URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Bleacher Bums Forum
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 483037--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove
       By: CUBluejays Date: November 27, 2023, 2:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=davep link=topic=630.msg483030#msg483030
       date=1701110918]
       I agree.  But in the context of the discussion, how much extra
       profit would the hotel make if they were to sign Ohtani.  And
       why should the Ricketts family put that money into the Cubs,
       which is a different entirely?  I have seen no indication that
       other owners devote their entire fortune to the team they own.
       And the few that do, soon back away from it, as the Mets
       ownership did after only three or four months.
       [/quote]
       Here's the thing.  No one is suggesting the Rickett's family
       throw their entire fortune into the Cubs payroll.  I made an off
       hand comment that the Rickett's family could lose money on the
       Cubs and still make that up with the other buisiness's they own
       around Wrigley.  I really believe that, but for the Cubs family
       to actually lose money on the Cubs and not just paper losses.
       The Cubs would need a payroll well above $300 million.  That
       would be without other revenues coming in playoffs or other say
       from Japanese TV rights.
       The Braves with a higher payroll and lower revenue than what the
       Cubs had in 2022, had a $70 million profit.
       #Post#: 483038--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove
       By: davep Date: November 27, 2023, 3:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=chgojhawk link=topic=630.msg483035#msg483035
       date=1701113604]
       The Ricketts family owns a ton of different ventures and earned
       their fortune well before buying the Cubs (obviously). The
       intent of the family was to use some of their fortune in running
       the Cubs. After suffering losses (on and off the field) some in
       the family weren’t too keen on continued investments toward the
       Cubs.
       The family worked out a plan where a capital investment company
       was created with investors, independent of the family, for the
       purpose of Cubs related business. My belief is that businesses
       included in this investment portfolio are pooled together for
       the greater good of all investments.
       Here is a relatively early release from the group:
       Hickory Street Capital (HSC), a real estate development company
       owned by the Ricketts family, is building a lifestyle mixed-use
       development adjacent to Wrigley Field. The development will
       consist of two main buildings and a community-oriented open air
       plaza.  The first building will be anchored by the new home of
       the Chicago Cubs front office and will also include various
       mixed-use retail tenants and an American Airlines conference
       center.  The second building will be anchored by Hotel Zachary
       and will include various mixed-use retail locations and a below
       grade parking structure.  The open air plaza will be a community
       gathering place featuring decorative landscaping, welcoming
       green space, playful water features and many park like elements
       that will help serve as the town center of Wrigleyville.
       [/quote]
       Thanks.  That is pretty much the way I remembered it.  The Cubs
       were meant to be a stand alone investment, and the peripheral
       investments were not to be comingled.
       #Post#: 483039--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove
       By: chgojhawk Date: November 27, 2023, 3:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=davep link=topic=630.msg483038#msg483038
       date=1701119328]
       Thanks.  That is pretty much the way I remembered it.  The Cubs
       were meant to be a stand alone investment, and the peripheral
       investments were not to be comingled.
       [/quote]
       I think it started that way but was modified as they went along.
       It was also supposed to 100% stay in the family but investors
       were brought along for the Wrigley neighborhood and the Cubs.
       #Post#: 483042--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove
       By: davep Date: November 27, 2023, 5:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It was reported that the original purchase contract specified
       that the Cubs could not borrow money for improvements to the
       stadium and grounds.  Because of this, when they decided to put
       in the giant outfield scoreboards, there was no money in
       operations to pay for it.  They then brought in "partners"
       (Wintrust was the specifid one mentioned) that shared the cost
       and ownership of the revenue coming from the ads on it.
       #Post#: 483045--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove
       By: CurtOne Date: November 27, 2023, 6:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=wmljohn link=topic=630.msg483032#msg483032
       date=1701112378]
       I heard from a friend that knows a kindergarten teacher who
       publishes a monthly newsletter that Ohtani would be signed by
       the Cubs before the week is out.
       [/quote]You need to get your facts straight, it was second
       grader who told the kindergarten teacher and she only publishes
       the newsletter bi-monthly.  Sheesh.
       #Post#: 483080--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove
       By: CUBluejays Date: November 27, 2023, 9:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=davep link=topic=630.msg483042#msg483042
       date=1701126420]
       It was reported that the original purchase contract specified
       that the Cubs could not borrow money for improvements to the
       stadium and grounds.  Because of this, when they decided to put
       in the giant outfield scoreboards, there was no money in
       operations to pay for it.  They then brought in "partners"
       (Wintrust was the specifid one mentioned) that shared the cost
       and ownership of the revenue coming from the ads on it.
       [/quote]
       Wintrust pays the Cubs to be their banking partner.  The money
       from the sponsorship helped pay for the Wrigley’s renovations.
       They don’t get a percentage of the add revenue.
  HTML https://www.mlb.com/news/chicago-cubs-and-wintrust-announce-long-term-legacy-partnership/c-103066466#:~:text=The%20Cubs%20entered%20into%20an,and%20Resorts%20and%20Under%20Armour.
       #Post#: 483109--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove
       By: CUBluejays Date: November 28, 2023, 9:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.bleachernation.com/cubs/2023/11/28/tyler-glasnow-shane-bieber/
       I would prefer the not Bieber option.
       #Post#: 483117--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove
       By: Reb Date: November 28, 2023, 3:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=CUBluejays link=topic=630.msg483109#msg483109
       date=1701185009]
  HTML https://www.bleachernation.com/cubs/2023/11/28/tyler-glasnow-shane-bieber/
       I would prefer the not Bieber option.
       [/quote]
       Yeah, the upside guy is Glasnow.
       But, Glasnow’s career high IP is 120 (and he’s 30) and he’s at
       $25M for 2024.
       Bieber is now a pitchability guy, maybe kind of like Stroman but
       with more of a pitch mix and fewer ground balls. He’s at MLBTR
       arb estimate of $ 12.2 for 2024.
       Both are pending post-2024 FAs.
       Kind of a scouting assessment re. Glasnow upside/health
       probability. If he’s projected for top form, he’s clearly
       preferable. On other hand, difference in salary could mean
       payroll money to sign Candelario or Robert Stephenson. So, maybe
       question is Bieber and  Candelario vs. Glasnow?
       In any case, Glasnow more of a potential TORP type guy, so he’s
       the pick. If not, happy if could get Bieber.
       #Post#: 483118--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove
       By: Deeg Date: November 28, 2023, 4:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=CUBluejays link=topic=630.msg483109#msg483109
       date=1701185009]
  HTML https://www.bleachernation.com/cubs/2023/11/28/tyler-glasnow-shane-bieber/
       I would prefer the not Bieber option.
       [/quote]
       All the peripherals are in free-fall with Beiber, and he’s lost
       3 MPH in velocity from when he was really good.  His topline
       numbers last year reflect a lot of luck.  If the Guardians are
       just looking to dump his contract, sure, but you certainly don’t
       want to give up anything of value for him.
       #Post#: 483123--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove
       By: CurtOne Date: November 28, 2023, 5:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I am amazed at the number of writers and "experts" are
       suggesting that the Cubs are the leading contenders for Ohtani.
       I'm a doubter, but where's the smoke...
       And let's not forget William's kindergarten teacher!
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page