URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 204832--------------------------------------------------
       Re: On The Farm (11/14 - 08/15)
   DIR By: AndyMacFAIL
       Date: December 18, 2014, 4:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: craig link ---
       >
       >
  HTML http://www.baseballamerica.com/draft/astros-nix-reach-grievance-settlement/
       >
       > Jacob Nix, Houston draftee, gets $1.5 settlement.  The note
       doesn't detail, but presumably it's a grievance settlement
       rather than a contract.  So Houston doesn't violate the draft
       cap and get doesn't get penalized for going over the draft
       limit.  Had the "contract" been enforced, it would really have
       killed them.  But neither do they get Nix's services.
       >
       > Would seem to be a win-win outcome overall for Nix.  He gets
       the $1.5 million he wanted, plus he presumably gets another shot
       to return to the draft and get additional million(s).  So he can
       double his money.  And perhaps end up in a less dysfunctional
       organization besides.
       >
       > Personal thought:  Houston just lost, lost, and lost in this
       whole deal.  They lost the players, they lost a bunch of money,
       they lost a lot of face/reputation, and they were perhaps at
       risk of losing additional penalty picks future, even is that
       didn't actually happen.  Two possible stories:
       > 1.  The common view has been that they tried to trick the
       system, tried to take advantage of Aiken, and their sins found
       them out and came back to punish them.
       > 2.  The alternate story is that they assumed their Aiken deal
       was good and done; were careless/hasty in advancing Nix until
       Aiken had cleared; and then they were double-diced when they
       both got the terrible news on the Aiken physical, and realized
       they'd gone way too far with Nix.  Lose, lose, lose.
       >
       > I've always thought story 2, incompetent dumb mistake and
       sincere concern about Aiken's health prospect, had Occam's Razor
       and had better explanatory power.  If they were just using the
       elbow as an pretense, even though they weren't really concerned
       about it's impact on his pitching future, I don't imagine they'd
       have carried things to the disastrous wall.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Where did you get that the settlement was for the full $1.5M?
       Certainly not from the link you posted where it says:
       --- Quote ---
       >
       > Jon Heyman of CBSSports.com reported the Astros and Nix had
       reached a monetary settlement, though a size of the payout was
       not reported.
       >
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I'm not saying definitely he didn't get the full amount but no
       one else is reporting he received $1.5M as a settlement.  So did
       you mis-read the article or do you have another source you can
       link to that verifies the settlement amount?
       #Post#: 204837--------------------------------------------------
       Re: On The Farm (11/14 - 08/15)
   DIR By: Jes Beard
       Date: December 18, 2014, 4:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: davep link ---
       >
       > I think that if he doesn't go first (or perhaps second) in the
       draft, it is because teams take the health problem seriously.
       He was quite clearly the top player in the draft this year, and
       should not lose any standing in next year's draft unless some
       teams are scared off by the health reports.
       >
       > Assuming, of course, that he pitches as well this year as he
       did last year.
       >
       > Even some top prospects who actually HAD surgery still go in
       the 10 to 20 range.  For Aiken even to go 4th or 5th, I would
       think that teams actually take the physical concerns seriously.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       If he goes 4th or 5th, that might indicate that 3 or four teams
       took the concerns seriously.  It would also indicate that at
       least one team, the team taking him 4th or 5th, did not.
       #Post#: 204859--------------------------------------------------
       Re: On The Farm (11/14 - 08/15)
   DIR By: davep
       Date: December 18, 2014, 7:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Isn't that what I said?
       #Post#: 204860--------------------------------------------------
       Re: On The Farm (11/14 - 08/15)
   DIR By: Jes Beard
       Date: December 18, 2014, 7:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Not at all.
       #Post#: 204862--------------------------------------------------
       Re: On The Farm (11/14 - 08/15)
   DIR By: ticohans
       Date: December 18, 2014, 7:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That seems like the Astros gaming the system, honestly.
       Either they broke a contract with Nix or they didn't. If they
       did, they should be penalized by MLB. If they didn't, there's no
       reason to settle for the contract value Nix was going to get.
       #Post#: 204877--------------------------------------------------
       Re: On The Farm (11/14 - 08/15)
   DIR By: StrikeZone
       Date: December 18, 2014, 8:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Peter Gammons tweeted the $1.5 million figure the other day.
       #Post#: 204881--------------------------------------------------
       Re: On The Farm (11/14 - 08/15)
   DIR By: DelMarFan
       Date: December 18, 2014, 10:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think they should have been penalized.  Beyond what
       circumstance has dictated.
       #Post#: 205200--------------------------------------------------
       Re: On The Farm (11/14 - 08/15)
   DIR By: Ron
       Date: December 21, 2014, 1:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       John Manuel ‏@johnmanuelba  1h1 hour ago
       Trying to line up #Cubs top 30, I knew system was heavy with
       potential star power, but also impressed by depth. Actually 30
       legit prospects
       John Manuel ‏@johnmanuelba  1h1 hour ago
       Doen't mean all 30 guys will be big leaguers or that I'll rank
       'em right. But org has many, many options/trade pieces.
       #Post#: 205287--------------------------------------------------
       Re: On The Farm (11/14 - 08/15)
   DIR By: craig
       Date: December 21, 2014, 9:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks, Ron.  That's encouraging, again.
       #Post#: 206579--------------------------------------------------
       Re: On The Farm (11/14 - 08/15)
   DIR By: JeffH
       Date: January 1, 2015, 4:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/01/minor-moves-dae-eun-rhee.html
       *****************************************************
       Page 9 of 278
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page