URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Banned-Talk
  HTML https://bannedtalk.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 2181--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Round two of Corona in China?
       By: Beelzeboop Date: June 15, 2020, 9:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Unsure if it's legit or doom, but it's an NZ tome.
  HTML https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12339675
       Coronavirus: Crematorium data indicates China was lying about
       Covid-19
       Beijing's largest seafood and produce market has been shuttered
       and surrounding neighbourhoods placed into lockdown after more
       than 50 people tested positive for the coronavirus.
       Discrepancies in Beijing's Covid-19 reporting have been raising
       suspicions since January. Now a new study of Chinese medical,
       media and bureaucratic reports points to a massive cover-up of
       the outbreak's severity.
       A new study accuses Beijing's reported number of infections and
       deaths from the pandemic of lacking any credibility. And that
       will have had a severe impact on how the world responded to the
       outbreak.
       The preprint study, which is yet to undergo the scientific
       quality-control process of peer review, was published on the
       medRxiv early release service.
       The first official recognition of the virus outbreak was from
       Wuhan city in early January. But news of the strange new
       pneumonia-like disease began to appear on Chinese medical forums
       in late December. Beijing immediately cracked-down on the
       discussion and moved to silence the doctors involved.
       Much of what happened next doesn't add up.
       By late January, Wuhan's hospitals were already reportedly under
       severe strain. They offered 90,000 beds. Another 100,000 beds
       were activated in hotels and schools. Yet Beijing's figures
       reported only 33,000 Covid-19 cases.
       By March 23, 42,600 doctors and healthcare workers had been
       rushed to Wuhan from other provinces to support the 90,000
       already there. But Beijing reported only 50,000 cases.
       And where there's smoke, there's fire.
       Before Beijing's crackdown, China's bureaucracy had been
       conducting business as usual – analysing, assessing and
       reporting on everything about its citizenry. The researchers
       from Washington University and Ohio State University say they
       have tracked down this early government data and combined it
       with reports in state-controlled and social media.
       Among this data was the activities of eight crematories in
       Wuhan. By January 25, these were inexplicably operating around
       the clock.
       Based on such sources, the researchers argue the total number of
       infections and fatalities before February was at least 10 times
       that of the official figure announced by Beijing.
       Rubbery figures
       It took just weeks for Covid-19 to appear in 188 countries. In
       six months, the virus has infected more than seven million
       people worldwide and killed at least 400,000
       As the pandemic continues to swell, critical eyes are turning on
       Beijing's handling and reporting of the outbreak. The notorious
       information-management and censorship of the Communist state are
       being accused of delaying the international response to the
       crisis.
       "China's Covid-19 statistics fall outside of recognised and
       accepted medical norms" the study finds.
       But cracks are appearing in the great firewall of China.
       The Wuhan City Health Commission had reported 27 cases of
       pneumonia of unknown origin in December before Beijing
       intervened. The study points to other official Chinese reports
       from this time, indicating anywhere between 266 and 45,100
       unidentified cases.
       "Chinese media raised concerns about infections and deaths
       beyond the official statistics; for example, when the director
       of a fever clinic complained that he could admit only five out
       of 80 potentially infected patients, which suggested a potential
       16-fold difference between possible infected patients and
       confirmed diagnoses in Wuhan," the report finds.
       Another potential cause of confusion is the role private clinics
       played, it says. State-controlled Chinese media at the time
       reported these services had been falling through "reporting
       gaps".
       Such wildly varying stories have "led many to believe there may
       be serious gaps in our understanding of the outbreak based on
       what can be determined from this official government data," the
       report states.
       The US researchers say they have identified an important clue in
       the reported activities of Wuhan's strictly regulated
       crematorium business.
       Typically, these are restricted to operating just four hours
       each day. This is usually in the morning in keeping with Chinese
       funeral traditions.
       But by January 25, the crematoriums were operating at six times
       their regulated rate.
       They were burning 24 hours a day.
       The report estimates the usual funeral figure for a city of nine
       million people would be about 136 a day. Escalating operations
       by up to six times enables about 816 daily cremations. With
       mobile crematories known to be in action, the peak daily figure
       could have been as high as 2100.
       The study tracked the sale of funeral urns to verify the
       estimates. In the January-March period during which the
       crematoriums were operating at peak levels, some 36,000 had been
       distributed.
