DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Banned-Talk
HTML https://bannedtalk.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 3004--------------------------------------------------
Was the Lockdown a Trojan Horse ,Deadlier Than Corona Itself
By: Beelzeboop Date: June 18, 2020, 12:09 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes . It was to alter perceptions .Instill fear to a level of
hysteria ,to create a new normal , which can be controlled
,manipulated,subjugated .
And FYI, Dr Mercola is being censored on both YT and Twitter .
Whats that tell you ...
HTML https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/06/18/social-impact-of-coronavirus-fear.aspx
HTML https://youtu.be/LIS6l16OyCw
Fear is a primal biological response to a perceived threat to
our survival. Fear triggers momentary paralysis and then a fight
or flight reaction before the brain can rationally analyze and
calibrate our response to a perceived threat.
Right now, people around the world are living in fear of being
infected or infecting someone else with a new coronavirus that
can kill those most vulnerable without warning. Along with
confusion and uncertainty, which prolong fear, many of us are
traumatized by the authoritarian measures governments have taken
in response to the COVID-19 pandemic that began in China in late
2019.
The "new normal" is disorienting, like we have taken a hit to
the gut and then to the head that we didn't see coming. Maybe
that is why so many Americans, who value freedom of speech,
religion, assembly, privacy and the right to work, have given
those constitutional rights up, without stopping to think
through the ramifications of the larger precedent being set.
We are slowly coming out of shock five months after the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control declared a public health emergency
on January 31,2 which escalated six weeks later into a social
distancing lockdown when the World Health Organization declared
a COVID-19 pandemic on March 11.3
Questions About the Lockdown Response to COVID-19 Pandemic
There are lots of questions being asked now about whether the
lockdown response to the new coronavirus has matched the threat,
questions like:
Why did the U.S. fail to immediately screen people at sea ports
and airports for illness as soon as the outbreak was identified
in China and got worse in February so they could be quarantined
and tested?
At the beginning of the pandemic, why were Americans told masks
were useless and to stop buying and wearing them, when now we
are told we must wear masks?
Why were U.S. emergency supply warehouses, which were supposed
to be stocked with pandemic preparedness equipment for health
care workers, completely empty?
Why were residents of nursing homes and other crowded medical
facilities not effectively screened and tested to make sure the
sick were not being housed with the healthy?
Why did U.S. public health officials persuade lawmakers to
almost immediately lockdown and home quarantine most of our
population,18 instead of using traditional disease control
measures that identify, quarantine and treat the sick?
Opening Up Conversation About Science, Health and Liberty
As we let go of fear and return to rational thinking, it is
opening up a public conversation about science, health and
liberty that is going viral, despite attempts by Big Pharma and
Big Tech working with governments and mainstream media to censor
it.
In the United States of America, we live in a constitutional
republic where democratically elected representatives make laws,
and state governments are a check and balance on the authority
of the federal government.28
American values and beliefs, which have influenced the adoption
of human rights in international law, are embedded in the 1776
Declaration of Independence33 and codified in the Bill of Rights
of the U.S. Constitution.34
Americans value autonomy and individuality. We believe each
person is a unique and independent individual with an
inalienable right to life and liberty. We value the human right
to freedom of thought, expression and belief; freedom of
conscience and association; and respect for privacy — all civil
liberties that limit the power of government.
We value equal opportunity for all and mobility within society
based on individual initiative and hard work, not on hierarchy,
inherited privilege or government permission. We are a
pragmatic and adaptable people who value the use of common sense
and practical solutions to problem solve, achieve and succeed.
We are a generous people and believe that voluntarily helping
others by donating our money and time is a personal choice
motivated by charity, not by communal expectation or a legal
requirement. Above all, we are a self-reliant, optimistic
people with an indomitable spirit and faith in our ability to
overcome adversity individually and as a nation.
Some of the core values, which have shaped our history and
defined who we are as a nation, have been put on trial in 2020
because we are paralyzed by fear of a virus that doctors say
could be hiding in the breath of every person who comes near us
and contaminate everything we touch.
Often described in military and apocalyptic terms as a war for
human survival against an "invisible enemy," the authoritarian
lockdown approach by governments to the coronavirus pandemic has
been framed as a choice between safety and liberty.
