DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Bleacher Bums Forum
HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Archives
*****************************************************
#Post#: 444734--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2022 Chicago Bears
By: WshflThinking Date: January 13, 2022, 6:20 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.chicagobears.com/news/quick-hits-bill-polian-great-resource-to-bears-justin-fields-new-coach-gm
#Post#: 444735--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2022 Chicago Bears
By: WshflThinking Date: January 13, 2022, 6:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://bearswire.usatoday.com/2022/01/11/chicago-bears-attractive-general-manager-head-coach-destination-justin-fields/?utm_source=bearswire&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=pos1headline&env=2ea40eed43933273faeccdc9b0fba543451bcacdda6eb0f39e86c517461b1e2c
#Post#: 444741--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2022 Chicago Bears
By: JACKIEJOKEMAN REDUX Date: January 13, 2022, 8:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Back when we drafted trubisky we were all against it except for
one poster who said thats who we would take.
Anyone remember who that poster was ?
#Post#: 444742--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2022 Chicago Bears
By: dallasbear2 Date: January 13, 2022, 9:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I never thought Glennon was the guy, even with the long term
deal, that the Bears were seriously going to go with at QB. I
looked at the QB rankings and Trubisky for the most part was the
highest rated QB of the 3. I had watched a bowl game he played
in and saw a QB with mobility and a strong arm. I figured
Trubisky was the pick.
There was some support here for Solomon Thomas and Jamaal Adams.
I don't recall many calling for Watson or Mahomes though I'm
sure they'll spout now that he was their guy.
#Post#: 444751--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2022 Chicago Bears
By: WshflThinking Date: January 14, 2022, 2:11 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=JACKIEJOKEMAN REDUX
link=topic=592.msg444741#msg444741 date=1642127389]
Back when we drafted trubisky we were all against it except for
one poster who said thats who we would take.
Anyone remember who that poster was ?
[/quote]
I didnt like Trubisky for several reasons. First of all he wasnt
a 4 year QB. They had a one year window to make a judgement. He
didnt go to a big name football university either. He had
failure
written all over him from the beginning.
#Post#: 444755--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2022 Chicago Bears
By: Grizzlybear34 Date: January 14, 2022, 5:13 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Bears4ever - Love and lived the rant. Optimism is what we have
in buckets.
#Post#: 444756--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2022 Chicago Bears
By: Grizzlybear34 Date: January 14, 2022, 5:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I was on board with Adams, but was okay with Watson. Watson's
pedigree at Clemson, in the biggest games was my draw. The
drawback was his knee injury history. Mahommes was compared to
Cutler at the time, and no one wanted a 2nd screening of that.
#Post#: 444758--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2022 Chicago Bears
By: BillSharp Date: January 14, 2022, 5:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I just assumed Watson would be picked. The trade up to take
Trubisky was absolutely insane.
#Post#: 444759--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2022 Chicago Bears
By: Bears4Ever Date: January 14, 2022, 6:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Ty Grizz- I view this board as my therapy, binky and sounding
board all combined in one as far as the Bears go. I think its
part of why I've been here for so long since the move from the
old boards.....
#Post#: 444761--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2022 Chicago Bears
By: boogie Date: January 14, 2022, 7:17 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Trubisky was my #1 qb choice. He had the mobility and the arm.
And Nagy totally didnt play to his strengths. Remember moving
on to level 202?
On the HC front, I am torn about wanting a Def based HC. If we
get one, the defense will be good, but he will have to hire a
good OC. If that OC is good, and if/when/hopefully he makes
Fields a success he is going to get poached by some other team
for HC. If we get an offense HC, at least he would remain, and
provide continuity for Fields.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page