       The report says it took 14 days before the drastic lockdown
       measures imposed upon Wuhan on January 23 began to take effect.
       By this time, it says the death toll was already likely in the
       tens of thousands.
       "The estimates of cumulative deaths, based on both funeral urns
       distribution and continuous full capacity operation of cremation
       services up to March 23, 2020, give results around 36,000, more
       than 10 times of the official death toll of 2524," it reads.
       The study says that, based on its inferred data, China may have
       had anywhere between 305,000 and 1.27 million Covid-19 cases by
       February 7. The number of dead, it finds, was likely already
       about 6800 to 7200.
       Official figures released by Beijing at this time reported only
       13,600 infections and 545 dead.
       "The magnitude of discrepancy between our estimates based on
       cremation related data and Chinese official figures in early
       February, the critical time for response to the Covid-19
       pandemic, suggests the need to re-evaluate official statistics
       from China and consider all available and reasonable data
       sources for a better understanding of the Covid-19 pandemic,"
       the study asserts.
       A slew of unconfirmed evidence has since pointed to origins
       possibly as early as August. This has ranged from unconfirmed US
       spy-agency wiretap and intelligence reports to data analysis of
       population movements and purchasing patterns.
       This study applies Covid-19 uncontrolled "doubling rate" to the
       newly inferred infected figures to come up with a potential
       October origin.
       "If the doubling time 6.4 is close to the truth, there was
       significant under- and delayed reporting of the Covid-19
       epidemic information by China in late January and early
       February, the critical time for the world to respond and prepare
       for the pandemic," the study finds.
       "Given the serious implications of the Covid-19 pandemic,
       further investigations into this period in China needs to be
       carried out."
       Discrepancies in Beijing's response to the Wuhan crisis and its
       publicly declared position have been raising suspicions for
       months. But the challenges of finding reliable data to test
       these claims remains significant.
       "Readers are reminded of the assumptions that underlie our
       estimates, and they should, therefore, be taken as approximate,"
       the study's authors warn.
       "However, even if there were non-negligible reporting errors in
       these new data, the magnitude of the discrepancy between the
       results from their analysis and China's official figures
       suggests that the potential impact on the global efforts to
       control the pandemic is obvious."
       #Post#: 2182--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Round two of Corona in China?
       By: solo Date: June 15, 2020, 9:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote
       author=𝕭𝖊𝖊𝖑𝖟𝖊&#1
       20173;𝖔𝖔𝖕
       link=topic=127.msg2175#msg2175 date=1592231498]
       Beijing is insane, but Hong Kong is actually worse. More
       westernized though.
       So more amenable to us round eyes.
       [/quote]
       I work with a city girl first generation, well I did last school
       year. She's told me how expensive housing costs are in a few
       places.
       Let's hope they get a handle on this early.
       #Post#: 2183--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Round two of Corona in China?
       By: solo Date: June 15, 2020, 9:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote
       author=𝕭𝖊𝖊𝖑𝖟𝖊&#1
       20173;𝖔𝖔𝖕
       link=topic=127.msg2181#msg2181 date=1592232303]
       Unsure if it's legit or doom, but it's an NZ tome.
  HTML https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12339675
       Coronavirus: Crematorium data indicates China was lying about
       Covid-19
       Beijing's largest seafood and produce market has been shuttered
       and surrounding neighbourhoods placed into lockdown after more
       than 50 people tested positive for the coronavirus.
       Discrepancies in Beijing's Covid-19 reporting have been raising
       suspicions since January. Now a new study of Chinese medical,
       media and bureaucratic reports points to a massive cover-up of
       the outbreak's severity.
       A new study accuses Beijing's reported number of infections and
       deaths from the pandemic of lacking any credibility. And that
       will have had a severe impact on how the world responded to the
       outbreak.
       The preprint study, which is yet to undergo the scientific
       quality-control process of peer review, was published on the
       medRxiv early release service.
       The first official recognition of the virus outbreak was from
       Wuhan city in early January. But news of the strange new
       pneumonia-like disease began to appear on Chinese medical forums
       in late December. Beijing immediately cracked-down on the
       discussion and moved to silence the doctors involved.