In horror, we watched the coronavirus pandemic unfold in
February 2020 with Chinese officials either chasing citizens
suspected of being infected with the virus into the streets and
dragging them away to quarantine camps, or using hammers, nails
and blocks of wood to barricade families into their apartments.
Then, after scientists and U.S. public health officials used
mathematical models to warn lawmakers to lock down the U.S. or
prepare for between 1.7 and 2.2 million Americans to die of
COVID-19, we were filled with an uncommon fear and uncertainty
that continues to haunt our lives.
The Fear of Public Spaces and Getting Too Close to Each Other
As most states emerge from months of quarantining people in
their homes and shuttering businesses, many Americans are still
afraid to enter a public space because we are warned over and
over again that the invisible enemy will kill us if we don't
stay 6 feet away from each other at all times, even outdoors.
Parents have been urged not to hug their children if a member in
their family has been exposed to the virus. In one city,
government officials told residents to take photos and report
fellow citizens who violate social distancing rules by getting
too close to each other outside.
We see fellow Americans being arrested for not wearing masks or
for walking on deserted beaches, or for taking their children to
empty playgrounds. Small business owners, who are struggling to
feed their families, are being sent to jail for reopening
without government permission.
Food banks are running out of food because families, some who
have never stood in a food bank line in their lives, have no
other choice. It doesn't feel right, but most of us comply with
the new rules, afraid to be the one who gets a dirty look or is
yelled at or arrested — or worse — if we don't comply.
COVID-19 Mortality Estimates Far Exceed Reality
Since the World Health Organization declared a coronavirus
pandemic in March 2020 and CDC officials predicted it could kill
1.7 million Americans, by May 22, 2020, there had been 335,000
COVID-19 reported deaths among the world's 7 billion people,
with about 96,000 of those deaths reported in the U.S.
How the death toll would have been affected if global lockdowns
had not taken place to try to slow the infection rate and delay
population-based herd immunity will be debated for years to
come.
Although the vast majority of COVID-19 infections are thought to
be asymptomatic, data show the estimated symptomatic
infection-mortality rate in America is currently at most 1.3 %.
About 90 % of people who die are over 65 years old, with the
majority of those people suffering with one or more chronic poor
health conditions like heart or lung disease, obesity, diabetes
and hypertension.
More than 80% of children who die from COVID-19 also suffer with
chronic illness and disabilities like immune suppression,
obesity, diabetes, seizures, developmental delays and genetic
disorders.
We all hope to live long and productive lives, but nobody
escapes death and, for some, it comes sooner than expected. The
sudden unexpected death of a person for any reason is a tragedy,
especially for that person's family and friends.
The deaths of tens of thousands during this pandemic or any
pandemic is a tragedy. The feelings of loss and helplessness are
magnified when individuals hospitalized with COVID-19 die alone,
separated from their families, denied the comfort of taking
their last breath in the company of people they love and who
love them.
Are We Really All in This Together?
Whether the new coronavirus jumped out of an animal in a Chinese
live food market78 or escaped from a biohazard lab, whether the
virus kills an estimated 1 to 2% of those symptomatically
infected or far less, this year billions of people around the
world have followed the advice of the World Health Organization,
government health agencies and doctors, who tell us that this
"invisible common enemy" must be vanquished using any means
possible because, collectively, "we are all in this together.
Public health officials have persuaded lawmakers to divide the
American people into two classes: those who are considered
"essential" and allowed to continue working and those who are
considered "nonessential" and barred from earning a living.
Small businesses and services judged to be "nonessential" have
been forced to close their doors, including day cares, schools,
churches, restaurants, theaters, barber shops and salons, gyms,
parks and beaches while, paradoxically, everyone is free to roam
through grocery stores, drug stores and big box stores like
Walmart, Target and Home Depot, owned by big corporations.
Mass Suffering Generated by Widespread 'Sheltering in Place'
Tens of millions of healthy Americans have obeyed orders to
"shelter in place" and self-quarantine at home for months,
sacrificing their jobs and losing their savings, destroying
one-third of the small businesses middle class citizens have
worked a lifetime to build, while parts of the travel,
restaurant, retail and personal care industries go bankrupt.
