URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 199964--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove 2015
       By: brjones Date: November 7, 2014, 4:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Craig, I just did a raw calculation of the slash line for
       starting catcher.  I took the 30 catchers who had the most PAs
       last year and calculated their slash line to be .255/.323/.407,
       which is right in line with the Steamer projection for Martin.
       Of course, this wasn't exactly a starter's calculation--a couple
       of teams had no catcher finish in the top 30 in PA, while a
       couple of teams had two catchers represented.  But just for
       simplicity, I figured that would be a reasonable approximation.
       I also think it's interesting that if you calculate Martin's
       actual OPS over the last 5 years (not just take the average), it
       comes out to be almost identical to the Steamer projection:
       .241/.341/.392 (only the batting average is one point off).  Not
       sure that means anything, just an interesting coincidence.  Or
       maybe I figured out the proprietary formula for Steamer.
       #Post#: 199965--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove 2015
       By: CUBluejays Date: November 7, 2014, 4:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       12 catchers with over 400 AB's had a wRC+ of greater than 100 in
       2014.  (14 had over a .700 OPS).  Of those 12, 4 had a defensive
       value of average or below average.  So near league average
       offense Martin is still going to be one of the more valuable
       catchers out there.
       If we go and look at Martin's past career his wRC+ has only been
       below 100 3 times (87,90,95).  His career wRC+ is 106, which is
       close to the 109 that steamer projects.
       2009/10 with the Dodgers his wRC+ was 87 and 90.  This is the
       only time his ISO has been below 100, so I'm wondering if he as
       injured or something.
       2012 with the Yankees wRC+ 95 and his BABIP was .222.  He was
       almost league average with a 2013 Darwin Barney BABIP.
       League average Martin is a a 4 fWAR player, without pitch
       framing.  He's good.
       #Post#: 199967--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove 2015
       By: grrrrlacher Date: November 7, 2014, 4:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       One thing I'd like to see the Cubs do in signing any FA this off
       season and next off season, is have the contract decreasing so
       that 2015 will be the most expensive year.  I think that would
       work out much better for the Cubs situation - low payroll next
       year and young guys getting more expensive 4 years down the
       road.
       #Post#: 199971--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove 2015
       By: craig Date: November 7, 2014, 5:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=brjones link=topic=209.msg199964#msg199964
       date=1415397685]
       Craig, I just did a raw calculation of the slash line for
       starting catcher.  I took the 30 catchers who had the most PAs
       last year and calculated their slash line to be .255/.323/.407,
       which is right in line with the Steamer projection for Martin.
       Of course, this wasn't exactly a starter's calculation--a couple
       of teams had no catcher finish in the top 30 in PA, while a
       couple of teams had two catchers represented.  But just for
       simplicity, I figured that would be a reasonable approximation.
       I also think it's interesting that if you calculate Martin's
       actual OPS over the last 5 years (not just take the average), it
       comes out to be almost identical to the Steamer projection:
       .241/.341/.392 (only the batting average is one point off).  Not
       sure that means anything, just an interesting coincidence.  Or
       maybe I figured out the proprietary formula for Steamer.
       [/quote]
       Heh heh, thanks BR.  Some very interesting stuff there.  That a
       top-30 catcher is .730, whereas overall catcher average is .688,
       I'd not have expected the overall average to be over 40 points
       below the regular-30 group.  Probably speaks to how much playing
       time backup catchers get, and to how bad some of the backup John
       Baker types are offensively.
       My guess is that for many other positions, the differential
       between the regulars and the overall isn't as pronounced.  Both
       because at most positions regulars dominate the AB's more than
       at catcher; and because at most positions backups aren't allowed
       to hit so badly as can happen with backup catchers.
       Also interesting how dramatically out-of-line Martin's 2014
       season was offensively.  A guy has been a .703 OPS guy over 5
       years ages 26-30, and then at age 31 he has such a wonder-year
       that he raises his net 5-year average all the way up to .733?
       That's pretty rare.    It takes a massive outlier of a season to
       raise your five-year-average by 30 OPS points.  Castro, for
       example, would need almost a .900-OPS year to raise his
       OPS-average by 30 points.  You need to be 150 points above
       average to do that!  Pretty nice.
       #Post#: 199974--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove 2015
       By: Reb Date: November 7, 2014, 5:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=craig link=topic=209.msg199971#msg199971
       date=1415402151]
       Heh heh, thanks BR.  Some very interesting stuff there.  That a
       top-30 catcher is .730, whereas overall catcher average is .688,
       I'd not have expected the overall average to be over 40 points
       below the regular-30 group.  Probably speaks to how much playing
       time backup catchers get, and to how bad some of the backup John
       Baker types are offensively.
