URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bleacher Bums Forum
  HTML https://bbf.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Archives
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 155975--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Draft
   DIR By: Cubsin
       Date: November 9, 2013, 4:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I understand the BPA philosophy, but it's based in part on the
       theory you can trade surplus prospects at position A for another
       organization's surplus prospects at position B. Sometimes you
       can, sometimes you can't. The Cubs' current prospect base is
       heavily weighted toward infielders and right-handed hitters.
       They're relatively weak at catcher, TOR pitchers and left-handed
       hitters. If Turner is available at #4 and they believe he's
       clearly the best choice, they should draft him. But if another
       prospect is 99% as good and better addresses the Cubs' needs,
       they should take him. Scouting is an art, not a science.
       #Post#: 155979--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Draft
   DIR By: CUBluejays
       Date: November 9, 2013, 4:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If your going to have a surplus of prospects, shortstops are
       fantastic.  They can usually move to multiple positions and they
       are very valuable trade chips.
       #Post#: 155983--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Draft
   DIR By: Deeg
       Date: November 9, 2013, 5:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Stick at SS?  Turner makes the Baez/Castro argument moot the
       minute he's ready - he's a future gold-glover.  The only
       question with him is whether he projects to be a good hitter or
       a potentially great one.
       #Post#: 156001--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Draft
   DIR By: Jes Beard
       Date: November 9, 2013, 8:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Deeg link ---
       >
       > Stick at SS?  Turner makes the Baez/Castro argument moot the
       minute he's ready - he's a future gold-glover.  The only
       question with him is whether he projects to be a good hitter or
       a potentially great one.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       When Law doesn't rate him in the top 10, I would guess there
       might be some difference of opinion as to whether he is a future
       gold-glove SS who will be either a "good hitter or a... great
       one."  If you can be certain someone is at least going to be a
       "good hitter" and a gold glove SS, AND has been clocked at 3.4
       to first on a bunt... he would never miss anyone's top 10.
       #Post#: 156013--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Draft
   DIR By: ticohans
       Date: November 9, 2013, 10:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Deeg link ---
       >
       > Stick at SS?  Turner makes the Baez/Castro argument moot the
       minute he's ready - he's a future gold-glover.  The only
       question with him is whether he projects to be a good hitter or
       a potentially great one.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       This.
       This is why I'm so high on Turner - I believe he outclasses all
       of our MI prospects on defense, and it's not even close. You
       take a bunch of fringe average to average SS's and you move them
       to 2B and 3B, with Turner at SS and Rizzo at 1B, that's the best
       infield defense in the league. Lots of gazing into the future
       there, obviously.
       Most scouts agree that Turner has gold glove defense at SS,
       world class speed, and much better patience at the plate than
       recent speed demons, like Hamilton. He is, by all accounts that
       I've read, a hard worker with good makeup. That combination
       gives him an incredibly high floor, likely higher than Almora's
       at the time of the draft, given that Turner has better speed and
       has had success against tougher competition.
       Barring injury, I don't see how he becomes anything less than an
       annual 3 WAR player, and pretty quickly at that. There's not a
       safer baseline projection in this draft. Think Elvis Andrus as
       the floor - good to great defense with lots of SB's and a slash
       line that's quite comfortable from the SS position. The overall
       upside may be more limited compared to other 2014 draftees, but
       even then, some scouts see +15 HR's in his easy, loft-generating
       swing.
       #Post#: 157501--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Draft
   DIR By: Ron
       Date: November 21, 2013, 1:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'm ignorant about candidates for the draft, so I found this
       interesting.  Those who aren't interested in anything from John
       Arguello will want to skip it.
  HTML http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2013/11/2014-mlb-draft-shaping-up-well-for-the-cubs/
  HTML http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2013/11/2014-mlb-draft-shaping-up-well-for-the-cubs/
       #Post#: 157509--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Draft
   DIR By: jacey1
       Date: November 21, 2013, 1:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Turner seems to be a stud and i hope he is there for us...if
       not, Newcomb sounds intriguing
       
       #Post#: 157511--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Draft
   DIR By: CUBluejays
       Date: November 21, 2013, 1:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Beede was throwing strikes his fall in limited innings.  If he
       can continue that, he might force his way into the discussion
       for the #1 pick.
       #Post#: 157552--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Draft
   DIR By: Jes Beard
       Date: November 21, 2013, 4:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: jacey1 link ---
       >
       > Turner seems to be a stud and i hope he is there for us...if
       not, Newcomb sounds intriguing
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It seems that most teams with the first or second pick in the
       draft tend to go for a power bat or power arm, so Turner might
       actually survive until the Cubs pick.  Though I generally don't
       get too excited, or even interested, in things this early since
       a good or bad spring can change prospect evaluations so much,
       but I have to admit I am also becoming quite hopeful Turner is
       available.
       #Post#: 161416--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2014 Draft
   DIR By: AndyMacFAIL
       Date: December 22, 2013, 2:34 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Callis, Mayo take first crack at top 10 2014 Draft picks
  HTML http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article/mlb/callis-mayo-take-first-crack-at-top-10-2014-draft-picks?ymd=20131204&content_id=64384888&vkey=news_mlb
  HTML http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article/mlb/callis-mayo-take-first-crack-at-top-10-2014-draft-picks?ymd=20131204&content_id=64384888&vkey=news_mlb
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 161
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page