By the end of May, there were more than 38 million Americans
unemployed, representing almost 24% of the labor force, and most
of them are hourly low-wage earners who don't have savings to
pay the rent or buy food while they are out of work.
So, the homeless rate in the U.S. is projected to increase by
45% this year, with almost 1 million people homeless by the
summer. At the same time, Congress is driving up the national
debt in an attempt to delay the complete collapse of our economy
by using taxpayer money to pay people to stay away from each
other.
Fear of a virus has prevented people sick with heart disease,
cancer and other health problems from being treated in hospitals
that have been told to only treat patients infected with
COVID-19.
Neglected children and battered women have been trapped for
months in homes with their abusers, while calls to mental health
hotlines from depressed, anxiety-ridden and suicidal children
and adults have increased by nearly 900% and, in some cities,
prison inmates — even those charged with violent crimes — are
being released from jail with the justification they should not
be exposed to COVID-19.
With our children locked out of classrooms and the faithful
blocked from worshiping in churches, synagogues and mosques,
fear has stopped most of us from publicly questioning the
premise that the price of safety is liberty.
Few have challenged the mantra repeated over and over again by
doctors and politicians in positions of power that this
dystopian reality we are now living in will be the "new
normal"until we are all tested and everyone is vaccinated when a
COVID-19 vaccine is available because then, and only then, will
it be "safe" for government to give back at least some of the
liberty that has been taken from us.
(on a personal note .fuck you to all of that)
What we have allowed to be done in the name of public health has
no parallel in American history or human history.
No Lockdowns for Past Epidemics and Pandemics
The world did not lock down during centuries of epidemics of
smallpox, which was a highly contagious virus and had a case
fatality rate of 30%. Americans did not stop working to prevent
epidemics of diphtheria when that contagious disease swept
through communities in the 19th and early 20th centuries, with a
mortality rate of between 5% and 10% that was even higher for
children.
Societies have not closed businesses and schools to prevent
tuberculosis, a contagious disease that spreads the same way as
coronavirus and has a case fatality rate still between 20% and
70%.
In 1918, state governors did not order healthy people to shelter
in place and put tens of millions of Americans out of work
during the Spanish flu pandemic, when that highly contagious
H1N1 influenza virus had a case fatality rate of more than 2.5%.
So, why are the majority of people in educated societies like
the U.S. cowering in fear before a virus that does not cause any
symptoms or complications in the majority of children and adults
under the age of 65, and has a mortality rate of about 1%, which
is even lower if all the asymptomatic infections are counted?
#Post#: 3005--------------------------------------------------
Re: Was the Lockdown a Trojan Horse ,Deadlier Than Corona Itself
By: Beelzeboop Date: June 18, 2020, 12:09 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
In America, why are we allowing fear to erode cultural values
and beliefs that have sustained and defined who we are as a
nation for 245 years?
1982: Challenge to Vaccine Science, Policy, Law and Ethics
The profound ramifications of what is happening this year in the
name of public health and the slippery slope that has been
created is expanding the conversation about science, health and
liberty that has been going on for several centuries in
academic, philosophical and political circles, but didn't go
public in post-World War II America until 1982, when parents of
vaccine injured children challenged the science, policy, law and
ethics of mandatory vaccination, the most revered of all medical
interventions in the history of public health programs.
Mothers and fathers, whose children died or were brain injured
in the 1970s and '80s by the crude whole cell pertussis vaccine
in DPT, had simple goals: We wanted safer vaccines, more and
better quality scientific research to identify those children at
high risk for being harmed by vaccination, and the inclusion of
informed consent protections in public health policies and laws.
At first, defensive vaccine manufacturers, public health
officials and pediatricians met our request for safer vaccines
and better science with anger and dismissal Before Congress
passed the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act giving
vaccine makers a partial liability shield, but also
acknowledging that vaccine safety should be a national priority,
we were patronized. Then, when we refused to go away, we were
demonized.
Today, any person who talks about their or their child's vaccine
reaction or criticizes one-size-fits-all vaccine policies is
called ignorant. Any person who points out how low vaccine
licensing standards are or how big the long-standing gaps in
vaccine safety research are, is accused of being a science
denier and slapped with the "anti-vaxxer" label.
