URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 236572--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
   DIR By: Playtwo
       Date: August 11, 2015, 5:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good move to play the percentages.
       #Post#: 236575--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
   DIR By: Ron
       Date: August 11, 2015, 5:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: CUBluejays link ---
       >
       > Jesse Rogers ‏@ESPNChiCubs  4m4 minutes ago
       > Maddon says when there's a lefty starter Starlin Castro could
       very well be the starter at 2nd. Addison Russell isn't moving
       off SS
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Ladies and gentlemen, meet your new Chicago Cubs SS, Addison
       Russell. Wow. The future sure has gotten here quickly (much of
       it anyway).
       #Post#: 236577--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
   DIR By: CurtOne
       Date: August 11, 2015, 5:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Russell will make errors but not because he wasn't focused or
       just being sloppy.  I have much more confidence in him.  I
       thought Castro would be the great star for years...don't know
       what happened to him.
       #Post#: 236579--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
   DIR By: DelMarFan
       Date: August 11, 2015, 5:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It's been said, but I think Castro is the prototypical Needs a
       Change of Scenery guy.  He's been hearing the Baez footsteps and
       then the Russell footsteps for a while now--maybe he just
       couldn't handle the pressure.  Or maybe the pressure of being
       The star on some really crappy teams got to him.  Who knows?
       It seems unfortunate for him that they couldn't deal him at the
       deadline, but I guess they don't want to just give him away.
       Maybe you still want him around as a potential backup?  In case
       of injury?  If it were up to me, I'm kicking myself for not
       trading him last offseason.
       #Post#: 236582--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
   DIR By: Playtwo
       Date: August 11, 2015, 5:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If the Cubs had known that Russell would be contributing in such
       a big way at the ML level already, they would probably have
       dealt Castro during the offseason.  But given what they knew at
       the time, holding on to him can't really be considered a
       mistake.
       #Post#: 236585--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
   DIR By: CUBluejays
       Date: August 11, 2015, 6:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Not trading a 25 year old 3 WAR SS isn't a mistake, darn shame
       he imploded like he did. Hopefully to trade him they won't have
       to take a bad contract back.
       #Post#: 236589--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
   DIR By: DelMarFan
       Date: August 11, 2015, 7:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yeah, I'm not saying that *they* made a mistake, because I don't
       know what they were thinking in terms of long-term plans.  I'm
       just remembering that in the off-season I had just about
       convinced *myself* that they should go ahead and trade Castro
       because I believed in Baez and Russell.  It seemed pretty clear
       to me that Castro was going to get traded at some point, so why
       not go ahead and roll the dice on the other guys.  Then I bought
       into the "it's too early to trade him" talk.
       Why is this important?  It isn't.  IF I had boldly proclaimed
       (not my style) that they should trade Castro now in the
       offseason, then I could shower all of you with ITYS and pat
       myself on the back (also not my style).
       Just kinda looking back on my own perceptions and wondering a
       bit about what the Theocracy think.  It goes along with most of
       the cool interworkings of the baseball braintrust--would love to
       know but probably never will.
       #Post#: 236590--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
   DIR By: CUBluejays
       Date: August 11, 2015, 7:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think it shows that being a GM is really hard and I'm glad it
       is Theo/Jed. Their mistakes have been realatively minor and
       their successes have been HR.
       I still think outside of Chicago Castro can still have a really
       good career.
       #Post#: 236598--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
   DIR By: Reb
       Date: August 11, 2015, 7:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Clubs thinking about trading for Castro first have to assess
       odds of a return to form.
       Is it 75%?  60%?  40%?  85%?
       If he returns to form---it's a club friendly deal (again).
       The contract--starting 2016--is 4/$38. If the assessment is 75%
       return to form and 25% the 2015 guy, then perhaps his worth is
       75% of that deal, less the risk he might be worth zero. If
       Castro was a FA, obviously not a candidate for a 4-year deal,
       nor would he seek a 4-year deal given need to re-establish
       value.
       So, guessing Cubs can get good value back from a club with
       assessment of high % return-to-form but with Cubs having to
       include another good piece as a premium for chance Castro worth
       zero. Perhaps some cash too depending on the 2nd guy.
       Think Castro situation is fundamentally different than the age
       30+ FA washout guys because Castro will be age 26 all of 2016
       season and high likelihood 2015 woes are a mechanical thing and
       not a guy showing his age or otherwise past his prime--injuries,
       etc. i.e., greater chance of return to form.
       Probably not a simple trade to make but a little creativity
       needed. Don't think Cubs will have to take back an undesirable
       piece as the only return.
       #Post#: 236600--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
   DIR By: Jes Beard
       Date: August 11, 2015, 7:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: CUBluejays link ---
       >
       > Sometimes getting the diagnosis correct and fast means the
       difference between life and death....
       >
       > In Schwarber's case having him do both for an extended period
       of time will limit his mastery of both. After his year the Cubs
       need to pick what they want him to do.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       "Sometimes" is not necessarily now.  There is no urgency in such
       a decision.
       *****************************************************
       Page 21 of 179
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page