DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Bleacher Bums Forum
HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Archives
*****************************************************
#Post#: 51012--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: navigator Date: January 9, 2012, 2:31 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
yeah, they have a pretty good OL, RB's and a QB they can win
some games with.
They also have 2 pretty good TE's in Olsen and Shockey.
With another WR and some help on D, they'll get better.
#Post#: 51042--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: chifaninva Date: January 9, 2012, 4:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Could always switch to watching the weather channel or something
LOL!!
#Post#: 51043--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: chifaninva Date: January 9, 2012, 4:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Sh!t, I'm a fukking Bears fan, have been my whole life, and I'll
die a Bears fan..
#Post#: 51045--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: yapper Date: January 9, 2012, 4:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Maybe it's just me, but from what I saw of the caliber of play
in the wildcard games, I find the Bears' prospects quite
discouraging. We are well behind the curve in both talent and
coaching, and it seems like we're falling farther behind the
elite NFC teams every year. At full strength, the Bears MIGHT
have been able to make a better showing against the Giants than
the Falcons did, but every other team in the NFC playoff field
appears to be noticeably superior to us. More playmakers
(especially on offense, where it really matters these days),
more focus, fewer mistakes, better coaching, etc.
If the Bears don't significantly improve themselves this
offseason... especially at WR, OL and coaching... I'm afraid
it could be years before we're in the playoff conversation
again.
#Post#: 51047--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: Sportster Date: January 9, 2012, 4:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Cupboards empty thanks to Angieblow.....
#Post#: 51048--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: yapper Date: January 9, 2012, 4:45 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
From a personnel perspective, I really think that this year's
draft and FA activity will determine whether we get back to the
playoffs next year, or go into a 3-5 year playoff drought where
we'll be struggling to make it to .500 in any given year.
Without some new blood and a more much more competitive scheme
on defense, we are gonna need an offense that can score 30 or 35
points on demand just to stay in games. And since we are miles
away from that kind of offense in either scheme or talent,
well...
Suffice to say that a toady hack like Tim Ruskell is not the
guy you want calling the shots in an offseason that's this
critical. Lovie, Tice and the rest had best be praying he
doesn't get the gig cause they're all dead men walking if he's
buying the groceries.
#Post#: 51050--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: 46 Date: January 9, 2012, 4:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
+1
#Post#: 51065--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: navigator Date: January 9, 2012, 6:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I read this in the Dr office this afternoon. I think the Bears
WR could use this.
HTML http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1193455/index.htm
#Post#: 51081--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: Sportster Date: January 9, 2012, 7:40 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
We don't need much to make us competitive while we've still got
some older talent. But the window is very much closing fast.
THIS year...we need a top wideout drafted and one via FA, same
with OL and draft a good corner or get one via FA. Now IF we get
JUST this, we will be in it next season. We've got the tools at
QB, for the most part on DL if they're not on the field all
game, secondary is so so but heck even the top teams are getting
burned bad on defense, so we need a productive offense. We've
got a great running game with plenty of depth...unless they get
stupid and drain us there,too. We get that help, even just some
of that help, we can be back in it.
#Post#: 51121--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: BearHit Date: January 10, 2012, 6:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
How many Super Bowls would Troy have without being able to call
audibles?
HTML http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-aikman-skeptical-of-shift-from-martz-to-tice-20120109,0,3845201.story
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page