       Much of what happened next doesn't add up.
       By late January, Wuhan's hospitals were already reportedly under
       severe strain. They offered 90,000 beds. Another 100,000 beds
       were activated in hotels and schools. Yet Beijing's figures
       reported only 33,000 Covid-19 cases.
       By March 23, 42,600 doctors and healthcare workers had been
       rushed to Wuhan from other provinces to support the 90,000
       already there. But Beijing reported only 50,000 cases.
       And where there's smoke, there's fire.
       Before Beijing's crackdown, China's bureaucracy had been
       conducting business as usual – analysing, assessing and
       reporting on everything about its citizenry. The researchers
       from Washington University and Ohio State University say they
       have tracked down this early government data and combined it
       with reports in state-controlled and social media.
       Among this data was the activities of eight crematories in
       Wuhan. By January 25, these were inexplicably operating around
       the clock.
       Based on such sources, the researchers argue the total number of
       infections and fatalities before February was at least 10 times
       that of the official figure announced by Beijing.
       Rubbery figures
       It took just weeks for Covid-19 to appear in 188 countries. In
       six months, the virus has infected more than seven million
       people worldwide and killed at least 400,000
       As the pandemic continues to swell, critical eyes are turning on
       Beijing's handling and reporting of the outbreak. The notorious
       information-management and censorship of the Communist state are
       being accused of delaying the international response to the
       crisis.
       "China's Covid-19 statistics fall outside of recognised and
       accepted medical norms" the study finds.
       But cracks are appearing in the great firewall of China.
       The Wuhan City Health Commission had reported 27 cases of
       pneumonia of unknown origin in December before Beijing
       intervened. The study points to other official Chinese reports
       from this time, indicating anywhere between 266 and 45,100
       unidentified cases.
       "Chinese media raised concerns about infections and deaths
       beyond the official statistics; for example, when the director
       of a fever clinic complained that he could admit only five out
       of 80 potentially infected patients, which suggested a potential
       16-fold difference between possible infected patients and
       confirmed diagnoses in Wuhan," the report finds.
       Another potential cause of confusion is the role private clinics
       played, it says. State-controlled Chinese media at the time
       reported these services had been falling through "reporting
       gaps".
       Such wildly varying stories have "led many to believe there may
       be serious gaps in our understanding of the outbreak based on
       what can be determined from this official government data," the
       report states.
       The US researchers say they have identified an important clue in
       the reported activities of Wuhan's strictly regulated
       crematorium business.
       Typically, these are restricted to operating just four hours
       each day. This is usually in the morning in keeping with Chinese
       funeral traditions.
       But by January 25, the crematoriums were operating at six times
       their regulated rate.
       They were burning 24 hours a day.
       The report estimates the usual funeral figure for a city of nine
       million people would be about 136 a day. Escalating operations
       by up to six times enables about 816 daily cremations. With
       mobile crematories known to be in action, the peak daily figure
       could have been as high as 2100.
       The study tracked the sale of funeral urns to verify the
       estimates. In the January-March period during which the
       crematoriums were operating at peak levels, some 36,000 had been
       distributed.
       The report says it took 14 days before the drastic lockdown
       measures imposed upon Wuhan on January 23 began to take effect.
       By this time, it says the death toll was already likely in the
       tens of thousands.
       "The estimates of cumulative deaths, based on both funeral urns
       distribution and continuous full capacity operation of cremation
       services up to March 23, 2020, give results around 36,000, more
       than 10 times of the official death toll of 2524," it reads.
       The study says that, based on its inferred data, China may have
       had anywhere between 305,000 and 1.27 million Covid-19 cases by
       February 7. The number of dead, it finds, was likely already
       about 6800 to 7200.
       Official figures released by Beijing at this time reported only
       13,600 infections and 545 dead.
       "The magnitude of discrepancy between our estimates based on
       cremation related data and Chinese official figures in early
       February, the critical time for response to the Covid-19
       pandemic, suggests the need to re-evaluate official statistics
       from China and consider all available and reasonable data
       sources for a better understanding of the Covid-19 pandemic,"
       the study asserts.
       A slew of unconfirmed evidence has since pointed to origins
       possibly as early as August. This has ranged from unconfirmed US
       spy-agency wiretap and intelligence reports to data analysis of
       population movements and purchasing patterns.
