URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 329860--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '18
   DIR By: Deeg
       Date: November 6, 2017, 11:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Lynn and Cobb will probably go for about the same money.  If you
       go strictly by career numbers and raw stuff, I don't think
       there's any question Lynn is the better pitcher.
       #Post#: 329867--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '18
   DIR By: CUBluejays
       Date: November 7, 2017, 7:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Cobb has much more upside to Lynn. You get the bonus of moving
       him from the AL to the NL, which will help his stats. Cobb also
       spent the second half, when he had better results, doing a right
       version of Rich Hill throwing fastball/curves. Coming off TJS he
       lost the feel of his knuckle change which is his best pitch. If
       he can get that pitch back he could be a #2/3 for cheap.
       Cubs Insider did a piece about Chacin having a better slider
       than every pitcher in the game not named Scherzer. His pitch
       sequencing was sub optimal and with a change there he could be
       significantly better.
       Throw in the possibility both Japanese pitchers are coming over
       and someone like Chatwood, who isn’t my favorite, there are
       plenty of starting options on the market that are better than
       poorly controlled fastball pitcher Lynn.
       #Post#: 329871--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '18
   DIR By: Playtwo
       Date: November 7, 2017, 8:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Cobb and Lynn seem pretty close, but I would prefer Cobb.  He
       has better control and has a better GB/FB ratio.
       #Post#: 329873--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '18
   DIR By: Deeg
       Date: November 7, 2017, 10:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Playtwo link ---
       >
       > Cobb and Lynn seem pretty close, but I would prefer Cobb.  He
       has better control and has a better GB/FB ratio.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Legitimate, of course, but I prefer Lynn.  Better velocity, much
       better K-rate - and on the whole, better results.  I prefer SP
       who miss bats, given the choice.  In reality, both are probably
       #3-4 starters assuming their elbows don't blow up.
       #Post#: 329878--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '18
   DIR By: craig
       Date: November 7, 2017, 11:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: CUBluejays link ---
       >
       > Cobb has much more upside to Lynn. ....  Cobb also spent the
       second half, when he had better results, doing a right version
       of Rich Hill throwing fastball/curves. Coming off TJS he lost
       the feel of his knuckle change which is his best pitch. If he
       can get that pitch back he could be a #2/3 for cheap.
       --- End Quote ---
       What I don't understand is why, if he has upside and could
       become a #2/#3, we'd think he could be "for cheap".  FA pitching
       is routinely expensive and in short supply, so supply and demand
       means price goes up.  The same things you like about him might
       also be liked by some, perhaps many, GM's.
       So I suspect there's going to be aggressive competition for him,
       and the highest bidder is going to need to pay higher/riskier
       $$/length than other teams think is reasonable.  Almost by
       definition, he's going to get more years and dollars than the
       rest of the market thinks is good value.
       #Post#: 329880--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '18
   DIR By: Deeg
       Date: November 7, 2017, 11:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I guess it depends on what you consider "cheap", but I don't see
       anyone arguing either Cobb or Lynn could be had for less than
       4-50, 5-65, something like that.  Maybe compared to what someone
       like Arrieta or Darvish might bring, that might be considered a
       good value.
       #Post#: 329881--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '18
   DIR By: Playtwo
       Date: November 7, 2017, 11:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'll take Cobb for 4/50.
       #Post#: 329883--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '18
   DIR By: CUBluejays
       Date: November 7, 2017, 12:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: craig link ---
       >
       > What I don't understand is why, if he has upside and could
       become a #2/#3, we'd think he could be "for cheap".  FA pitching
       is routinely expensive and in short supply, so supply and demand
       means price goes up.  The same things you like about him might
       also be liked by some, perhaps many, GM's.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       He's only thrown over 150 IP twice, so that is going to be held
       against him and make him cheaper.  It is a risk, but nobody is
       giving him 5 years and Brandon McCarthy is the only pitcher like
       him to 4 years and he got 4/$48.  I think s 3-4 year deal is
       most likely for him.  If he had multiple years of 180+ IP he
       would get more than what Samardzija got.  So he's cheap because
       of risks, but he has some upside too.
       Cobb has a career ERA-/FIP- of 89/92.  His best  year is 72/87.
       Cobb made an decreasing his change up usage and going with his
       fastball/curve.  He finished the second half with a 20% K% and
       Aug was 25.4% and Sept/Oct was 23.1%.  This was after he made an
       adjustment in how he pitched and his GB% returned to his career
       normal.  His release point was off on his split change-up so
       there isn't anything saying he can't get his best pitch back.
       Lynn on the other hand has a career 88/94 ERA-/FIP- so it is
       really close to Cobb, almost identical.  Last year though it was
       81/113, which isn't reassuring.  Looking deeper into his numbers
       his K% fell from a career 22.3% to  19.7% last year.  His second
       half his K% dropped to 17% and his BB% increased to 11.3%.  Then
       the big problem is his pitch mix.  He throws a 4 seam fastball
       39%, 2 seam fastball 42.4%, cutter 10.7%.  He throws a version
       of his fastball 92.1% of the time and his Curve and change up
       are below average pitches.  His fastball velocity has decreased
       and is likely to continue going down making his best
       pitch/frequently thrown less effective.  So in short Lynn is
       losing velocity and has no other pitches to help and is getting
       less effective.  I would stay far, far away from him.
       #Post#: 329884--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '18
   DIR By: craig
       Date: November 7, 2017, 1:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Playtwo link ---
       >
       > I'll take Cobb for 4/50.
       --- End Quote ---
       --- Quote from: CUBluejays link ---
       > ...nobody is giving him 5 years and Brandon McCarthy is the
       only pitcher like him to 4 years and he got 4/$48.  I think s
       3-4 year deal is most likely for him. ....
       --- End Quote ---
       I'm with Play, I'd also be happy to sign him for 4/50.  For
       reasons that you have nicely articulated, blue.
       I may be way off, and what do I know.  But I'm predicting that
       you guys are significantly underselling the market that he's
       going to get.
       I'm predicting he'll get a deal significantly better than 4/50.
       Lots of teams want a pitcher, lots of teams have the capacity to
       spend 4/50 and well beyond, and lots of teams are interested and
       willing to take a chance.  I'm also hesitant to assume that
       former deals are a good predictor for what this winter's deals
       will go for.
       Think he's going well north of $50/4, and that the winning
       bidder will be a team that's just willing to take on more and
       probably longer risk than the losing bidders.  Obviously with
       options, a deal can conditionally go beyond 4 years even if it's
       not fully guaranteed.
       If you want to play it safe, don't dabble in FA.  But if you
       need a piece, you may need to over-risk and over-spend and
       over-length to get that piece.  May not be Hoyer and Theo.  But
       somebody is going to take a chance well north of 4/50, I
       think....
       #Post#: 329885--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '18
   DIR By: davep
       Date: November 7, 2017, 1:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I would like to see the Cubs sign both Cobb and Lynn, if they
       can do each for about 14 million per year.  That would finish
       the rotation, and should still leave them some money to shore up
       the bull pen.
       *****************************************************
       Page 22 of 424
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page