DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Bleacher Bums Forum
HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Archives
*****************************************************
#Post#: 50822--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: Pekin Date: January 7, 2012, 8:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
That's depressing...
#Post#: 50824--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: boogie Date: January 7, 2012, 8:45 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Somebody has to be interested. Really. Even accepting Lovie.
Look, Angelo accepted Jauron. Right????
#Post#: 50825--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: boogie Date: January 7, 2012, 8:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
If Ruskell gets the job, I am going to start following another
team. Really. That is just depressing.
#Post#: 50827--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: navigator Date: January 7, 2012, 9:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
for some reason I find my self pulling for the Lions over the
Saints :-)
#Post#: 50829--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: boogie Date: January 7, 2012, 9:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=navigator link=topic=65.msg50827#msg50827
date=1325991608]
for some reason I find my self pulling for the Lions over the
Saints :-)
[/quote][quote author=navigator link=topic=65.msg50827#msg50827
date=1325991608]
for some reason I find my self pulling for the Lions over the
Saints :-)
[/quote]
I am pulling for either team so it is win/win. The Lions our
division, plus I feel sorry for them for being so bad for so
long. The Saints, Drew Brees et al, they just do a great job.
Plus I love visiting NOLA. I love watching a game where you can
root for both teams. LOL
#Post#: 50840--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: guest77 Date: January 7, 2012, 11:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
that picture of george mccaskey is freaky. he's got crazy eyes.
#Post#: 50857--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: Keysbear Date: January 8, 2012, 11:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Can George seriously be considering throwing out all the
goodwill he's created with the fans by hiring Ruskell? I have
hopes that he's a bit smarter than that.
#Post#: 50895--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: WshflThinking Date: January 8, 2012, 6:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Well just suppose for a minute Phillips fails to interview
candidates or we get turned down by several and Ruskell is given
the GM title, does that give George the reason to fire Phillips
and Ruskell? Just asking. When ownership gives Phillips a job to
do and he fails in his task, is that grounds for firing?
#Post#: 50900--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: WshflThinking Date: January 8, 2012, 6:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I found this blurb of interest:
It is believed Phillips wants to focus on external candidates
before giving Ruskell consideration.
#Post#: 50907--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
By: Pekin Date: January 8, 2012, 7:20 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
As well he should.
Phillips is the man to the McCaskeys because he got the stadium
deal done. And just in time also because no way it happens with
the economy today.
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page