URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 463173--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in ‘23
   DIR By: guest405
       Date: November 11, 2022, 1:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I normally have no issue with Japanese position players other
       than the fact that their power doesnt live up to the hype.
       My issue is with the pitchers who come over here after they've
       been rode like a rented mule.
       #Post#: 463175--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in ‘23
   DIR By: Dave23
       Date: November 11, 2022, 3:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Esteban Quiroz and Jared Young were outrighted to Iowa today.
       New number is 34…
       #Post#: 463177--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in ‘23
   DIR By: davep
       Date: November 11, 2022, 3:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: DUSTY link ---
       >
       > I normally have no issue with Japanese position players other
       than the fact that their power doesnt live up to the hype.
       >
       > My issue is with the pitchers who come over here after they've
       been rode like a rented mule.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Corey is an antimuleite.
       #Post#: 463178--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in ‘23
   DIR By: Reb
       Date: November 11, 2022, 4:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Dave23 link ---
       >
       > Esteban Quiroz and Jared Young were outrighted to Iowa today.
       >
       > New number is 34…
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Cubs haven’t formally made a move with Heyward yet, so roster is
       at 35, according to AZ Phil.
       Vizcaino still on roster too.
       #Post#: 463179--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in ‘23
   DIR By: craig
       Date: November 11, 2022, 4:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Still lots of relatively easy moves to make.
       I'd hate to get too daring and expose some pitching prospect
       that blossoms, in order to protect McKinstry or Uelman or Rucker
       or whomever.
       I wonder too how eager some of those fringy guys are to have
       their feelings hurt and to look elsewhere.  For example, suppose
       a guy like McKinstry gets derostered, to make room for Devers or
       Jensen or Franklin or something like that.  Suppose you tell
       him, "Dude, we'd like to have you come back, we'll have a bundle
       of 60-man roster spots that will open, and we still think you've
       got a really fair chance to win a big-league spot in camp".
       Would a guy like that be ticked off that he got derostered, and
       say no way I'm signing a non-roster deal?  Or would he say,
       "yeah, I get that.  And I see the opportunity here.  Yes, I
       think this will be a good opportunity place for me, where do I
       sign?"
       #Post#: 463180--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in ‘23
   DIR By: JeffH
       Date: November 11, 2022, 4:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Craig, before that conversation takes place, there's the risk of
       a player being chosen on a waiver claim.
       #Post#: 463186--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in ‘23
   DIR By: craig
       Date: November 11, 2022, 5:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yeah, of course.
       If they deroster all nine of Rivas, McKinstry, Ortega, Uelman,
       Rucker, Roberts, Martinez, Marquez, Leiter, there's a decent
       chance that a couple of those guys might get claimed, at least
       for a few weeks.
       But I'm guessing a lot of those guys won't get claimed?
       Everybody else has their own pitch labs and their own prospects
       with some ceiling that they want to protect too, I think.  So
       *IF* you take the risk and expose McKinstry or Uelman or
       whomever, and *if* they can claimed, that's kinda the way it
       goes.  If you have to get by and need to replace a McKinstry,
       that's not the end of the world and isn't the most difficult
       task to accomplish.
       I guess I was just wondering whether a guy who goes unclaimed
       would be MORE likely to stick with an organization that
       de-rostered him, but where he knows they'll have a scad of
       60-man spots opening up in spring; or whether he'd be LESS
       likely to stay?
       Of the guys from yesterday, Breault is one I'd like to bring
       back on a non-roster deal.  We're not deep in lefties.
       #Post#: 463187--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in ‘23
   DIR By: Deeg
       Date: November 11, 2022, 6:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Wouldn’t risk losing a younger player with potential to roster
       McKinstry.  He’s been bad at every turn and even with his decent
       last month was bad for us.  Offensive peripherals are bad,
       topline numbers are bad.  If someone claims him you can live
       with that.
       #Post#: 463191--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in ‘23
   DIR By: JeffH
       Date: November 11, 2022, 6:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Deeg, it's less about McKinstry himself than it is that someone
       is going to be a backup infielder on the 26-man roster.  If you
       lose McKinstry, that's fine, but you're going to need that
       40-man roster spot for the backup infielder.
       Always remember that the 26-man roster has to be filled out with
       somebody and that a maximum of 14 players can be on optional
       assignment at any one time.
       #Post#: 463192--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in ‘23
   DIR By: Deeg
       Date: November 11, 2022, 8:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: JeffH link ---
       >
       > Deeg, it's less about McKinstry himself than it is that
       someone is going to be a backup infielder on the 26-man roster.
       If you lose McKinstry, that's fine, but you're going to need
       that 40-man roster spot for the backup infielder.
       >
       > Always remember that the 26-man roster has to be filled out
       with somebody and that a maximum of 14 players can be on
       optional assignment at any one time.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I get that Jeff, but I think we can do better.  Hoerner’s
       ability to play either middle IF position means a lot,
       especially if we add a true SS and keep Madrigal.  Morel can
       play all across the infield at least adequately, if not well.  I
       don’t think McKinstry is worthy of either a 40 and 26-man roster
       spot.  If no one grabs him (which I think is likely) you stash
       him at Iowa and re-add him later if he’s needed.
       *****************************************************
       Page 24 of 308
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page