URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 6544--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
   DIR By: yapper
       Date: May 9, 2011, 9:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Short arms don't bother Angelo (see Chris Williams).
       Would be very surprised if Kirkpatrick, Linnenkohl or the like
       don't get a look by the Bears.
       #Post#: 6556--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
   DIR By: WshflThinking
       Date: May 9, 2011, 10:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: yapper link ---
       >
       > Short arms don't bother Angelo (see Chris Williams).
       >
       > Would be very surprised if Kirkpatrick, Linnenkohl or the like
       don't get a look by the Bears.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Same here, very surprised
       #Post#: 6568--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
   DIR By: navigator
       Date: May 9, 2011, 11:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I expect they want to get bigger and they also want guys who can
       play more than one position.
       An OL that is 6'2 with short arms you can't play much more than
       C, TE or FB
       #Post#: 6573--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
   DIR By: yapper
       Date: May 9, 2011, 12:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: navigator link ---
       >
       > I expect they want to get bigger and they also want guys who
       can play more than one position.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       This is exactly why we're kind of an an odd position with
       Kreutz. He is clearly below the median in terms of quality for a
       starting NFL C. On the other hand, if we re-sign him, we are
       pretty much forced to start him because it's pointless to
       reserve a roster spot for a backup C who can't play any other
       position.
       We either have to re-sign Kreutz, start him, and hope that with
       better OGs beside him he doesn't regress any more...  or we have
       to let him go, plug in someone new and hope for the best.  There
       really is no third option as far as he's concerned.
       #Post#: 6593--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
   DIR By: WshflThinking
       Date: May 9, 2011, 1:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: navigator link ---
       >
       > I expect they want to get bigger and they also want guys who
       can play more than one position.
       > An OL that is 6'2 with short arms you can't play much more
       than C, TE or FB
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       That would be ideal, somebody like Pouncey who could play OG and
       C.
       #Post#: 6673--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
   DIR By: otto105
       Date: May 9, 2011, 7:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Rex also took you to the bottom.
       #Post#: 6700--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
   DIR By: navigator
       Date: May 9, 2011, 10:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I still believe Rex's problem had more to do with our line than
       his brain. I think if he got behind a decent line with a running
       game he could make teams pay. As much as I dislike Wash, I would
       like to see him do well. All that being said, he isn't Jay
       Cutler.
       #Post#: 6701--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
   DIR By: Pekin
       Date: May 9, 2011, 10:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Any QB can succeed with a great o-line and awesome offensive
       weapons.  Cutler its three times the QB Grossman can ever be.
       He has a better height, athleticism and arm strength.
       Give Rex the protection and the receivers with a running game
       and he could be an ok QB.  Give Cutler the same things and he
       can be a great one.
       #Post#: 6704--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
   DIR By: wizard61
       Date: May 9, 2011, 11:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Rex had some fantastic games. He has to be one of the most
       hit-or-miss QBs in history.
       #Post#: 6711--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
   DIR By: yapper
       Date: May 10, 2011, 8:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Rex and Jay Cutler have a lot of the same tendencies,
       particularly the maddening inconsistency and especially the
       W-T-F throws that kill your team at the worst times.
       The difference being, Cutler has enough athleticism to
       counterbalance a lot of his terrible plays with great ones (as
       we saw in several games last year), whereas Rex simply did not.
       Much like Cade McNown, Rex Grossman is a great college QB who is
       too short, weak-armed and fragile to have any business being in
       the NFL.  The tools just aren't there.
       *****************************************************
       Page 15 of 344
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page