URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 12077--------------------------------------------------
       2011 Draft
       By: CurtOne Date: May 31, 2011, 4:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Go for it.
       #Post#: 12079--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Draft
       By: fredr Date: May 31, 2011, 4:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Theres a big dude in NC thats kind of a sleeper E Cunningham,
       remember the name!
       #Post#: 12087--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Draft
       By: Reb Date: May 31, 2011, 4:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Aside from the OF picks that have not panned out, there are the
       pitcher picks of course.
       In the last 20 drafts, aside from the great picks that got hurt
       and the unknown Simpson and the sandwich picks that did not pan
       out, there is:  Pawelek, Brownlie, Christensen, Noel, Jayson
       Peterson, Ratliff, and Derek Wallace.
       Maybe, at this point, we should forget about the history and
       just deal with the new guy on his own merits.
       #Post#: 12089--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Draft
       By: Clarkaddison Date: May 31, 2011, 4:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       At least Stockstill isn't doing the drafting any more.
       #Post#: 12091--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Draft
       By: Reb Date: May 31, 2011, 4:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Kind of an interesting report on George Springer.  You can see
       the risk with this guy too.
  HTML http://tigers.scout.com/2/1074509.html
       #Post#: 12093--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Draft
       By: JeffH Date: May 31, 2011, 5:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       We're certainly due for some good luck.
       How about this?
       Cubs draft Starling and he hits like Miguel Cabrera and fields
       like Torii Hunter
       Justin Bour comes out of nowhere to be a .290/.380/.560 guy
       #Post#: 12094--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Draft
       By: Reb Date: May 31, 2011, 5:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Somebody has hijacked Jeff's account.
       #Post#: 12105--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Draft
       By: Chris27 Date: May 31, 2011, 5:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       David Rawnsley:
       [quote]Using the standard 20-80 baseball scouting scale (50
       being major-league average), I would grade out Starling’s five
       basic tools as follows, based on observing him for five days at
       last summer’s Area Code Games (the grades reflect future grades
       only):
       HITTING (60). This is the biggest question that scouts have
       about Starling, but he showed little or no problem in Long Beach
       handling either quality off-speed stuff or high-velocity
       fastballs, and made necessary adjustments with each at-bat. Bat
       speed is not an issue.
       POWER (70). It’s not in the Josh Hamilton or Eric Hosmer realm
       at the same age, but the swing, leverage and pure bat speed are
       all there. This grade measures his degree of raw power, but most
       often the tool is a by-product of the hitting tool.
       SPEED (70). Starling is probably a 60 runner (above average)
       from home to first, and could be an 80 runner in the outfield
       and on the bases. He has an easy stride and has that extra gear
       when underway that could lead to him leading a league in triples
       one day.
       ARM (70). Some scouts at the Area Code Games were still
       believing that Starling was a better pitching prospect than
       position prospect as he threw his fastball at 90-92 mph, with
       little more knowledge of pitching than stepping and throwing. He
       didn’t pitch this spring, and probably never will again.
       DEFENSE (80). Starling has Gold-Glove caliber tools in center
       field and gets exceptionally good jumps on balls hit in his
       direction. This part of the game comes very easy to him.
       Cumulatively, those numbers grade out to an OFP (overall future
       potential) score of 70, a level that maybe one or two players in
       any draft will reach. If I was writing a report on Starling for
       a major-league club, I would probably be inclined to drop that
       grade by a couple of points, to a 67 or 68, because of some of
       the uncertainty in his hitting tool.
       [/quote]
       #Post#: 12108--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Draft
       By: Jes Beard Date: May 31, 2011, 6:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If the Cubs do draft Starling, I hope they sign him quickly to
       get him on the field this summer.  Make a quick,
       reasonable/generous offer and let him know that is going to be
       it, and that they want him signed and in uniform in the minor
       league system within a week of the offer, they will reduce the
       offer to some absurdly low amount, let him play college football
       and pocket the draft pick for 2012.
