DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Bleacher Bums Forum
HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Archives
*****************************************************
#Post#: 462108--------------------------------------------------
Re: Cubs in ‘23
By: CUBluejays Date: October 20, 2022, 12:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=craig link=topic=612.msg462101#msg462101
date=1666232783]
So if I'm understanding, then stacking seasons above lux line
has no impact on draft picks, only on financial tax levels.
Yes?
-Hoyer could go $39 over lux every remaining CBA season, and the
only consequence would be financial, no draft factor?
-And the 10-back draft factor doesn't matter whether it's 1st,
2nd, or 3rd year over the lux line.
I don't think Hoyer is going to go $40 over the lux line this
winter, so non-factor.
Under old CBA, it seemed like even Yankees tried to avoid the
triple-lux, and would try to restart the lux count. Are the
penalties less now, and triple-luxing will be routine instead of
exceptional? I ask because if triple-lux is still a big deal,
Hoyer may prioritize staying under the line this year to defer
approach of triple-lux?
[/quote]
It had more to do with MLB’s revenue sharing. Teams that were
repeat offenders had to pay a tax on big market teams that would
have gotten revenue sharing but had to refund it (White Sox,
Blue Jays, A’s). It was around $100 million that was refunded.
The A’s are revenue sharing recipients again so that decreases
the amount a lot and I’m not sure it is even still in the CBA
about repea offenders getting taxed.
HTML https://www.mlb.com/glossary/transactions/competitive-balance-tax
Here is the penalties.
For $19 million over it is over $5 million dollar difference
between year 1 and 3.
For $39 million over it is over $10 million dollar difference
between year 1 and 3
Now the Steve Cohen tax has bite, but the difference for a
repeat offender is still small. If you were $80 million over the
last $20 million would cost and addition $16 million in year 1
and $22 million in year 3.
#Post#: 462136--------------------------------------------------
Re: Cubs in ‘23
By: ticohans Date: October 20, 2022, 4:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=craig link=topic=612.msg462102#msg462102
date=1666233900]
A difference is that we don't already have guys stepping towards
arbitration. Once Bryant and the young guys hit arbitration,
the inflation path was severe even without adding new talent.
Right now, it seems like other than Hoerner, there aren't any
imminent arbitration-inflation guys? Keegan and steele, soon
enough I guess, IF they remain good. But if cats like Mervis
and Canario and PCA and Wicks do become part of the next good
team, there remains a 3-year window before those kinds of guys
even start the arb spiral.
[/quote]
This is a big part of why I'm so adamant on spending
significantly this winter.
Further, not only are we going to have very little arb inflation
over the next few years, but as I've mentioned previously, we
continue to see big contracts cycle off the books the next two
years.
While frustrated with how Ricketts has controlled spending the
past few years, like others on the board, I'm willing to give
the ownership the benefit of the doubt this winter.
But I need to see ~$90M added to the current payroll to feel
like ownership is making good on its word.
#Post#: 462138--------------------------------------------------
Re: Cubs in ‘23
By: craig Date: October 20, 2022, 5:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
tico, I agree with your analysis. Your ~$90 would leave them
~$10 below lux; the $75-90 Jeff has suggested could leave $15-25
sub-lux. With Heyward and Hendricks $35 coming off, there could
still be solid spending space entering 2024 and beyond.
#Post#: 462140--------------------------------------------------
Re: Cubs in ‘23
By: Reb Date: October 20, 2022, 7:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Would be helpful if Hoyer could pull off a major trade to get
impact or significant guy instead of having to rely entirely on
FA market.
But, hard to see how Cubs match up from the major league roster.
Happ only a year away from free agency, which reduces his trade
value; doesn’t seem to make sense to trade Hoerner or Steele,
etc. Doesn’t seem like Morel or Velazquez would get you much in
return.
Would love to get, say, Pablo Lopez, but Marlins had a huge ask
for Lopez at trade deadline—insisting on Gleyber AND Oswaldo
Peraza from Yankees. So, hard to see anything like that.
Wouldn’t shock me if maybe Cubs put together a package of
prospects for the right guy, especially as that might help with
the 40-man roster crunch. Presumably, Hoyer will be open to a
variety of ways to get better in 2023.
#Post#: 462146--------------------------------------------------
Re: Cubs in ‘23
By: JeffH Date: October 21, 2022, 7:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Maybe an opportunity to trade for Kelenic with the Mariners?
He's been a disappointment in the majors so far, but he has the
pedigree. He's lost the CF job to Rodriguez.
#Post#: 462150--------------------------------------------------
Re: Cubs in ‘23
By: guest405 Date: October 21, 2022, 7:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The path to us being good again soon is an easy one and its
paved in green.
Dont trade away the prospects we've accumulated.
Just fill our holes via free agency.
We're the Cubs not the Royals.
People want to play here.
And BTW...
Bring back Rizzo.
#Post#: 462157--------------------------------------------------
Re: Cubs in ‘23
By: CurtOne Date: October 21, 2022, 12:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Dusty for Cardinals GM
#Post#: 462158--------------------------------------------------
Re: Cubs in ‘23
By: ticohans Date: October 21, 2022, 12:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=JeffH link=topic=612.msg462146#msg462146
date=1666354605]
Maybe an opportunity to trade for Kelenic with the Mariners?
He's been a disappointment in the majors so far, but he has the
pedigree. He's lost the CF job to Rodriguez.
[/quote]
I like the idea, and that Kelenic is a lefty, but can he
actually play the position? Would be hesitant to commit serious
prospect resources to the trade if he's just going to need to
move off the role.
#Post#: 462159--------------------------------------------------
Re: Cubs in ‘23
By: JR Date: October 21, 2022, 1:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Kelenic sounds like a younger Clint Frazier to me.
Seriously it is amazing how a guy like Kelenic can seem so
promising in the minors, come up to the majors and be a
completely overmatched whiff machine. By the way modern
baseball hitting philosophies and approaches stink.
#Post#: 462160--------------------------------------------------
Re: Cubs in ‘23
By: ticohans Date: October 21, 2022, 1:25 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://blogs.fangraphs.com/lets-admire-some-of-the-strongest-arms-in-baseball-infield-edition/
Fun article on best infield arms, including one of our own, and
one of our top FA acquisition targets...
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page