URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 38018--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
   DIR By: Jes Beard
       Date: October 14, 2011, 11:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: craig link ---
       >
       > I agree with Dave, if you want to offer arb to Pena, you
       should probably expect that you'll have him back at $8 or $10,
       rather than expecting a draft pick.
       >
       > Of course, I don't know the man.  He seems bright and may be
       looking for a chance at some playoff baseball still before he
       retires.  Or he might be the type of guy who'd rather play
       somewhere for $4.5 than be a backup on the Cubs for $8.  So
       perhaps if we did acquire somebody else as the intended starter,
       Pena wouldn't accept a Cub arb deal, even if it would
       necessarily offer more millions for this year than he could get
       elsewhere.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       If the Cubs had any sense, they would not need to "acquire
       somebody else as the intended starter," but merely make clear to
       Pena that whether he is under contract with the Cub by virtue of
       arbitration, or leaves as a FA, or drops dead, or hits .500 in
       spring training, he is NOT going to be the starting firstbaseman
       for the Cubs in 2012, that the Cubs will go with LaHair or if he
       fails they will go with someone else who is a prospect and may
       be around to help for a while, and they will NOT be playing
       Pena.  Pena would then have to decide whether to become a FA
       now, after a fairly good season might increase his FA value, or
       wait to become a FA after getting 200 AB in 2012 and seeing what
       value he had then.
       I also don't quite understand how you would believe that he
       would likely only get $4.5 and a backup firstbaseman's role
       somewhere else, when you believe he would likely get $8-10M for
       one year in arbitration.
       #Post#: 38025--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
   DIR By: CurtOne
       Date: October 14, 2011, 12:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't like Pena.  I just don't see him as a plus.  HOWEVER,
       with his high walk rate and OPS, Theo might love him.  Friedman
       did.  So, we may be keeping him.  The price to be paid to have a
       guy like Theo, I guess.
       #Post#: 38040--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
   DIR By: davep
       Date: October 14, 2011, 1:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I suspect we will be saying that a lot in the near future.
       #Post#: 38043--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
   DIR By: ticohans
       Date: October 14, 2011, 1:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       with his obp, slg, and defense, pena is definitely a plus, and a
       guy i would not mind seeing accept arb, if it comes to that.
       #Post#: 38045--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
   DIR By: CUBluejays
       Date: October 14, 2011, 1:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think it was Tribune, but somebody had an article where Pena
       was looking for a multi-year deal and wasn't interested in a 1
       year deal.
       #Post#: 38061--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
   DIR By: JeffH
       Date: October 14, 2011, 3:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It will be fascinating to see what Epstein does in his first
       offseason with the club.
       I wonder if player moves might be made more toward "changing the
       culture" (i.e., improving effort) and less toward trying to "get
       good" right away.
       Ramirez, Zambrano, Soriano out.
       Pena, Byrd, Barney, Reed Johnson stay.
       Bring in a veteran mentor for Castro.
       #Post#: 38066--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
   DIR By: StrikeZone
       Date: October 14, 2011, 3:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: JeffH link ---
       >
       > Bring in a veteran mentor for Castro.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       What's Omar Vizquel's status?  Is he retiring yet?  If he's
       retiring and is interested in a coaching job, sign him and make
       him Starlin Castro's personal instructor / first base coach.
       I couldn't think of a better handler for him.
       #Post#: 38067--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
   DIR By: craig
       Date: October 14, 2011, 4:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Ron link ---
       >
       > Craig - Characterizing Pena simply as a .220 hitter is a tad
       disingenuous, don't you think?  ...
       > To suggest that Pena could only get $4.5 million for 2012,
       less than Marlon Byrd, seems to me to seriously undervalue the
       guy.
       --- End Quote ---
       Sorry Ron.  I sincerely and honestly wasn't trying to be
       disingenuous, or to be devaluing Pena.  He hits HR's, walks,
       plays defense, is a good chemist, and he hits .225.  It's all
       part of the total package.  Is that total package work $10/1,
       $25/3, $15/2, or $4.5/1, I don't know.  My guess is that teams
       aren't lining up to pay him $10 per season, or to offer
       multi-year deals approaching that.  I may be wrong.  My guess is
       that they won't be so motivated to sign a player of his profile
       that he'll be all targeted, wrapped and signed by some other
       team before the arbitration deadline even arrives.  Might be
       more likely that teams will wait for his price to settle out, or
       that teams who end up losing out on Fielder and Pujols get
       involved with Pena as a fallback, but again only after the arb
       deadline has already passed.
