing--
> wait i just realized i had an argument for that.
>
--- End Quote ---
Do you have an argument for everything? Seems like it. Anyways,
I'll do some responses.
3. Just because it's not officially claimed doesn't give you the
right to grief it like that. (IMO, just doing the cactus would
have been enough of a prank back.)
4a. Did you ever think that maybe the reason why it doesn't have
any huge images is because nobody likes them? Good thing that
massive images don't break the forum Ubox uses.
4b. You could have used the small one and stopped right there or
used a screenshot size version, not a mega image.
4c. You seem to have missed Darvs point about the images, also
you didn't delete those images. Also for 4c, which post?
5 & 6. Your friend stuffhappens, who knows you irl, says you
don't have ADHD. Also, you tried to use ADHD as an excuse. I
have ADHD but I don't go around using it as an excuse. Having
ADHD =/= being annoying as you can be annoying without having
ADHD.
7. Uh, what's that all about? I thought it was just some
silly/annoying thing and I thought you were referring to Dan
Dixon sometimes.
9 & 10. You changed it many times? Oh really? You never made any
changes to the contested claim, in fact, at one point there was
an offer to split the penninsula, and did you take it? No. I was
pratically screaming for you to compromise. Stuffhappens tried
to compromise a couple of times, and you? No, you tried to do
everything you could to keep the whole thing.
11. Oh really, and what do you think would have been the social
consequence of stealing someones account name? Good thing you
lost the fucking password because you in fact were planning on
logging into it and keeping me from getting it back. (and YES I
should have registered it long ago, but that's not the point).
AND a good thing that the freenode staff couldn't do anything
about it.
#Post#: 1139--------------------------------------------------
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
DIR By: b-ong
Date: March 16, 2013, 9:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
3. um, kip made giant cobble pillars too, and soviet japan
4.okay i get the poitn! no more large images [reslved]
5. i said it was an excuse? i was explaining why i acted that
way
7. seems liek darvince is outvoted on that one!
9-10. okay oaky! i'll check back in the older post
11. i tell you, sudden burst of being extremely mad with the
knowledge makes a bad combination for me.
#Post#: 1141--------------------------------------------------
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
DIR By: smjjames
Date: March 16, 2013, 9:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I didn't mean to sound extremely mad, but yeah I'm still a
little pissed about it. Well, not that pissed, but I didn't like
it either :P
Probably also got into a little bit of a rant at the frustration
about it.
#Post#: 1143--------------------------------------------------
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
DIR By: b-ong
Date: March 16, 2013, 9:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
i'm happy words are censored here
#Post#: 1144--------------------------------------------------
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
DIR By: smjjames
Date: March 16, 2013, 9:25 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
As for the cobble pillars and stuff, it was a prank (which
doubled as a doomsday 2012 joke) which the three of us (me,
kipz, and yqt) did because you and stuffhappens were refusing to
compromise over the area.
#Post#: 1145--------------------------------------------------
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
DIR By: b-ong
Date: March 16, 2013, 9:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
okay, pretend you and an someone (kipz would do) is battling
over a land that you really, really want.
would you want yqt, me, and stuffhappens to come over and catify
the area along with cobble pillers?
o, a doomsday joke. wow nice excuse smj
#Post#: 1146--------------------------------------------------
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
DIR By: smjjames
Date: March 16, 2013, 9:33 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The doomsday joke was an afterthought, and I think it may have
been kipzs idea.
Admittedly and in hindsight, it was probably overboard since it
would have been greifing but technically it wasn't officially
claimed. AND it was sanctioned by yqt.
It was a stupid thing to do and at the time, we were frustrated
with you two not compromising and so it was on impulse.
#Post#: 1148--------------------------------------------------
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
DIR By: b-ong
Date: March 16, 2013, 9:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
hey you know what that reminds me of? me.
the only difference: i was banned, you weren't.
#Post#: 1149--------------------------------------------------
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
DIR By: smjjames
Date: March 16, 2013, 9:40 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I get that and honestly it was a joke that went overboard
with the pillars.
It was also YOUR CHOICE to grief back, however, it seems like
both sides might be at fault here to some extent.
*****************************************************
Page 6 of 9
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page