       #Post#: 12224--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Draft
       By: Jes Beard Date: May 31, 2011, 9:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       On Bubba Starling -- BA rates him the top HS prospect in the
       country --
  HTML http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/college/recruiting/2010/2610948.html
  HTML http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/specials/highschool-potw/05/17/hspotw.26/index.html
       Starling is a 6-foot-5, 190-pound beast blessed with wiry
       strength and tremendous athleticism. He's dominated seemingly
       every sport since grade school, developing into a regional
       celebrity. At Gardner Edgerton High, he's a superstar in
       baseball, football and basketball.  Take baseball, for instance.
       Starling is Baseball the nation's top-rated high school
       prospect, a do-it-all outfielder and a righthanded pitcher who
       can touch 94 on the radar gun. He's been likened to Carl
       Crawford and Josh Hamilton, a five-tool threat equally
       proficient hitting for power and average. Through nine games,
       he's batting .522 with four home runs, 10 RBIs and seven stolen
       bases.
  HTML http://rivals.yahoo.com/nebraska/football/recruiting/player-Bubba-Starling-95194<br
       />  Ht:6'5"verified
       Wt:193 lbsverified
       40:4.5 secs
       GPA:3.4
       SAT:22
       Class:2011 (High School)
  HTML http://www.swiowanews2.com/blogs/?p=376
       Finally, some stats, if only from his 21-game high school
       season: .508 average, eight home runs, 21 steals (though it
       doesn’t mention how many times caught stealing). Pitching wise,
       in 37 innings Starling posted a 1.89 ERA, striking out 53 and
       walking only 7 (about a 7.5-to-1 ratio).
       Awesome stats, no doubt. Stats that should be mentioned in every
       story about Starling’s baseball abilities.
       *I also found this breakdown of Starling’s swing on Baseball
       America.
       I just finished “Moneyball,” so it’s fresh in my mind. And I
       can’t help but think of the story of Billy Beane, can’t-miss,
       highly-rated baseball prospect, when I read Starling storys
       without stats.
       Early on “Moneyball” details the story of outfielder/pitcher
       Beane, who all the scouts loved because of his athleticism, his
       “makeup,” his speed, canon arm, five tools, etc. But even after
       Beane’s average fell from in the .500s his sophomore and junior
       years to the .300s as a senior, the scouts still loved him*.
       They failed to notice that he was a free-swinger with no plate
       discipline and other deficincies in his swing.
       With that in mind, I’ll be sure to keep an eye on Starling’s
       senior season stats.
       *Many in the Mets organization, who drafted Beane and Darryl
       Strawberry in the same year, thought Beane would be better than
       Strawberry.
       This post, I suppose, is less about Starling and more about the
       people who write the stories about him.
       Starling may turn out to be amazing, a major leaguer, a Hall of
       Famer. But the hagiography needs some hard data.
  HTML http://huskerextra.com/sports/football/recruiting/article_703f60d4-1d67-5037-8026-84ebbe0b639e.html
       [i]Another scout watches Starling in batting practice Friday.
       This scout's team doesn't have a pick until late in the first
       round ("We'll never get him," the scout says). He says
       Starling's speed is just a notch below the fastest
       major-leaguers. His arm strength is outstanding from center
       field. His swing doesn't necessarily wow anybody, the scout
       says, but that part of Bubba's game likely would be developed
       easily because of his strength and athleticism.
       Here's what I liked most about Starling: He ranged far to his
       left to cut off a drive to right-center field, wheeled and
       gunned the ball on a line to second base. The second baseman
       tried to cut off the throw before it reached the shortstop
       covering the bag. Bubba didn't like that.
       "Let it go (to second base)," he shouted angrily.
       Everyone says Starling is ultracompetitive -- he despises
       losing.
       "The scouts don't ask me questions about his ability," says Van
       Rheen, the Gardner Edgerton coach. "I mean, that's so blatantly
       obvious. A lot of the questions are character-type questions
       because they're not in a situation where they can take a
       questionable character."
       How's Bubba in that regard?
       "He is the highest-character kid you will ever meet," Van Rheen
       says.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page