If you question the orders of doctors, who believe it is moral
to enforce "no exceptions" vaccine laws that sacrifice vaccine
vulnerable children in the name of the greater good, you are
called "selfish" for defending the ethical principle of informed
consent and refusing to offer up your child's health for herd
immunity.
ALWAYS QUESTION DOCTORS ORDERS .
MOST ARE PAID BY BIG PHARM .MANY ARE IDIOTS .MANY MAKE MISTAKES
.
ALWAYS ASK QUESTIONS IF THEY POP INTO YOUR HEAD !
If you protest against vaccine policies that deny people an
education, medical care and employment based on their
vaccination status, you are called a danger to society.If you
criticize information disseminated by the CDC and World Health
Organization, you are branded a threat to global health and can
be censored on the internet or far worse.
Strategies Creating a 'New Normal' During COVID-19 Pandemic
Does this sound familiar? It should, because it is the same
rhetoric and political tactics being used during this COVID-19
pandemic to keep the people fearful and compliant.
It is the same strategy that will be used to label you a selfish
threat to the public health if you don't agree to be
electronically tagged, tested and tracked by health officials
when thousands of COVID-19 "contact tracers" fan out across
America to test for COVID-19 infections.
It is the same strategy that will be used when you are told you
must get an antibody test and obtain an "immunity passport"
before you are given back your freedom to participate in society
— that is until a fast-tracked coronavirus vaccine is licensed
and your passport to life and liberty becomes proof you have
received a COVID-19 vaccine — perhaps simultaneously delivered
and tracked via a microneedle quantum dot tattoo on your skin.
GO FUCK YOURSELF FAUCI/GATES
Will a positive antibody test be accurate or does it even
matter? Every day, we hear scientists and public health
officials arguing about whether or not naturally acquired
coronavirus immunity means anything at all, while promoting the
idea that a COVID-19 vaccine is the only thing that will give us
immunity and save us all.
Tomorrow, the "new normal" in America may well include the order
to "show me your vaccine papers" before you can enter a store or
restaurant, go to school, attend a football game, get on a
plane, train or subway, obtain a driver's license, be admitted
to a hospital or nursing home, get a room at a hotel or walk on
a public beach, if health policy and lawmakers do not use common
sense to adopt a more balanced approach to dealing with a virus
that, so far, has changed everything.
There is no oversight on the decisions we allow scientists and
doctors with big titles and even bigger salaries to make
decisions for us that can affect the biological integrity of
each one of us and profoundly impact the way we live our lives.
Yet, science is not perfect, doctors are not infallible and the
risks of having a complication to an infectious disease or a
vaccine can be higher or lower depending upon the genes and
epigenetic history we inherit, the environments we live in and
the life choices we make.
Health Defined by Absence of Chronic Disease and Disability
The health of a society is not solely measured by the absence of
infectious disease but, more importantly, by the absence of
chronic disease that destroys quality of life and lowers a
nation's life expectancy because it often leads to premature
death.
In America every year, heart disease kills 647,000 people; lung
disease kills 160,000; uncontrolled hypertension and stroke
kills 146,000, and diabetes kills 83,000 people,188 while
millions more suffer cancer and other types of immune and brain
disorders.
America has the worst life expectancy, the worst infant
mortality and maternal mortality rates and the highest
prevalence of chronic illness and disability of all developed
nations in the world, even though we have one of the most highly
vaccinated populations in the world, with over 94% of school
children having received dozens of doses of vaccines for the
past three decades.
Today only 4 adults in 10 are considered healthy, while over 50%
have one chronic disease and 30% suffer with two or more. An
astonishing 25% of all children have a chronic poor health
condition such as asthma, epilepsy, food allergies, obesity,
inflammatory bowel disease and other autoimmune disorders,
developmental delays, autism, anxiety and depression and
diabetes.
In fact, chronic disease marked by unresolved inflammation in
the body is the No. 1 cause of death and disability in America
and is responsible for most of the annual $3.5 trillion spent on
health care. It is an epidemic that is crippling and killing far
more people than COVID-19 or any other pandemic in our history.
