URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Bleacher Bums Forum
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 508673--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Today’s Game - 2025
       By: guest424 Date: March 9, 2025, 8:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Tater?
       #Post#: 508675--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Today’s Game - 2025
       By: guest424 Date: March 9, 2025, 8:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       With some of the dogshit we've kept around recently I'm sure we
       can tolerate Workman for a while.
       #Post#: 508680--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Today’s Game - 2025
       By: craig Date: March 9, 2025, 8:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=JeffH link=topic=653.msg508670#msg508670
       date=1741563885]
       I've seen a lot of Cubs Rule 5 picks over the years.  None can
       compare to Tater.  The risk-reward equation is absolutely in his
       favor.  Keep him.  The cost?  Vidal F. Bruján.  C'mon,
       Bro.[/quote]
       The great Rule 5's in my memory:
       Modern era:  Hector Rondon.
       -2013 rookie.  4.77 ERA as rookie, 45 games, 54 innings, so well
       used.  1.4 WHIP.  Not good, but on that 66-win team not awful.
       -2014, 1.05 WHIP, 2.42 ERA, 64 games, heavy-usage and really
       good.
       -2015, 1.00 WHIP, 1.67 ERA, 72 games, 30 saves.  He was really,
       really good that fun season.
       -2016, finally had injuries, 3.53 ERA.
       Ancient days:
       1.  Jody Davis, 1981 Rookie.  Strike year, 56 games even with
       strike.  .694 OPS as rookie, ensuing 6 years all north of .700
       OPS, two all-star years, a gold glove, and twice with MVP votes
       (10th and 21st).
       2.  Guillermo "Willie" Hernandez, 1977 rookie.  Had 3.03 ERA
       with 110 innings as a 22-year-old Cubs rookie.  Was
       unfortunately traded for Dick Ruthven.  Went on to
       back-to-back-to-back all-star seasons with Detroit, including
       the amazing season as both MVP and Cy Young in 1984.
       -Can you imagine a 21st-century reliever pitching 80 games,
       140.1 innings, and a 1.92 ERA?
       #Post#: 508692--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Today’s Game - 2025
       By: Reb Date: March 10, 2025, 1:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=davep link=topic=653.msg508630#msg508630
       date=1741548958]
       Exactly.  If the Cubs had the ability to option Workman to the
       minors, there would be little discussion, since THIS season
       would be the only one that had to be taken into consideration.
       However, the Cubs do NOT have the ability to option Workman to
       the minors, so future seasons become much more important factors
       to be considered.
       [/quote]
       So, Cubs would not be keeping Workman in order to have lefty
       power off the bench. If he makes the club, the reason is future
       upside.
       But that only goes so far. With just three true bench spots,
       Workman needs to produce in that role. If he makes the club and
       then doesn’t produce, he’ll be gone.
       As Jeff notes, losing Brujan to keep Workman for opening day
       would hardly qualify as a terrible sacrifice. And it helps that
       Brujan can’t decline an outright in the event Brujan clears
       waivers. If Brujan clears and then Workman sucks thereafter, can
       move up Brujan.
       #Post#: 508704--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Today’s Game - 2025
       By: craig Date: March 10, 2025, 8:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Reb link=topic=653.msg508692#msg508692
       date=1741589335]
       So, Cubs would not be keeping Workman in order to have lefty
       power off the bench. If he makes the club, the reason is future
       upside.
       But that only goes so far. With just three true bench spots,
       Workman needs to produce in that role. If he makes the club and
       then doesn’t produce, he’ll be gone.
       As Jeff notes, losing Brujan to keep Workman for opening day
       would hardly qualify as a terrible sacrifice. And it helps that
       Brujan can’t decline an outright in the event Brujan clears
       waivers. If Brujan clears and then Workman sucks thereafter, can
       move up Brujan.
       [/quote]
       1.  Heh heh, both lefty power and future upside might both be
       values/reasons Hoyer might have?  Lefty power off the bench now,
       and left power off the bench future?
