URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 35053--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Next GM for the Cubs
   DIR By: ben
       Date: September 26, 2011, 12:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Makes sense, Reb...it sure will be interesting to see what moves
       get made in the shorter term and in the longer term!
       #Post#: 35055--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Next GM for the Cubs
   DIR By: Jes Beard
       Date: September 26, 2011, 12:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: ben link ---
       >
       > Jes, better results can result from better execution of the
       approach (rather than thinking differently).
       >
       > And better execution can result from thinking differently (and
       better) about the approach.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes, better thinking and execution (and luck) can, and often
       does, bring a better result.
       Our real difference is that you have pointed to Boston as an
       example of the kind of "better thinking" needed.  I have not
       really disagreed about that, because I have (and remain)
       sincerely interested in knowing what "better thinking" you
       believe Boston might illustrate.  The only example you have
       given is sabermetrics, despite my repeated requests, and
       sabermetrics to me is no longer really different.  Anyone
       Rickets will consider is going to embrace sabermetrics.  I
       suspect that nearly all GM's in the near future around MLB will.
       #Post#: 35056--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Next GM for the Cubs
   DIR By: Jes Beard
       Date: September 26, 2011, 12:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Cubsin link ---
       >
       > Two points not yet mentioned. Looking at the long history of
       baseball, it occurs to me there's a chance that Barney might
       actually improve on his rookie year stats at some point in the
       future.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       That's a crazy idea....
       A rookie might get better?
       #Post#: 35057--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Next GM for the Cubs
   DIR By: StrikeZone
       Date: September 26, 2011, 1:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Clarkaddison link ---
       >
       > I think the problem is that everybody looks at Barney as
       Theriot lite.  The difference is Theriot was a second baseman
       playing shortstop.  Barney is a shortstop playing second base.
       Better speed, better range, more athleticism.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Darwin Barney is not faster than Ryan Theriot.
       In 2007, Theriot had 28 steals in 32 attempts.
       Barney's best stolen base total in the minors was 11.
       Barney is certainly a better defender than Theriot and probably
       a better base runner (base stealing and base running are two
       different things) but he most definitely isn't faster.
       #Post#: 35060--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Next GM for the Cubs
   DIR By: brjones
       Date: September 26, 2011, 1:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I guess one place I differ with a lot of Barney supporters is
       that I don't think he's a high .600s OPS guy.  I think his April
       was a complete and total fluke brought on by the fact that he
       was a fringe prospect who no one expected to have a significant
       role in the major leagues.  No one had bothered scouting him
       much, so he was able to surprise pitchers for a while...he was
       the Cubs' version of Sam Fuld.  Once the league got a real look
       at him, though, it took them no time to figure out how to
       dominate him.
       In my mind, we can expect more of the Barney we saw after May 1
       in the future.  That's a low-.600s OPS guy who just doesn't
       provide enough to play regularly.
       I guess it doesn't matter too much if the Cubs try to
       aggressively replace him this offseason...I suspect we'll see a
       Colvin-like collapse next April and he'll be out of the regular
       lineup by June 1 at the latest.  It may even do LeMahieu or
       Flaherty good to spend a couple extra months in the minors/on
       the major league bench.  But it would be nice if the Cubs could
       be proactive with him and see if there is any other team that
       buys Barney as an everyday player this offseason.  Who knows,
       maybe he could be the second player in a deal for a mid-rotation
       starter or something.
       #Post#: 35063--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Next GM for the Cubs
   DIR By: ben
       Date: September 26, 2011, 1:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       While neither sabermetrics nor allowing young, Ivy-League guys
       to have significant input into front-office decisions may be
       news today, 9 years ago it took VERY different thinking for Red
       Sox to hire 28-year old Epstein to LEAD the decision making
       process based on sabermetric principles (particularly after a
       90+ win season).
       In scouting/traditional baseball circles, that move was heresy!
       One can imagine what Cub "leadership" was then saying behind
       closed doors about the Red Sox new direction.
       Don't have time for research, but my recollection is that
       Epstein brought in some guys (including Big Popi) following
       sabermetric principles and his 28-year old instincts.
       #Post#: 35090--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Next GM for the Cubs
   DIR By: Deeg
       Date: September 26, 2011, 2:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You guys who are saying "no internal upgrade" are that sure that
       Flaherty or LeMaheiu couldn't provide one?  Wouldn't you like to
       at least find out?
       #Post#: 35098--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Next GM for the Cubs
   DIR By: Reb
       Date: September 26, 2011, 3:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ron mentioned this about 2B and Barney---defense.  This is a
       factor, especially when talking about LeMahieu and Flaherty in
       comparison.
       Seems to me that 3B is LeMahieu's natural defensive position,
       not 2B.  A tall guy who doesn't seem that quick or with great
       footwork for 2B.  I would not be against giving him a shot at 2B
       but I'm skeptical.
       I've never seen Flaherty at 2B but, as I've said before, hard
       for me to believe that a guy that big can play 2B regularly in
       the major leagues.
       I don't see DeWitt as a 2B regular either.  He is, at best, a
       passable defensive 2B and, incidentally, DeWitt has looked
       terrible at 3B in Aramis' absence last week.  Quade has been
       replacing him defensively late innings with LeMahieu.
       Not sure who would replace Barney.  Also, Barney as the 2B
       regular means that Cubs don't have to carry a utility SS on the
       25-man roster, which opens up a spot for somebody else.  Still,
       I'd like to see what's out there via trade with Barney coming
       off a decent rookie season.
       #Post#: 35112--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Next GM for the Cubs
   DIR By: Cubsin
       Date: September 26, 2011, 4:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If we could trade Barney to a team that values him as a SS and
       get back a better prospect, I'd be fine with that. But then, as
       Reb pointed out, we'd need to find and carry a utility infielder
       who could play SS (and I don't mean Flaherty or LeMahieu).
       The new GM is going to be very busy learning about his new
       organization and making important decisions about Soriano,
       Zambrano, ARam's option and the fate of Quade and his coaches.
       It may be a while before upgrading 2B moves to the top of his
       priority list.
       #Post#: 35120--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Next GM for the Cubs
   DIR By: CurtOne
       Date: September 26, 2011, 4:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ron, some of this is groupthink, especially when you can come up
       with a blogger, "expert," or columnist who agrees.  Several
       boards I've seen Barney dismissed as the least of the Cubs'
       problems and posters scoffed at who press it.  Maybe it has to
       do with what the Cubs can control; Barney is an easy target over
       the real disasters dooming the Cubs to many more years of
       frustration.
       *****************************************************
       Page 27 of 159
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page