DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Bleacher Bums Forum
HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Archives
*****************************************************
#Post#: 306178--------------------------------------------------
If the Bears are locked on a QB at 1-3...
By: Dave23 Date: March 28, 2017, 11:25 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Must choose one...
#Post#: 306180--------------------------------------------------
Re: If the Bears are locked on a QB at 1-3...
By: WshflThinking Date: March 28, 2017, 11:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The question is misleading. I voted for who I wanted them to
take but not at #3. And I really doubt the best QB choice at #3
is worth #3. Personally I would prefer a tradedown. And NO I
don't want the Bears to take a QB at #3. IMHO it would be a
wasted pick. Answer this question then if you feel differently.
Which QB would you want to draft #3 to be your starting QB day
#1? My answer would be none of the above. Which is why you don't
draft a QB at #3. #3 pick should be a day one starter at
whatever position they are qualified for.
#Post#: 306200--------------------------------------------------
Re: If the Bears are locked on a QB at 1-3...
By: Dave23 Date: March 28, 2017, 4:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The question is not misleading at all. I have no clue what you
see that is misleading.
If the Bears are absolutely dead set on the idea of taking a QB
at 1-3, who would you prefer?
It's pretty simple and straightforward. Nothing about what you,
or anyone else, would do with the pick, other than taking a QB.
Not a tradedown...not a defensive guy...a QB. It's not
misleading, and it's not difficult.
#Post#: 306201--------------------------------------------------
Re: If the Bears are locked on a QB at 1-3...
By: Dave23 Date: March 28, 2017, 4:50 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
And if you think I want a QB at 1-3, you obviously have memory
problems or don't read this topic very carefully.
#Post#: 306216--------------------------------------------------
Re: If the Bears are locked on a QB at 1-3...
By: WshflThinking Date: March 28, 2017, 7:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Its not guaranteed the Bears take a QB at #3. I hope they arent
foolish enough to do that. If they did I would hope they take
the worst one. However for the sake of stupidity.....the one
with the best chance of being successful it would be Watson. I
just believe he can be had a lot later. My stupid guess is it
really is going to depend on what SF does at #2. I think that if
SF takes a QB it will start a run. It might scare the Bears into
taking one at #3.
#Post#: 306217--------------------------------------------------
Re: If the Bears are locked on a QB at 1-3...
By: Jackiejokeman Date: March 28, 2017, 7:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
It's a one time only vote for a hypothetical ... cast your vote
... geez.
None of it count's except for the votes counted. :D
#Post#: 306218--------------------------------------------------
Re: If the Bears are locked on a QB at 1-3...
By: WshflThinking Date: March 28, 2017, 7:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I voted for whom I want the Bears to draft. Wake up JJ, but they
aren't taking him at #3
#Post#: 306219--------------------------------------------------
Re: If the Bears are locked on a QB at 1-3...
By: Jackiejokeman Date: March 28, 2017, 8:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[font=Verdana][/font][quote author=WshflThinking
link=topic=480.msg306218#msg306218
date=1490749100][font=Verdana][/font]I voted for whom I want the
Bears to draft. Wake up JJ, but they aren't taking him at #3
[/quote]
The vote is only hypothetical ... it doesn't apply to reality.
It's a "what if" comfort zone during the off season.
That's all. It's a way to communicate among us.
Casting votes. You should start one.
#Post#: 306222--------------------------------------------------
Re: If the Bears are locked on a QB at 1-3...
By: WshflThinking Date: March 28, 2017, 8:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Comfort zone?
#Post#: 306289--------------------------------------------------
Re: If the Bears are locked on a QB at 1-3...
By: Dave23 Date: March 29, 2017, 9:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I am stunned that Trubisky only has one vote...and that Kizer
has two...
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page