URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 85439--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ryan Dempster
       By: craig Date: July 26, 2012, 2:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Heh, all four seem to apply to me.  Definitely #2.  He certainly
       indicated that he'd be traded, there's strong indication that he
       communicated with Theo/Hoyer that Atlanta was pretty positive.
       Sure seems to me that he misled management and is very deserving
       of criticism for doing that.  We can wonder how badly he misled
       management, but we know he very much misled the fans.  Bonk
       bonk.  That said, #4 applies (who knows what other layers
       apply), #3 applies (he had the right, so can't fault him for
       that).  But rights don't make it right to mislead.
       #Post#: 85441--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ryan Dempster
       By: DelMarFan Date: July 26, 2012, 2:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       All of them, but mostly 4.  Like P2, I agree with what JR said,
       but a part of me feels some of #2 as well.
       #Post#: 85448--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ryan Dempster
       By: Cubsin Date: July 26, 2012, 3:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I voted for #2. There's all sorts of evidence that Theo and Jed
       had in-depth conversations with Dempster, then built their
       entire trade deadline strategy around his expressed wishes.
       Whether he lied from the outset, got cold feet or just felt like
       being the hammer doesn't matter to me. He said he'd do what was
       best for the Cubs, then didn't. I have no respect for Ryan
       Dempster. He doesn't deserve to be a Chicago Cub.
       #Post#: 85452--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ryan Dempster
       By: brjones Date: July 26, 2012, 4:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Cubsin link=topic=80.msg85448#msg85448
       date=1343334903]
       I voted for #2. There's all sorts of evidence that Theo and Jed
       had in-depth conversations with Dempster, then built their
       entire trade deadline strategy around his expressed wishes.
       Whether he lied from the outset, got cold feet or just felt like
       being the hammer doesn't matter to me. He said he'd do what was
       best for the Cubs, then didn't. I have no respect for Ryan
       Dempster. He doesn't deserve to be a Chicago Cub.
       [/quote]
       That would be a defensible position if we knew that Dempster had
       gone back on what he said.  But the fact is, no one here knows
       what Dempster said to Theo and Jed.  Again, for all we know, he
       told them that he'd be likely to go to any of several
       contenders, but would wait until the deadline after all
       conversations with the Dodgers had been exhausted before he'd
       accept another deal.  Until we have anything that remotely
       indicates Dempster told the front office that he'd immediately
       accept any offer they presented to him, I think you have to make
       huge, possibly incorrect assumptions to decide he lied or went
       back on his word.
       I selected option #4, because we just don't have the information
       to make the judgment that he went back on his word.  But #3 is
       also a good choice, because the statements to the media that we
       do have left it vague as to whether or not he'd reject a trade.
       I don't blame the media (it's not their fault someone on the
       Braves side failed to keep their mouth shut).
       #Post#: 85453--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ryan Dempster
       By: Jes Beard Date: July 26, 2012, 4:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Cubsin link=topic=80.msg85448#msg85448
       date=1343334903]
       He doesn't deserve to be a Chicago Cub.
       [/quote]
       Well, I would have to agree there.
       The guy deserves to be on a winner, and I suspect that he will
       be, and that will not be the Cubs.
       #Post#: 85463--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ryan Dempster
       By: papa smurf Date: July 26, 2012, 5:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I went with # 2 there is no way the cubs make a deal with alt
       and not think he would go there.
       #Post#: 85471--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ryan Dempster
       By: Jes Beard Date: July 26, 2012, 5:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=papa smurf link=topic=80.msg85463#msg85463
       date=1343340369]
       I went with # 2 there is no way the cubs make a deal with alt
       and not think he would go there.
       [/quote]
       Why not?
       #Post#: 85498--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ryan Dempster
       By: Cactus Date: July 26, 2012, 6:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Nation's take on what Dave Kaplan had to say:
       [quote]
       The gist is, the Cubs thought they had an understanding with
       Dempster that they could negotiating with either the Braves or
       Dodgers, and then they got a better offer from the Braves. When
       Dempster through up a roadblock (albeit possibly temporary),
       asking the Cubs to try once more with the Dodgers, the Braves
       pulled their offer so they could explore other options. And
       that’s where we stand, as the Cubs try to get an acceptable deal
       from the Dodgers. The Cubs, Kap says, are trying to net a
       “handful” of pitching prospects, which suggests they will
       generally be of a lesser tier than Delgado.
       [/quote]
       If this is accurate, what Dempster did was not objectionable.
       Had the Braves MLB.com writer not made the yet to be completed
       deal public, there would be no criticism of Demp's actions.
       #Post#: 85505--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ryan Dempster
       By: DelMarFan Date: July 26, 2012, 7:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]Had the Braves MLB.com writer not made the yet to be
       completed deal public, there would be no criticism of Demp's
       actions.[/quote]
       Absolutely.  But the writer wouldn't have even known about it
       without someone in the Braves FO leaking the info.  I'm still
       curious about that and wondering whether it was deliberate.
       Probably they just thought the deal was done, though.
       #Post#: 85512--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ryan Dempster
       By: Ron Date: July 26, 2012, 7:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Meanwhile, just to demonstrate how totally reliable internet
       rumors are, after (I believe more than) one report that the
       Dodgers had offered Webster straight up for Dempster, with the
       Cubs balking, Jon Heyman now claims just the opposite - that the
       Cubs made that offer, with the Dodgers refusing.
       Who's on first?
       Heyman also says he's told Dempster told Braves player he'd
       accept trade, but changed his mind.  As always, all of these
       reports should be consumed with a very healthy dose of sea salt.
       Hoping Kaplan's rumors trump the national guys.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page