U.S. public health officials have no explanation for why the
majority of Americans are sick, except to blame the people for
making themselves sick by smoking and drinking too much, eating
junk food and not getting enough exercise or sleep.
COVID-19 Mortality in U.S. Impacted by Multiple Failures
Whether or not you buy that explanation, the fact that over 160
million people in our population are afflicted with chronic poor
health may be at least one reason why there have been more
COVID-19 related deaths reported in the U.S. than any other
country.
That, along with the fact that on March 24, the CDC told doctors
and coroners to list COVID-19 as the official cause of death for
a person, even if that person had one or more chronic health
conditions or had never been tested for COVID-19.
Mortality from COVID-19 in the U.S. has also been impacted by
the systematic neglect of well-funded federal health agencies
like the CDC and BARDA. The government was caught totally
unprepared for an influenza-like pandemic, despite Congress and
three Administrations appropriating billions of dollars to
federal health agencies since 2006 to prepare for a pandemic
just like this one.
Instead, warehouses were left empty without emergency supplies
of masks, gowns and gloves for health care workers and without
diagnostic tests, equipment and therapeutic agents to help
patients survive complications associated with an epidemic of a
viral respiratory disease like coronavirus.
That is because federal health agencies, which have forged
public-private business partnerships with the pharmaceutical
industry, have given most of the money Congress handed them for
pandemic planning to drug companies to build new vaccine
manufacturing plants and produce more vaccines for the national
stockpile.
As the World Health Organization, the CDC, businessman Bill
Gates and NIH's Dr. Anthony Fauci keep telling us, using lots of
vaccines is the best way to stay healthy and fast-tracking a
COVID-19 vaccine to market is the only way the world will ever
be a safe place to live again.
Pharma, Governments Cut Corners to Develop COVID-19 Vaccines
So, global pharmaceutical and biotech companies are now
developing over 100 experimental COVID-19 vaccines, with a
handful leading the race after being given billions of dollars
in funding from the U.S. government, the Gates Foundation and
other organizations.
FUCK YOU AGAIN GATES
Some of these coronavirus vaccines being created by scientists
will use as yet unlicensed DNA, messenger RNA and nanoparticle
technology, oil-based adjuvants and electricity, to genetically
manipulate and hyperstimulate strong inflammatory immune
responses in the body.
Some companies are skipping animal trials, which are an
important part of the vaccine licensing process to answer
questions about whether COVID-19 vaccines could cause
neurological reactions or more severe coronavirus infections in
vaccinated animals, or fail to work at all. These are only a few
of the short and long term problems that could have devastating
consequences for humans being vaccinated.
Some companies are cutting corners by conducting Phase 1, 2 and
3 trials simultaneously, but will they investigate whether half
of U.S. adults and a quarter of children suffering with chronic
illness are at increased risk for adverse responses to the new
COVID-19 vaccines BEFORE they are licensed and mandated?
Other vaccine manufacturers want the green light to deliberately
infect human clinical trial subjects with COVID-19 to see how
well an experimental vaccine works.
Enthusiastic "bioethicists" are jumping on board to help advance
this type of "new normal" in vaccine research, but parents of
vaccine injured children are logically asking why it is ethical
to intentionally infect humans with a new virus in a clinical
trial when for decades public health officials have insisted
that it is absolutely unethical to conduct a prospective
clinical trial comparing health outcomes of vaccinated and
unvaccinated children to determine whether vaccines are harming
far more than "one in a million."
So, while we are being ordered to obey new rules that require us
to give up our constitutional and human rights, drug companies
and government health officials are violating old rules that
govern ethics and the scientific method for proving that
vaccines are safe and effective.
Jacobson v. Massachusetts: A Ruling With Tragic Consequences
Science is not perfect, doctors are not infallible and vaccines
carry risks that can be greater for some than others, which is
why voluntary vaccination should have been unanimously upheld in
the 1905 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts.
Instead, the majority sitting on that high court more than a
century ago viewed the notoriously reactive smallpox vaccine as
a sacred cow and medical doctors as infallible so they could
affirm the constitutional authority of state legislatures to
mandate smallpox vaccinations during outbreaks. The court said:
"The matured opinions of medical men everywhere, and the
experience of mankind, as all must know, negative the suggestion
that it is not possible in any case to determine whether
vaccination is safe."
