URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 163108--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Chicago Bears
       By: yapper Date: January 2, 2014, 10:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'm glad the media is grilling Emery on McClellin.
       Not sure I'm buying everything he's selling but at least he's
       addressing the issue in depth.
       #Post#: 163109--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Chicago Bears
       By: Sportster Date: January 2, 2014, 10:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Part of this organizations problem is being slow to change what
       isn't working and make it work...McClellin being a huge one.
       I've said since the end of last season he'd be more productive
       as a stand up OLB much like wth's his name in GB, Matthews. They
       kept playing him out of position, even as it was painfully
       obvious he was hurting the team there.....move at the pace of a
       fricking dinosaur....
       #Post#: 163110--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Chicago Bears
       By: yapper Date: January 2, 2014, 10:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So basically Emery is saying they still haven't found a way to
       use McClellin effectively.
       C'mon really...  how long does it take?
       #Post#: 163111--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Chicago Bears
       By: Dave23 Date: January 2, 2014, 10:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What if only the first 3 years are guaranteed?
       If all that is guaranteed is the next 3 years at 18 per, that's
       a great deal for the Bears...
       We can't grade the deal until we know all the details...
       #Post#: 163112--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Chicago Bears
       By: Sportster Date: January 2, 2014, 10:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If no one would be interested in McCown, even after seeing how
       he lit it up game after game and his incredible QB rating,
       poise, ability to make plays....it would be a shame. This guy
       is, right now, better than half the freaking QB's playing as
       starters in this league....
       #Post#: 163113--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Chicago Bears
       By: yapper Date: January 2, 2014, 10:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What if only the first 3 years are guaranteed?
       If all that is guaranteed is the next 3 years at 18 per, that's
       a great deal for the Bears...
       Except that it really crimps the money available to buy top-tier
       FAs to fix our D.  Especially if we can't get out from under the
       Peppers contract.
       I would rather we paid Cutler less the first couple of years and
       then if he stays healthy and productive, ratchet up the pay in
       later years when presumably we would have a solid core in place
       on our D.
       #Post#: 163114--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Chicago Bears
       By: Dave23 Date: January 2, 2014, 10:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Whether that's true or not, teams looking for a QB generally
       just don't bring in 35 year old career journeymen to lead their
       teams.
       obviously, Denver brought in an old man to lead their team, but
       a) they weren't rebuilding, and b) he was hardly a career
       backup.
       #Post#: 163115--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Chicago Bears
       By: Sportster Date: January 2, 2014, 10:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Do some 'heavy nudging' of Pepper to go be with his pal, Lovie
       in Bucland and take his considerably weighty contract with....
       #Post#: 163116--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Chicago Bears
       By: Sportster Date: January 2, 2014, 10:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well that's the big thing with McCown is his age. Hard to say
       how long he could play at the level he's at. One or two years,
       hard to say. His smartest bet should be to return here because
       he'll have a chance to play here. If no one is interested, stay
       put. He probably wouldn't be offered 'big' money to go
       elsewhere, but possibly more than the Bears could offer....we'll
       see.....
       #Post#: 163117--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Chicago Bears
       By: Dave23 Date: January 2, 2014, 10:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'd much rather pay him the big $$ in his productive years than
       be hamstrung with guaranteed high $ money in years 4-5-6, etc.,
       when he's 4-5 years older...
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page