       If I'm right, and teams aren't lining up to pay him that kind of
       money before the arb deadline, then two things are true:
       1.  The Cubs need to evaluate whether he'll accept arbitration
       if they are to offer it.  Duh.  They might be thrilled to get
       him back at $8-10/1.  That's a value judgment, and Theo is
       qualified to make that.  As are tico and you, Ron.  I'm not
       qualified or confident that I know what would make best sense
       for us, or at what price.
       2.  If teams are not eager to pay him $10/season, it's not for
       lack of chemistry, HRs, walks, or defense.   It's because his
       overall production is constrained by his low BA.  Batting
       average is a component of all things offensive.  His OBP's these
       last two years have been .357 and .325.  His OPS's  have been
       .819 and .732.  Are those $10 million figures for a 1B?  Maybe,
       but I'm not certain.  Those values aren't higher because his BA
       is low.
       So making reference to his low batting average, which
       effectively constrains his productivity, is not disingenuous.
       It's just shorthand for the reality that we all understand, that
       his flaw limits his productivity to some degree, enough so that
       $8-10 isn't a sure and obvious thing (the way it would be with
       his walks and HR if he hit .280.)
       Pena is a unique player.  I admit I have a hard time
       guestimating what the mlb market for an .819-OPS 1b will be.
       What is the market for an .819-OPS 1B?  Is $10 a bargain?   Or
       an overpay?  I don't know.
       Two things that could work against him:
       1.  There are only 30 teams/starting 1B and Pena doesn't play
       elsewhere.  There aren't always a lot of openings for starting
       1B.  And even where there are openings some teams want a
       prospect, don't want to spend $8-10, or want a guy only if he's
       coming at bargain price.  How much market attention will he get?
       
       2.  He'll be 34 in the spring.  Teams may not project him as a
       long-term cornerstone.
       Sometimes older players sign at pretty modest prices.  Sometimes
       pretty good value-per-dollar contracts with guys like that
       because the market competition isn't hot.
       So if you offer arb to Pena, don't be overly certain that you're
       going to end up with a draft pick.  Offer arb only if you're OK
       with the possibility that he might accept it.
       #Post#: 38070--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
   DIR By: CurtOne
       Date: October 14, 2011, 4:34 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       His age, his OPS, his BA, his defense, and all that are a
       perfect storm for Theo.  It will be interesting to see what they
       do.  I'm guessing they will go hard after Pujols or Fielder and
       make the whole thing moot.  Pena can always be dealt if LaHair
       turns out to be something.
       #Post#: 38071--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
   DIR By: craig
       Date: October 14, 2011, 4:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: JeffH link ---
       >
       > It will be fascinating to see what Epstein does in his first
       offseason with the club.
       >
       > I wonder if player moves might be made more toward "changing
       the culture" (i.e., improving effort) and less toward trying to
       "get good" right away.
       >
       > Ramirez, Zambrano, Soriano out.
       >
       > Pena, Byrd, Barney, Reed Johnson stay.
       >
       > Bring in a veteran mentor for Castro.
       >
       >
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Excellent point, Jeff.  A new boss could want to set the tone
       for how things are going to be.  Trying to get an immediate
       start on defining the culture and values and procedures at the
       major as well as minor league level could be something he'd want
       to do.
       I'm from Wisconsin, so while I've always been a Cubs fan for
       baseball, I've always been a Green Bay Packers fan.  (Although
       until recently I never followed the football as closely as I did
       the baseball for a long time.)  Green Bay has really kind of
       established a way that they do things.  Totally a
       build-through-the-draft, draft-and-develop format.  They haven't
       signed a FA to a million-dollar contract in years,or traded for
       even a rotation player for many years.  (Brandon Chiller I think
       was their only million-dollar FA since Woodson and Pickett.)
       But the players as well as the coaches pretty much understand
       there is a way they go about things, and practice, and film
       study, and a lot of that kind of thing.  And they take a lot of
       pride in that.  There is definitely a "culture" to the
       organization, and kind of an acceptance of ways to be a
       professional NFL player that the team seems to buy into pretty
       thoroughly.   It would be interesting to see the Cubs not only
       end up with the recent success that the Packers have enjoyed,
       but also to kind of likewise end up with a positive identity of
       professionalism and effort and success.
       *****************************************************
       Page 15 of 1091
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page