       My guess is that for many other positions, the differential
       between the regulars and the overall isn't as pronounced.  Both
       because at most positions regulars dominate the AB's more than
       at catcher; and because at most positions backups aren't allowed
       to hit so badly as can happen with backup catchers....
       [/quote]
       Craig- Below is a link of a study by BA through 2011 season of
       "average regular" per position.  See link therein for their
       formula.  As you'll see, big difference between average catcher
       regular and average catcher.
       As point of comparison, the average catcher (all catchers) in
       majors had a slash line in 2010 of 249-319-381 (.699 OPS) and in
       2011 of 244-312-388 (.700 OPS).
  HTML http://www.baseballamerica.com/online/majors/news/2012/2613327.html
       #Post#: 200025--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove 2015
       By: shasson Date: November 8, 2014, 2:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       baseball prospectus has done scouting reports on the current
       free agent crop. I have no idea how the writers of the pieces
       get their info, but my sense is that baseball prospectus tries
       to be pretty thorough and thoughtful. The whole exercise strikes
       me as being a bit much for long-time big league players with a
       history that speaks for itself. But, since it's a hot stove kind
       of thing, just sharing it.
       Here is their conclusion on Lester:
       "Lester is a premier pitcher, good enough to anchor just about
       any rotation in the majors. He is as durable and consistent as
       any pitcher in baseball. He still has a few years left of his
       prime, but even after that, he should remain a competent big
       league starter, though likely not one worthy of the contract he
       will receive on the free agent market. Still, in the generally
       ill-advised free agent landscape, Lester is as sure of a bet as
       will be available."
       The full report
  HTML http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=24930
       their Martin report (they project him as a viable starter for 4
       more years):
  HTML http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=24980
       #Post#: 200049--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove 2015
       By: bitterman Date: November 9, 2014, 11:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I suppose we're assuming Bryant is playing next season and is
       playing 3rd, BUT if he's ticketed for OF than Chase Headley
       would help with D and his OBP was excellent after he went to the
       Yankees.  If you can sign him to a reasonable contract I'd
       prefer him to Martin (b/c I think Martin's contract is going to
       be exorbitant).  Than you have your outfield bat in Kris Bryant
       and an upgrade at 3rd in Headley.
       As far as Martin goes, he was not very good offensively 3 years
       previous to last (a player great during a contract year?).  So,
       as long as you are OK with him hitting .230 for 4-5 years ...
       and paying him a premium, than I'm on board.
       Unfortunately, not a lot of good players available from what I
       see.  I think you'll see Lester signed and than a deal of
       prospects for MLB talent...maybe revist the Carlos Gonzalez
       idea. (Maybe Baez straight up - Baez has K questions, Gonzalez
       has health questions.).
       Anyway, no roster moves have been made.  So it doesn't matter
       what you or I think because right now  Lester isn't a Cub.  Nor
       is Martin.  Until this team actually improves on paper, I'm
       unwilling to say that this team has turned a page.   And while I
       doubt Maddon comes on board without assurances that this roster
       will get significantly better, until that actually happens, this
       team is still the worst in the NL central.
       #Post#: 200050--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove 2015
       By: davep Date: November 9, 2014, 11:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have no problem with Headley, if he comes cheaply enough, but
       he doesn't really bring a lot to the table that isn't already
       there in Valbuena.  Offensively, Headley had only one year that
       showed the power that you want at third base, and isn't likely
       to recover it.  His plate discipline is similar to Valbuena.
       His power is similar to Valbuena.  And his defense is not so
       much better than Valbuena's that it is worth a substantial
       salary premium.
       #Post#: 200055--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove 2015
       By: ticohans Date: November 9, 2014, 1:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thankfully, offense is more than just batting average, so simply
       evaluating Martin as a .230-.240 hitter without acknowledging
       his excellent discipline and solid power sells his total
       offensive package very short.
       He's basically a league average offensive player playing premium
       defense at a premium defensive position.
       We can disagree about how he projects moving forward, but this
       is what he has already done, and players with that kind of
       history earn quite a bit of money, and rightly so.
       #Post#: 200056--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hot Stove 2015
       By: davep Date: November 9, 2014, 1:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I agree with TICO.  But one question that should be answered is
       how much better, overall, is he than Castillo, and is that
       increase worth 50 million dollars or so over the next 4 years.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page