URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 388852--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '20
       By: brjones Date: September 30, 2019, 9:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I've seen these BetOnline.ag manager odds on a few different
       Twitter accounts today. Espada is the Astros bench coach, is he
       the playoff coach candidate Theo referred to today?
       David Ross +200
       Joe Espada +300
       Mark DeRosa +400
       Mark Loretta +600
       Hensley Meulens +600
       Joe Girardi +750
       Carlos Beltran +750
       Kevin Youkilis +1000
       #Post#: 388853--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '20
       By: Ron Date: September 30, 2019, 9:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=CUBluejays link=topic=546.msg388845#msg388845
       date=1569894600]
       Theo’s press conference is really a rorscharch test of your Cubs
       fandom.
       Cubs non-pitchers had a 74.2% contact percentage. The 15 team
       was 76.5%. The number 5 team was 77.7%. The Astros were top at
       team at 80.8%.
       Bryant (74.1%) Schwarber (73.9%) and Happ (71.7)ranked 9, 10, 13
       on the Cubs this year. Castellanos was 16 at 70.4%. Contreras
       18th at 69.7%  Baez ranked 20th at 66.7%.   I set it to a
       minimum of 50 PA.
       [/quote]
       I'm confused. You seem to be saying that there were 8 Cubs who
       had better contact rates than Bryant, that 15 had better rate
       than Castellanos, 17 had higher rate than Contreras and 19
       higher than Baez. Who were they?  Of course, 50 PA is very low
       standard for comparison.
       #Post#: 388855--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '20
       By: CUBluejays Date: September 30, 2019, 9:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Zobrist, Rizzo, Hoerner, Kemp, Lucroy, Heyward, Caratini,
       Almora, Bryant, Schwarber, Descalso, Happ, Russell, LESTER,
       Castellanos, Bote, Contreras, DARVISH, Baez, HENDRICKS.
       This is the Cubs top 20 hitters by contact rate. My phone didn’t
       reset it to 50 PA my first post and guys like Zagunis and Taylor
       Davis where in there.
       I’m not sure why Baez gets a pass when it comes to contact
       rates. I love him, but he is the streakiest player on the team.
       #Post#: 388856--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '20
       By: craig Date: September 30, 2019, 9:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ron, basically it's Schwarber, Bryant, Baez, or Contreras as the
       four core guys who might be hypothetically considered for trade
       in order to bring back impact talent.
       I'd consider the "core personnel" to be the following guys:
       1.  "studs", which would be Baez, Bryant, Contreras, and Rizzo.
       2.  Add Schwarber as you suggest, now with his great second-half
       and breakout season.
       3.  Darvish and Hendricks would also be core. That's 7.
       4.  Heyward and Lester are 2016-2020 starters; not "core" in
       being long-term future assets.  But kinda "core" in that they've
       been around for all 4 or 5 years; will surely be around next
       year; and are "core" from a budget-perspective.
       So, that's 9 core-guys.
       I think Theo is looking to consider moving one of those 9 guys.
       But he's not able to move Lester or Heyward; he won't want to
       move Hendricks or Darvish; and he won't want to move Rizzo.
       So basically that leaves Schwarber, Bryant, Baez, or Contreras
       as the four core guys who might be hypothetically considered for
       trade in order to bring back impact talent.  Baez seems awfully
       unlikely, too.
       It might happen, and it will be exciting and scary and a big
       deal and kind of disappointing if he does move any one of those
       guys. But I think there's a very real possibility that Theo
       won't get fair value for any of those four, and that the
       "changes" will occur with the other supporting personnel.
       #Post#: 388857--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '20
       By: CUBluejays Date: September 30, 2019, 9:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Craig say the Cubs replace Hamels and Quintana in the rotation
       and Strop, Cishek, Kintzler, Phelps, Brach, Morrow, Duensing in
       the bullpen. Would that be a big change?
       #Post#: 388858--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '20
       By: Reb Date: September 30, 2019, 9:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Theo said—maybe even emphasized- that Cubs don’t know what will
       be available to them in trade market. So, would not be so sure
       about big moves with position players. Depends.
       Regarding Contreras, I think he was asked a specific question
       about Contreras and, therefore, went on in some detail in
       response.  Called him a potential league MVP. Pretty effusive if
       you take it at face value.
       If recall correctly, a year ago Theo kind of minimized leadoff
       at his end of season presser. Thought he was a bit more needy
       about it compared to a year ago. Guessing they get somebody
       significant.
       Basically agree with CBJ that bolstering top end of rotation is
       the move to make for 2020, if possible. As Ron notes, Theo was
       clear that the 2019 rotation was not the trump card he expected,
       compared to rest of division. Yeah, would be nice to still have
       Dylan Cease but not going to hit on all trades when you look
       back. That’s just baseball.