Using bad logic and bad science while leaning heavily on the
pseudo-ethic of utilitarianism, state governments were given the
green light to legally require vaccination based on a "common
belief" that vaccination is safe and effective, rather than
proven fact.
Piously waving the greater good flag to justify throwing civil
liberties out the door, the court majority ruled that citizens
do not have a legal right to be free at all times because there
are "manifold restraints to which every person is necessarily
subjected for the common good."
The Court said that state legislatures can exercise police power
to restrict or eliminate civil liberties, including freedom of
religion, during public health emergencies in order to "secure
the general comfort, health and prosperity of the state."
But the justices also warned that mandatory vaccination laws
should not be forced on a person whose physical condition would
make vaccination "cruel and inhuman to the last degree." They
said:
"We are not to be understood as holding that the statute was
intended to be applied in such a case or, if it was so intended,
that the judiciary would not be competent to interfere and
protect the health and life of the individual concerned. 'All
laws,' this Court has said, "should receive a sensible
construction."
One academic activist attorney has said that the 1905 Jacobson
ruling "is often regarded as the most important judicial
decision in public health." That is not an overstatement
because, in 1927, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes
used it to issue a eugenics ruling in Buck v. Bell that affirmed
the constitutional authority of Virginia to forcibly sterilize a
young woman mistakenly judged by state officials to be mentally
retarded.
Justice Holmes declared, "The principle that sustains compulsory
vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the fallopian
tubes," leading the way for mass sterilization of tens of
thousands of Americans that doctors and government officials
judged to be genetically defective, or morally unfit or
otherwise a threat to the public health during the 1920s and
'30s.
This is the tragic legacy of Jacobson v. Masschusetts, an
immoral utilitarian ruling that public health officials cling to
in order to justify legally requiring people to use vaccines
that carry a risk of injury or death and applying societal
punishments for refusing to do it.
State Legislators Primarily Make Most Public Health Laws
During this time of fear and confusion, the Jacobson ruling also
reminds us that it is democratically elected representatives in
state legislatures who make public health laws governing people
living in different states. That is because what is not defined
in the U.S. Constitution as a federal activity is reserved for
the states, which is an important check on federal government
power.
Elected lawmakers in your state can choose to mandate a few or
many vaccines with or without exemptions, while the federal
government has the authority to mandate vaccinations for people
entering the U.S. or crossing state borders.
It was this understanding that prompted NVIC in 2010 to launch
our free online Advocacy Portal at NVICAdvocacy.org that
monitors proposed vaccine-related legislation and helps
Americans educate lawmakers so flexible medical, religious and
conscience vaccine exemptions can be secured and protected in
public health laws.
Despite aggressive lobbying efforts by vaccine manufacturers,
public health officials and medical trade groups, until 2020,
vaccine exemptions and informed consent rights have been
successfully defended in multiple states over the past decade,
even though California, New York and several other states have
taken those rights away.
Now, it looks like voluntary vaccination will be on the line in
every state as the Vaccine Culture War, which is the tip of the
spear in a much larger culture war about values and beliefs
going on in this and many other countries in the 21st century,
is brought home to every person and every community in America.
Contact Your Legislators Now and Vote in November
You have an opportunity, right now, to contact your elected
representatives and let them know how you feel about protecting
civil liberties and vaccine informed consent rights in your
state. Sign up to use NVIC's Advocacy Portal to defend voluntary
vaccine choices.
And, when you go to the polls November 3, 2020, think hard about
who you are voting for and why. If you don't like the response
to the COVID-19 pandemic that your governor or other elected
representatives have made, your vote in this and every election
beyond this one could affect whether America will continue to
value liberty or throw it away.
Because if the state can tag, track down and force individuals
to be injected with biologicals of known and unknown toxicity
today, then there will be no limit on which individual freedoms
the state can take away in the name of the greater good
tomorrow.
Be the one who never has to say you did not do today what you
could have done to change tomorrow. It's your health, your
family, your choice, and our mission continues: No forced
vaccination. Not in America.
*****************************************************