URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 35607--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
       By: Jes Beard Date: September 29, 2011, 12:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=brjones link=topic=59.msg35597#msg35597
       date=1317312590]
       Make sure there is starting pitcher depth.  Coleman and Russell
       should not go into 2012 as the 6th and 7th starters.
       [/quote]
       True.  With an improved defense behind him, Coleman should go
       into 2012 as the 4th or 5th starter.
       [quote author=brjones link=topic=59.msg35597#msg35597
       date=1317312590]
       Dump Zambrano and Soriano, with the strategy being to take the
       deal that serves the most money.  No matter how much of these
       contracts the Cubs pay, they're not going to get anything better
       than some team's 20th-25th best prospect.
       [/quote]
       Not even close to accurate.
       While I am not saying the Cubs will do so, if they agreed to eat
       ALL of each of those contracts, they could likely get a very
       nice prospect in the bargain.  Zambrano still has the potential
       to return to what he was at the end of last season, when he was
       turning in true ace performances, and Soriano would likely be a
       perfectly acceptable DH for the next couple of years for some AL
       team.  Both could bring much more than a team's 20th-25th best
       prospect.  Now, I am not saying the Cubs either will or should
       eat that much contract, but they could.
       #Post#: 35610--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
       By: Cubsin Date: September 29, 2011, 12:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Byrd is a trading chip if the Cubs commit to B. Jackson. And
       aren't Mark Buerle and Edwin Jackson among the FA pitchers?
       #Post#: 35619--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
       By: Jes Beard Date: September 29, 2011, 12:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Byrd should be a trading chip even if the Cubs do not commit to
       Jackson.
       The Cubs can always replace Byrd with utter roster fill until
       talent develops, or replace him with Campana who would add
       considerable excitement, even if his hitting is weak enough he
       would actually be a performance liability.
       #Post#: 35627--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
       By: CurtOne Date: September 29, 2011, 1:34 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=brjones link=topic=59.msg35597#msg35597
       date=1317312590]
       [font=times new roman]
       Some things I would ideally like to see this offseason (in
       addition to adding the Friedman/Maddon or Epstein/Francona
       tandem):
       [/font][list][li][font=times new roman][font=Times New
       Roman]Target CJ Wilson, and make the best offer unless bidding
       gets ridiculous.  I'd definitely be willing to go as far as
       Jered Weaver's 5 year, $85 million
       deal.[/font][/font][/li][li][font=times new roman][font=Times
       New Roman]Attempt to add a young hitter who could become a
       building block player along with Castro and Garza (and hopefully
       Jackson).  I've mentioned Alonso (blocked by Votto) and Morrison
       (out of favor with the Marlins) several times, but there are
       probably others out there.  Dominic Brown and Brandon Belt come
       to mind immediately as top prospects whose teams just don't seem
       to want to play them, for example.  I'm sure there are
       others.[/font][/font][/li][li][font=times new roman][font=Times
       New Roman]Make Ramirez a "take it or leave it" offer pretty
       quickly around 2 years, $22-$26 million with a team option for
       2014.  If he doesn't accept, move on and find an under the radar
       trade (Chase Headley?  Martin
       Prado?).[/font][/font][/li][li][font=times new roman][font=Times
       New Roman]Avoid Fielder and Pujols because their contracts will
       be far too long.  Find a short term (1-3 years at most) middle
       of the lineup hitter (Beltran?  Ethier?  Wright?), which will
       allow the Cubs a little more time to determine where they need
       long term help.[/font][/font][/li][li][font=times new
       roman][font=Times New Roman]Find the best trade offer for Marmol
       and take it. He's far more Eric Gagne than Mariano
       Rivera.[/font][/font][/li][li][font=times new roman][font=Times
       New Roman]Dump Zambrano and Soriano, with the strategy being to
       take the deal that serves the most money.  No matter how much of
       these contracts the Cubs pay, they're not going to get anything
       better than some team's 20th-25th best prospect.  They're better
       off saving an extra $3 million or whatever.  Obviously, there
       are exceptions (specifically, I'm thinking about Zambrano having
       value to Ozzie Guillen, and eating more money might make him
       appealing as a second piece in a Morrison deal)...but generally,
       saving money should be the
       goal.[/font][/font][/li][li][font=times new roman][font=Times
       New Roman]Make sure there is starting pitcher depth.  Coleman
       and Russell should not go into 2012 as the 6th and 7th
       starters.[/font][/font][/li][li][font=times new
       roman][font=Times New Roman]Make it clear that CF is Brett
       Jackson's job to lose.[/font][/font][/li][/list][font=times new
       roman][font=Times New Roman]
       The Marlins are the most interesting team to watch in relation
       to the Cubs' offseason, I think.   Recent developments just seem
       to be great for the Cubs.  We all know of Morrison's issues and
       Zambrano's strong relationship with Ozzie.  But there are other
       factors too...they may not have a closer after the Nunez/Oviedo
       situation (making them a possible destination for Marmol).
