DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Bleacher Bums Forum
HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Archives
*****************************************************
#Post#: 257203--------------------------------------------------
Re: BBFFL 2015
By: Jackiejokeman Date: December 17, 2015, 9:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
What made me scamper off to the waiver wire every week to
replace drafted players
were how they were affected by other players injury's/ playing,
not on my team. >:(
TE Coby Fleener is useless without Andrew Luck.
WR Malcom Floyd had a Phillip Rivers year.
RB Isaiah Crowell is replaced by Duke Johnson ...
Ryan Matthews is going to start ... not start ... start ... not
start ... all in the first hour before gameday.
WR Torry Smith never panned out because of Kapernick ...
TE Larry Donnell & QB Josh McCown head to I.R.
Etc. etc. etc.
I think I picked up Manzeil twice and dropped him twice and the
same with Rawls.
You get em they dont play ... you cut em they play. :-[
So you go get em back again only to see they don't play again.
YAAHHHHH !!! Egads!
#Post#: 257295--------------------------------------------------
Re: BBFFL 2015
By: Grizzlybear34 Date: December 18, 2015, 5:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Rawls was a nice pick up for me JJ! ;D
#Post#: 257348--------------------------------------------------
Re: BBFFL 2015
By: Jackiejokeman Date: December 18, 2015, 5:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[font=Verdana][/font][quote author=Grizzlybear34
link=topic=348.msg257295#msg257295
date=1450437824][font=Verdana][/font]Rawls was a nice pick up
for me JJ! ;D
[/quote]
Yeah I wanted him back for the third time but you got him. :-X
#Post#: 257353--------------------------------------------------
Re: BBFFL 2015
By: wmljohn Date: December 18, 2015, 6:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
D23 - I don't know. I didn't check. The tie breakers are built
into the system it calculates them.
I assume since it was a 4 way tie they used head to head records
which broke down like this...
Mighty Smurfs against others = Gamunu 0-0, TOS 1-0, Pekin 0-0,
total record 1-0 =100winning%
Gamunu against others - TOS 1-0, Pekin 1-0 Mighty Smurfs 0-0,
total record 2-0 =100winning%
TOS against others = Pekin 1-0, Might Smurfs 0-1, Gamunu 0-1,
total record 1-2 =33winning%
Pekin against others = Mighty Smurfs 0-0, TOS 0-1, Gamunu 0-1
total record 0-3 =0winning%
FWIW I think the NFL does the same thing among teams with tie
records that are not in the same division with the head to head
tie breakers.
#Post#: 257362--------------------------------------------------
Re: BBFFL 2015
By: wmljohn Date: December 18, 2015, 6:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
From the league details page for tie breakers for standings...
[quote]Standings Tiebreaker
in this order: Winning Percentage, Head to Head Record, Division
Record, Total Points, Points Against (Schedule
Difficulty).[/quote]
Winning % for all four was same
Head to Head Record among all teams is what I just posted.
Division record would have been next Gamunu and TOS would have
still been tied.
Total points TOS would have it 1915-1781
Based on that I would say it was the head to head records that
they used to break the tie. If they passed that one up and the
next one wouldn't have broken the tie between Gamumu and TOS
then the fourth tie breaker would have gone to TOS.
Therefore it was the second tie breaker that set the standings.
Head to Head records between the teams tied.
#Post#: 257373--------------------------------------------------
Re: BBFFL 2015
By: Dave23 Date: December 18, 2015, 8:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I just don't think it should use head to head if there's more
than 2 teams. Otherwise, a team that went 1-3 would get in over
a team unlucky enough to have played anyone they were tied with
(0-0). We may want to change this, if it can be done easily...
#Post#: 257408--------------------------------------------------
Re: BBFFL 2015
By: wmljohn Date: December 19, 2015, 10:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The CBS system runs the tie breakers.
It is the same in the NFL. There has to be some kind of record
between the tied teams. If one team didn't play any of the
others it can not be used and it moves on to the next criteria.
