URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 361568--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '19
   DIR By: Playtwo
       Date: November 3, 2018, 7:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I like that approach, Dusty.  Who do you have in mind?
       #Post#: 361569--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '19
   DIR By: Deeg
       Date: November 3, 2018, 7:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Theo didn't sound like he wanted to be a surgeon this offseason,
       more like a lumberjack.
       #Post#: 361570--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '19
   DIR By: Playtwo
       Date: November 3, 2018, 8:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Theo is a master of the misdirection.
       #Post#: 361572--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '19
   DIR By: chgojhawk
       Date: November 3, 2018, 9:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Cubs couldn’t move Russell last year. They will get nothing
       for him this year.
       Finances will NOT be an issue this season. We will exceed the
       luxury tax threshold if Theo feels it makes sense.
       The team would prefer to not stay over the luxury tax for
       multiple consecutive years but no concern about doing so for 1
       or possibly 2 seasons.
       #Post#: 361573--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '19
   DIR By: craig
       Date: November 3, 2018, 9:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: brs2 link ---
       >
       > ...…. So at the end of the day, the Cubs increase payroll by
       only $7 ($14 for Hamels - $7 from Smyly)....  For the Rangers,
       they essentially get the Smyly spin of the wheel for $1. And
       Smyly gets a better chance to start. Win-Win-Win…..
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       AGree with logic, but the numbers are off by $6.  :)   Cubs are
       paying Hamels $20, not $14.  So, $13 in payroll bump.
       I don't totally see the "no room for Smyly" part, though.  If a
       guy is good as a starter, he should be good in relief; usually
       better, because he doesn't have to pace himself and can throw
       harder, and he doesn't need to be wasting pitches throwing his
       3rd and 4th best pitches trying to set guy up for 2nd and 3rd
       time through the order.  And having 5 well-used starters is no
       guarantee that they'll stay good and available all year; so
       having a guy in relief who could swing to rotation seems like a
       desirable contingency protection to me.  Whether he'd have been
       worth the $7M they'd contracted for that purpose, not sure.
       (Especially since he was never that good in the first place, and
       has always been a home-run factory even when healthy.)  But,
       basically other than their budget challenges, his situation now
       must be pretty much what they expected when they signed him.
       They new 2018 was a rehab year; and they should have known that
       coming off a rehab year maybe their would be no way to trust
       that he'd be worth entrusting a rotation spot to.
       Two things have changed, of course.  At the time they signed him
       then, they did NOT expect to be spending $128M on Yu.  Nor that
       they'd be looking at a $20/1 option on Hamels.  So, I don't
       think entering last year that they anticipated being so spent
       out as the ensuing months have enabled.
       2nd, I believe they had a belief last year that signing injured
       pitchers was a value opportunity:  post-surgery guys cost less,
       so **IF** health proves fine, you've got some bargain potential.
       I imagine it's possible that going 0-4 in gambling on
       post-surgery pitchers last year, that maybe they have
       re-evaltuated and chilled on that strategy, and are reluctant to
       play that lottery again this winter?
       #Post#: 361579--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '19
   DIR By: CUBluejays
       Date: November 3, 2018, 11:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Smyly had a lot of incentives in his contract for starting and
       relieving. If he was a reliever he could of made an additional
       $2.6 million and more if he was a starter.
       #Post#: 361581--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '19
   DIR By: DelMarFan
       Date: November 3, 2018, 12:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       After watching Gore's last at bat, I don't ever want to see him
       at the plate again for the Cubs.
       #Post#: 361585--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '19
   DIR By: brjones
       Date: November 3, 2018, 12:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Cubs will need to hire a new assistant hitting coach:
       Jon Heyman @JonHeyman
       Andy Haines was hired by brewers as hitting coach
       #Post#: 361586--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '19
   DIR By: CUBluejays
       Date: November 3, 2018, 12:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Andy Haines hired by the Brewers as their hitting coach.
       #Post#: 361589--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '19
   DIR By: guest61
       Date: November 3, 2018, 2:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Playtwo link ---
       >
       > I like that approach, Dusty.  Who do you have in mind?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I'd say go after Kimbrel first but as far as leadoff options I
       dont see many great ones.
       Pollack maybe and move Happ to 2nd and Javy to SS after whatever
       we do with Russell.
       Russell for Merrifield would be ideal.
       *****************************************************
       Page 37 of 456
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page