       I think that IF Cubs trade Bryant, it will be more a matter of
       getting something good for him now instead of watching him leave
       in two years and getting a compensation 4th round pick back for
       losing him. But, hard to see how trading him upgrades Cubs run
       scoring ability. Not really a fan of such a move now.
       Cubs have other major league players of value to trade: Happ,
       Caratini, Bote— with years of control and youth. And there are
       prospects of value to supplement trades, without trading top 3
       or 4 prospects.
       Kind of doubt will move Schwarber. After the break, batted .280
       and .997 OPS. Was hitting ball to opposite field and doing what
       they wanted him to work on. Among other things, not sure it
       sends a good message trading a guy who managed to do that and
       change his game somewhat.
       #Post#: 388859--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '20
       By: CUBluejays Date: September 30, 2019, 10:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Did Dylan Cease learn how to throw strikes?
       #Post#: 388860--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '20
       By: Ron Date: September 30, 2019, 10:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       craig - Thanks for the clarification and specificity. I do not
       consider Schwarber a "core" player, but I do consider him to be
       a valuable part of the team, and someone who could bring a
       substantial return were he to be traded (particularly to an AL
       team).
       Among the position players, I agree that Bryant, Rizzo, Baez and
       Contreras should be considered core players.  I don't think
       there is any chance Rizzo would be traded. Theo explicitly did
       not rule out trading anybody, and I think his suggestion that
       the failure to reach an extension with other guys who will be
       free agents (Bryant and Baez) will factor into trade decisions
       was meaningful.  Given the high probability Bryant won't agree
       to a deal, I expect him to be aggressively shopped. While I do
       not expect Baez to be traded, if he doesn't agree to an
       extension I think that is possible.
       I know some are skeptical or even cynical about Theo being
       serious about making substantial changes, based on his failure
       to do so after the 2018 season, but it seems to me he is clearly
       in a different place now, and I think anyone who listened to
       this press conference should come away convinced of that. He
       explicitly acknowledged that he was slow to accept the
       limitations of players who had made the team so successful in
       prior years. He also focused heavily on the need to build a new
       team that is built for the future, not the past. Hard to do that
       without some meaningful change in personnel.
       I fully expect him to try to force the issue of a trade or
       trades to make a fairly basic change in the makeup of the team
       on the field. Granted, he'll need to find a favorable deal, but
       I expect there will be some very aggressive offers for Bryant,
       if not for others.
       #Post#: 388861--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '20
       By: guest61 Date: September 30, 2019, 10:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Im betting Schwarber and/or Bryant go [possibly Happ,Almora,and
       Russell too],we resign Castellanos,bring in a leadoff man in
       CF,leave Hoerner at 2nd,and go after a #1 starter.
       I say we hire Girardi.
       #Post#: 388862--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '20
       By: ben Date: September 30, 2019, 10:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       CUBluejays, those are interesting stats on how much behind
       Dodgers our SPs were.  Thanks for those stats.  Clearly, we've
       got some SERIOUS starting pitcher issues!  Good starting
       pitching can mask lots of team deficiencies...and the Cards (and
       other teams in our division) should have plus starting pitching
       next year!!  We will seemingly need to land a #3 starter, at the
       least, to keep up, if we can!  Other pitching moves will need to
       be made, too, one would think (e.g. Lester as swing man?? Wick
       with a more prominent role)
       As for Schwarber and/or Castellanos, Nick CLEARLY fits the Cub -
       and EVERY other team's - lineup...yet with Boras as his agent,
       why should we think Cubs will outbid everyone else to land him
       (at a likely ridiculous price), particularly with our starting
       pitcher needs?  I'd love to think Nick would give us a discount
       due to how he mashes at Wrigley etc., but that's just not what
       Boras' clients tend to do.
       Maybe the future Kyle Schwarber will be the 2nd half guy?  He's
       now had 1.600 or so ABs and many scouts talk about 1,200 as the
       magic number for a lot of MLB hitters to better handle MLB
       pitching and gain more consistent success.
       Schwarber may or may not be close to Nick Castellanos as an
       offensive force next year or in future years; however, it's VERY
       clear that Kyle will be a LOT less expensive for at least the
       next couple of years and, as we look to add better starting
       pitching and other help, MONEY will be a requirement.  At least
       next year, we will be blessed with some things (and another high
       payroll is one of them), but seemingly not MLB-ready starters at
       the AAA level!!
       I'm not complaining (as what Theo et al have accomplished for
       Cub fans over the past 5 years has been unprecedented in our
       lifetimes), but improving Cub pitching in 2020 seems to me the
       #1 priority.   I'll always believe what Joe Torre said as Yankee
       manager, "I used to think pitching was 70% of the game.  Then, I
       became a manager and realized it's a whole helluva lot more
       important than that!"
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page