#Post#: 257409--------------------------------------------------
Re: BBFFL 2015
By: wmljohn Date: December 19, 2015, 10:21 am
---------------------------------------------------------
From nfl.com...
TO BREAK A TIE FOR THE WILD-CARD TEAM
If it is necessary to break ties to determine the two Wild-Card
clubs from each conference, the following steps will be taken.
1.If the tied clubs are from the same division, apply division
tie breaker.
2.If the tied clubs are from different divisions, apply the
following steps.
Two Clubs
1.Head-to-head, if applicable.
2.Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
conference.
3.Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of
four.
4.Strength of victory.
5.Strength of schedule.
6.Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored
and points allowed.
7.Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and
points allowed.
8.Best net points in conference games.
9.Best net points in all games.
10.Best net touchdowns in all games.
11.Coin toss.
Three or More Clubs
(Note: If two clubs remain tied after third or other clubs are
eliminated, tie breaker reverts to step 1 of applicable two-club
format.)
1.Apply division tie breaker to eliminate all but the highest
ranked club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. The
original seeding within a division upon application of the
division tie breaker remains the same for all subsequent
applications of the procedure that are necessary to identify the
two Wild-Card participants.
2.Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated
each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the
others.)
3.Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
conference.
4.Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of
four.
5.Strength of victory.
6.Strength of schedule.
7.Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored
and points allowed.
8.Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and
points allowed.
9.Best net points in conference games.
10.Best net points in all games.
11.Best net touchdowns in all games.
12.Coin toss
When the first Wild-Card team has been identified, the procedure
is repeated to name the second Wild-Card, i.e., eliminate all
but the highest-ranked club in each division prior to proceeding
to step 2. In situations where three or more teams from the same
division are involved in the procedure, the original seeding of
the teams remains the same for subsequent applications of the
tie breaker if the top-ranked team in that division qualifies
for a Wild-Card berth.
OTHER TIE-BREAKING PROCEDURES
1.Only one club advances to the playoffs in any tie-breaking
step. Remaining tied clubs revert to the first step of the
applicable division or Wild Card tie-breakers. As an example, if
two clubs remain tied in any tie-breaker step after all other
clubs have been eliminated, the procedure reverts to Step 1 of
the two-club format to determine the winner. When one club wins
the tiebreaker, all other clubs revert to Step 1 of the
applicable two-club or three-club format.
2.In comparing records against common opponents among tied
teams, the best won-lost-tied percentage is the deciding factor,
since teams may have played an unequal number of games.
3.To determine home-field priority among division-titlists,
apply Wild Card tie-breakers.
4.To determine home-field priority for Wild Card qualifiers,
apply division tie-breakers (if teams are from the same
division) or Wild Card tiebreakers (if teams are from different
divisions).
5.To determine the best combined ranking among conference teams
in points scored and points allowed, add a team's position in
the two categories, and the lowest score wins. For example, if
Team A is first in points scored and second in points allowed,
its combined ranking is "3." If Team B is third in points scored
and first in points allowed, its combined ranking is "4." Team A
then wins the tiebreaker. If two teams are tied for a position,
both teams are awarded the ranking as if they held it solely.
For example, if Team A and Team B are tied for first in points
scored, each team is assigned a ranking of "1" in that category,
and if Team C is third, its ranking will still be "3."
#Post#: 257410--------------------------------------------------
Re: BBFFL 2015
By: wmljohn Date: December 19, 2015, 10:24 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I got out of the business of trying to figure out tie breakers.
That is why we pay the site to do it. ;D
#Post#: 257443--------------------------------------------------
Re: BBFFL 2015
By: Jackiejokeman Date: December 20, 2015, 2:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I figure the guys that do it for the NFL get paid good money to
keep from going insane.
They probably use the money for a quiet rest at a resort after
the season where only birdies are chirping. :D
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnzHtm1jhL4
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page