       2.  "Doesn't produce" will be in context of alternatives.  How
       much production does a GM reasonably expect from 26th man?  Last
       year Cubs had Wisdom, Madrigal, Mastrobuoni, Mervis, Vasquez
       with OPS .629, .535, .470, .302, .226.  Not sure, but may be
       that anything north of .550 might be considered OK?
       3.  Obviously interest in 26th man depends on
       health/effectiveness of 12 guys ahead.  Will both Dansby and
       Hoerner be healthy, Hoerner with enough arm to throw from SS?
       26th-man's SS defense isn't crucial.  Is PCA healthy?  26th
       man's CF defense isn't crucial.  But if Hoerner's arm isn't
       SS-ready, or PCA pulls hamstring, the relevance of SS/CF defense
       can change.
       4.  Totally, a roster decision for April can totally change as
       real-season performance plays. Excellent chance that Workman
       will have Mervis-esque season and they'll move him soon enough,
       no problem.  Call up Brujan or Lopez then.  Or Cowles.  Or
       Triantos.  Or Caissie.  Or go acquire from outside somebody's
       Brujan or Lopez or Mastrobuoni, always lots of those guys in AAA
       or back-of-big-league-roster that won't cost anything.  Even if
       Lopez goes away and Brujan improbably gets claimed, guys of that
       profile aren't hard to find.
       Obviously best case is that the Cubs main guys are all healthy
       and good.  The Cubs are scoring runs regularly and winning a
       lot.  Nobody is hurt, so they don't actually NEED Workman to
       play.  But he does get some selective opportunities, and looks
       good and productive when he does.  Why not?
       If not, who cares, nothing lost.
       #Post#: 508705--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Today’s Game - 2025
       By: craig Date: March 10, 2025, 8:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Two other notes on Workman.
       1.  He was much better 2nd half than 1st.  Had .947 OPS 2nd
       half.
       2.  He was much worse against lefties.  .592-OPS.  Was
       .889-on-season versus righties.
       Obviously if he does survive, usage against LHP will be avoided.
       And if "improvement is non-linear," maybe he really did improve
       in some real way, made some adjustments that will carry forward,
       and he will be functional when used selectively?
       If not, who cares, nothing lost.
       #Post#: 508798--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Today’s Game - 2025
       By: JeffH Date: March 10, 2025, 6:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A couple more hits for Tater today.
       #Post#: 508799--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Today’s Game - 2025
       By: guest424 Date: March 10, 2025, 6:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Lol
       #Post#: 508840--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Today’s Game - 2025
       By: craig Date: March 10, 2025, 9:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Wicks 4 shutout innings.  2K/0BB.  Every outing is different,
       and game wasn't televised.  But I check the game-track thing for
       a couple of his batters, and it seemed like he was mostly
       working low in the zone.  May not be anything real.  But in
       earlier interview, he talked about not shooting for K's as much,
       and being interested in pitching to contact more, given the
       defense he'll have behind him.  I wonder if that's real, and if
       part of that isn't kinda giving up on the high fastball?  Maybe
       he really is just going to try to pound with lower-half pitches?
       K's are always good, so I'm not sure trying to live with few
       K's is going to work for him.  But, given his soft fastball, I'm
       not sure he's got the location or the consistency to do the
       high-fastball game very well?  Seemed like last year, that his
       precision with the up fastball wasn't consistent, which
       contributed to walks.  And with imperfect location, some of the
       misses in the zone were gopher balls.  *IF* compromising K's
       both reduces walks and reduces HR's, that might be an
       advantageous compromise.
       #Post#: 509140--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Today’s Game - 2025
       By: Deeg Date: March 15, 2025, 12:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       20 year-old Keito Mombetsu carved up the Cubs for 5 perfect
       innings at Tokyo Dome today. Soft-tossing southpaw (max 91.2 FB)
       but changes speeds well and great command. Hanshin considers him
       a great prospect.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page