       There have been rumors the last few days that they will shop the
       disappointing but reasonablly productive Ricky Nolasco (giving a
       potential contract match for Marmol who fills a Cubs need).
       They could potentially be a one stop shop to address several
       things the Cubs need to do this offseason.[/font][/font]
       [/quote]
       I agree with a lot of this.  I do think you go after one prime
       FA a year; you don't try to repair all the damage in one year.
       I would have Prince, Pujols, CJ Wilson and not much else on my
       list and give it my best shot.
       The problem with trading for a lot of those players who could
       potentially help us, the problem is...who do you trade?  The
       chips are few.  Byrd, Wells?  Beyond that, you have Marshall and
       Soto, people you'd prefer to keep, I would think.  Either the
       player or the Cubs have pretty much made Marmol, Colvin,
       Zambrano untradeable.   That makes it kind of hopeless.
       #Post#: 35629--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
       By: Cactus Date: September 29, 2011, 1:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=CurtOne link=topic=59.msg35627#msg35627
       date=1317321262]
       I agree with a lot of this.  I do think you go after one prime
       FA a year; you don't try to repair all the damage in one year.
       [/quote]
       Jim Hendry did that when he signed who was arguably the best
       free agent three years in a row.
       2007 Alfonso Soriano
       2008 Kosuke Fukudome
       2009 Milton Bradley
       Pitching, Pitching, and more pitching.
       #Post#: 35635--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
       By: Jes Beard Date: September 29, 2011, 2:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Building, building, and more building.
       Forget about FA moves until the internal development of talent
       reaches the point that a move can reasonably be expected to put
       the team over the top.
       We are miles away from that at the moment.
       #Post#: 35636--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
       By: brjones Date: September 29, 2011, 2:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As frustrating as Marmol is, I think he still has value in the
       right trade.  He's not going to get two legitimate starting
       pitching prospects anymore like Mike Adams did at midseason
       (after the Cubs told the Rangers they didn't have interest in
       trading Marmol...ugh).  But his name still has value, and it's
       not out of the question that he could be part of a deal for a
       pretty good player with a similar not-great contract.  That's
       why I brought up the Marlins...if Nunez/Oviedo can't come back,
       then something like Marmol, Zambrano+money, and a couple of
       prospects/younger players (Colvin and a prospect?) might
       interest them for Nolasco and Morrison (if they really are
       interested in moving Nolasco).
       I think there are also situations to exploit this offseason in
       trades, and I hope the Cubs take advantage of them.  With the
       Dodgers' and Mets' money problems, it's very possible Ethier or
       Wright could become available for less than their full value.
       With the epic Braves and Red Sox collapses, who knows what they
       might be able to be convinced to do?  I mentioned it the other
       day and I think it's even more likely now...the Braves are going
       to want to add a bat, LF is the obvious place to do it, and
       Prado (in his second year of arbitration) might be expendable
       for not that much in return.  He's far from perfect at third
       base, but far better than any non-Ramirez free agents.
       I really wish we had a better idea of what Castillo and
       Clevenger could do at the major league level.  It seems like
       they could end up as John Buck and Koyie Hill, which would mean
       the Cubs would have one decent backup and one AAAA player.  Or,
       they could turn out to be Ramon Hernandez and Gregg Zaun, which
       would make Soto very expendable.  It's unfortunate the Cubs have
       been so stuck on Koyie Hill the last two years.
       #Post#: 35639--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
       By: Clarkaddison Date: September 29, 2011, 2:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Apparently the pitchers love throwing to Hill.  He was
       Dempster's personal catcher much of the year.  However, with
       Castillo and Clevenger ready to move up, he will probably end up
       as a farm system instructor.
       #Post#: 35666--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
       By: AZSteve Date: September 29, 2011, 6:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I for one am over <i> THE</i> Hill....
       #Post#: 35712--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '12
       By: buff Date: September 30, 2011, 7:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Terry Francona out in Boston.  Can't believe he is getting the
       shaft.  Really hope he waits for the cubs to come calling.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page