URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 346925--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs Draft 2018
   DIR By: CUBluejays
       Date: June 10, 2018, 1:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is just social media, there is an actual guilty plea.
       Teams did the math and his talent wasn’t worth drafting him. If
       he was a #1 starter it might have been different. Personally I’m
       glad he didn’t get drafted. I have no clue if he did or didn’t
       do what he pled guilty to, but I don’t think it is worth having
       to risk having him in professional baseball.
       #Post#: 346968--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs Draft 2018
   DIR By: craig
       Date: June 11, 2018, 12:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ethan Roberts pitched 4 innings in Tenn Tech's win over Texas in
       their first game.  K'd the side in his first inning, then
       allowed one run, 4 hits, 1K/1BB over the remaining three.
       I hadn't paid a lot of attention to him during draft.  I know he
       was an outlier being drafted that high as a relief-pitcher for a
       program that isn't a traditional power.  But he's also an
       outlier in that he's so small.  Lists as 5'11" on BBCube.
       Will be interesting to see how the Cubs use him when he starts
       his pro career next year.  Strictly relief all the way, or at
       least in the minors will they start him to get more pro innings
       more quickly?  Or who knows, maybe he'll be one of those
       outliers who transitions from relief to rotation and sticks.
       #Post#: 346969--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs Draft 2018
   DIR By: Dave23
       Date: June 11, 2018, 1:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Per Twitter, deals are pending with 7th round OFer Artis, and
       24th round P whose name is escaping me
       #Post#: 346970--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs Draft 2018
   DIR By: Dave23
       Date: June 11, 2018, 1:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Blake Whitney
       For those of you who like tracking draft signings, follow
       @savermetrics on twitter
       #Post#: 346971--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs Draft 2018
   DIR By: CUBluejays
       Date: June 11, 2018, 1:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What I think is interesting is he is a high spin rate guy, but
       the breaking ball isn't describe as a plus pitch.  There has
       been some talk about spin and needing to be on the ideal axis
       for it to matter.  I wonder if they are going to try and tinker
       with that.
       #Post#: 347171--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs Draft 2018
   DIR By: Bennett
       Date: June 12, 2018, 3:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Patrick Mooney  @PJ_Mooney   41m41 minutes ago
       Sources: The #Cubs are finalizing an agreement with first-round
       pick Nico Hoerner expected to be worth slot value ($2.724
       million for No. 24 overall). The plan is for the Stanford
       shortstop to take his physical this week in Arizona and begin
       his pro career with Class-A Eugene.
       #Post#: 347172--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs Draft 2018
   DIR By: craig
       Date: June 12, 2018, 4:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I wonder if the Cubs have kinda for the most part bagged the
       idea of doing creative underslots to help fund overslots?  That
       was a huge deal with Schwarber, where they saved $1.5 and used
       that to sign the three HS pitchers.
       But I wonder if they've decided against messing around with
       that, for either procedural reasons or psychological reasons or
       both.  Last year, it seemed any of Little, Lange, Abbott,
       Thompson, or Uelman might have been given underslot.  With the
       possible exceptionof Lange, they probably all seemed to go a
       little higher than the media rankings projected, kind of like
       with this years picks; and with all but Little being college
       juniors without much senior-year leverage, you'd think that
       **IF** the Cubs had wanted to squeeze, probably any of those
       guys would have signed at 80% slot rather than walk away.
       Little did apparently go a little under ($174K), but that's
       peanuts.  Lange ended up a little under, but I think that was
       only after he failed his physical.
       This year, it would have seemed that both Hoerner and Richan
       would sign for sub-slot rather than return to school.  But it
       appears both are going to get full slot.
       Thoughts:
       1.  Only cash for overslots needs to come from the 5% overage
       and senior-signs.  Probably around $700K available to cover
       Davis, Roederer, Franklin, and any potential 3rd-day overslots.
       (If any, Cubs rarely do 3rd-day overslots, to my knowledge.) .
       2.  Operationally, I think just going with slot might make
       everything a lot smoother.
       a.  When calling during the draft itself, lots easier to call
       and say "will you sign for slot?" than doing negotiations for
       how far beneath-slot a guy is willing to go?
       b.  Perhaps easier for creating board?  "X at 80% is better
       value than Y at 95% value, but I still think that Z at 109% slot
       might still be a better value....".  Might be lots easier just
       to rank Z > Y > X, and take the top guy on your board who'll
       sign for slot.
       c.  Should make signing deal easy, too.  "You said you'd sign
       for slot, here's slot offer, sign here.....".  No negotiating
       required.
       3.  I wonder if there isn't also some psychology and "treat
       people with respect" aspect?  Cubs are very conscious of
       treating guys well, and having them love the organization.  If
       you're trying to scrinch Hoerner and Richan to go sub-slot, do
       they come out with a player-vs-management mindset?  Feel like
       they were getting screwed?  Feeling disrespected?
       So perhaps Cubs just feel like sticking with slot is good for
       morale and relationships and attitudes, and is so much simpler
       operationally, that it's just not worth it to mess around with
       sub-slotting guys other than 8th-10th-round senior signs?
       #Post#: 347174--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs Draft 2018
   DIR By: ticohans
       Date: June 12, 2018, 4:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For all the picks the Cubs had this year, their total draft
       budget was still relatively small, due to the fact that all the
       picks were very late in their respective rounds. You need more
       money than the Cubs had to successfully play the underslot game,
       IMO.
       #Post#: 347205--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs Draft 2018
   DIR By: craig
       Date: June 12, 2018, 8:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If trying for a big top-15 prospect, yes.  But you don't need
       millions to have access to interesting guys who'd be willing to
       sign for a million.  Cease or Steele-scale overslot, or Hanneman
       or DJ Wilson or Estrade from last year.  Cubs should have
       $0.6-0.7 to play with by going slot.  If they'd pressed Hoerner
       to sign for $2.0, would he have said forget it, I'm going to
       wait for a later round or next year?
       I'm not challenging the logic.  I think everything flows so much
       easier if you just plan for slot for most of your picks, and
       just pick the best guy you've got who's willing to slot.  Sure
       makes those phone calls easier, I think.
       And slot or no, you've still got shot to still sign one or more
       $1M guys in the mid-rounds.  Estrada last year.
       #Post#: 347215--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs Draft 2018
   DIR By: CUBluejays
       Date: June 12, 2018, 10:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Schwarber is really the only time the Cubs have gone well below
       slot and that was more of the Cubs really liking him vs the rest
       of the industry.
       Maybe they could of squeezed Hoerner for a couple hundred
       thousand or maybe he was going in the next couple of picks and
       had leverage on the Cubs.
       You are always better off taking the best guy on your board.
       Getting savings is nice, but your first pick is the pick most
       likely to reach the majors.
       *****************************************************
       Page 18 of 24
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page