URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 471836--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBFL 2023
       By: chgojhawk Date: April 19, 2023, 8:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Dojo Waiver #1. Drop Ginkel. Add Dylan Lee
       If anyone wants a SP for a closer shoot me a DM, text or email.
       #Post#: 471837--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBFL 2023
       By: CUBluejays Date: April 19, 2023, 8:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'll discuss Betts with Boris and Curt.
       #Post#: 471839--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBFL 2023
       By: CUBluejays Date: April 19, 2023, 10:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=ticohans link=topic=620.msg471833#msg471833
       date=1681900869]
       He's played at 2B 5 games per fantrax, which is our source of
       truth.
       We've always been able to petition for position eligibility,
       based on usage in real life. I'm not asking for any special
       treatment, nor am I making an outlandish request: it's been well
       known since the offseason that Betts was going to play a
       significant amount of time at 2B in 2023. That the change alters
       his value is true of any player that's ever added additional
       positional eligibility, which happens all the time. It makes no
       sense to single out or prejudice against Betts.
       And I'm not "tak[ing] it a step further". Even though it was
       well known that Betts was going to get time at 2B, I didn't ask
       for it until a clear pattern was established. If you were so
       concerned about how additional position eligibility would impact
       his value, you could have tried to trade for him. And I'm *not*
       asking for SS eligibility. If he starts a ton there, then yes,
       I'll ask for that, too, at the appropriate time, as I am now for
       2B.
       Your arguments ignore league rules, precedent, and logic; and
       seem more aimed at hurting an opposing team than anything else.
       [/quote]
       The current thinking of Curt and I is that he has been more of a
       OF and part-time player at 2B, so he would have to wait to gain
       eligibility at 16 games.  If he is announced that he is going to
       be moving to 2B or SS full time as their started going forward
       then that would be a different situation and something we would
       be more willing to grant.
       #Post#: 471840--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBFL 2023
       By: CUBluejays Date: April 19, 2023, 10:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Activating Joey Gallo and dropping Trevor Larnoch
       If anyone is interested in Drey Jameson or Alex Cobb I'd be
       willing to trade either for a MI or RP.
       #Post#: 471841--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBFL 2023
       By: CurtOne Date: April 19, 2023, 10:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Joe, mail.
       #Post#: 471842--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBFL 2023
       By: ticohans Date: April 19, 2023, 10:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=CUBluejays link=topic=620.msg471839#msg471839
       date=1681916821]
       The current thinking of Curt and I is that he has been more of a
       OF and part-time player at 2B, so he would have to wait to gain
       eligibility at 16 games.  If he is announced that he is going to
       be moving to 2B or SS full time as their started going forward
       then that would be a different situation and something we would
       be more willing to grant.
       [/quote]
       Sounds good
       #Post#: 471843--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBFL 2023
       By: Dave23 Date: April 19, 2023, 11:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That’s a slippery slope…just saying…
       #Post#: 471846--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBFL 2023
       By: method Date: April 19, 2023, 11:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=ticohans link=topic=620.msg471833#msg471833
       date=1681900869]
       He's played at 2B 5 games per fantrax, which is our source of
       truth.
       We've always been able to petition for position eligibility,
       based on usage in real life. I'm not asking for any special
       treatment, nor am I making an outlandish request: it's been well
       known since the offseason that Betts was going to play a
       significant amount of time at 2B in 2023. That the change alters
       his value is true of any player that's ever added additional
       positional eligibility, which happens all the time. It makes no
       sense to single out or prejudice against Betts.
       And I'm not "tak[ing] it a step further". Even though it was
       well known that Betts was going to get time at 2B, I didn't ask
       for it until a clear pattern was established. If you were so
       concerned about how additional position eligibility would impact
       his value, you could have tried to trade for him. And I'm *not*
       asking for SS eligibility. If he starts a ton there, then yes,
       I'll ask for that, too, at the appropriate time, as I am now for
       2B.
       Your arguments ignore league rules, precedent, and logic; and
       seem more aimed at hurting an opposing team than anything else.
       [/quote]
       It is 100% to block you from gaining an advantage. you are my
       competitor.   If they announce he's the starting 2bman or
       starting SS there is precedent, but if he's just roving all over
       the field, players should have to wait till the eligibility
       rules are met. otherwise why have them? why not just set the
       games needed to 5. By your logic any player that has a few
       starts at another position should be "petitioned" and
       immediately gain eligibility. His primary position is still OF.
       #Post#: 471848--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBFL 2023
       By: ticohans Date: April 19, 2023, 12:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Dave23 link=topic=620.msg471843#msg471843
       date=1681920512]
       That’s a slippery slope…just saying…
       [/quote]
       We literally have position eligibility requests like this every
       single year. Why is this a slippery slope now?
       #Post#: 471849--------------------------------------------------
       Re: BBFL 2023
       By: Dave23 Date: April 19, 2023, 12:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I wasn’t referring to you…I was referring to the response, which
       is different from literally every other response we have ever
       had in similar situations.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page