       This study applies Covid-19 uncontrolled "doubling rate" to the
       newly inferred infected figures to come up with a potential
       October origin.
       "If the doubling time 6.4 is close to the truth, there was
       significant under- and delayed reporting of the Covid-19
       epidemic information by China in late January and early
       February, the critical time for the world to respond and prepare
       for the pandemic," the study finds.
       "Given the serious implications of the Covid-19 pandemic,
       further investigations into this period in China needs to be
       carried out."
       Discrepancies in Beijing's response to the Wuhan crisis and its
       publicly declared position have been raising suspicions for
       months. But the challenges of finding reliable data to test
       these claims remains significant.
       "Readers are reminded of the assumptions that underlie our
       estimates, and they should, therefore, be taken as approximate,"
       the study's authors warn.
       "However, even if there were non-negligible reporting errors in
       these new data, the magnitude of the discrepancy between the
       results from their analysis and China's official figures
       suggests that the potential impact on the global efforts to
       control the pandemic is obvious."
       [/quote]
       That's terrifying. I also recall the "journalist" who supposedly
       disappeared who was one of the first to report on the proximity
       of the lab to what was "called" the first location of outbreak.
       Have to use the wayback
  HTML https://web.archive.org/web/20200214144447/https:/www.researchgate.net/publication/339070128_The_possible_origins_of_2019-nCoV_coronavirus
       Good news is everyone should be much better prepared for waves
       now.
       I'd just like to have cousins over to swim, travel a bit this
       summer, have an answer for my kids when things will get better
       etc.
       So fking depressing.
       #Post#: 2186--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Round two of Corona in China?
       By: LunaC Date: June 15, 2020, 10:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=solo link=topic=127.msg2183#msg2183
       date=1592232795]
       That's terrifying. I also recall the "journalist" who supposedly
       disappeared who was one of the first to report on the proximity
       of the lab to what was "called" the first location of outbreak.
       Have to use the wayback
  HTML https://web.archive.org/web/20200214144447/https:/www.researchgate.net/publication/339070128_The_possible_origins_of_2019-nCoV_coronavirus
       Good news is everyone should be much better prepared for waves
       now.
       I'd just like to have cousins over to swim, travel a bit this
       summer, have an answer for my kids when things will get better
       etc.
       So fking depressing.
       [/quote]
       Yeah I'm positive china under reported deaths. Everything I've
       seen from them and WHO suggest a conspiracy to bolster the
       information campaign feeding into US instability. Make it look
       like China did everything right and smear the US response and
       numbers as an inefficiency of government. But really China just
       lying to look good and troll us. I just want normal life too.
       But Internationally powerful people have realized how great
       covid is for getting shit done and leaving us ignorant. The last
       thing the Bill Gates' in the world want is for covid to end.
       Vaccine is a shame imho considering we've attempted to develop
       one for coronavirus' for decades with no success. Now it
       miraculously happens and there is no literature to tell anyone
       how. Smells fake.
       #Post#: 2187--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Round two of Corona in China?
       By: Beelzeboop Date: June 15, 2020, 10:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       WHO is owned by the NWO
       #Post#: 2190--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Round two of Corona in China?
       By: solo Date: June 15, 2020, 10:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=LunaC link=topic=127.msg2186#msg2186
       date=1592233268]
       Yeah I'm positive china under reported deaths. Everything I've
       seen from them and WHO suggest a conspiracy to bolster the
       information campaign feeding into US instability. Make it look
       like China did everything right and smear the US response and
       numbers as an inefficiency of government. But really China just
       lying to look good and troll us. I just want normal life too.
       But Internationally powerful people have realized how great
       covid is for getting shit done and leaving us ignorant. The last
       thing the Bill Gates' in the world want is for covid to end.
       Vaccine is a shame imho considering we've attempted to develop
       one for coronavirus' for decades with no success. Now it
       miraculously happens and there is no literature to tell anyone
       how. Smells fake.
       [/quote]
       The "window" of opportunity is there for the Fabians, no doubt.
       And they will seize it.
  HTML https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsehistory/files/2017/09/Tony-Blair-and-the-Fabian-Window-in-the-Shaw-Library-20-April-2006-credit-LSE-Nigel-Stead.jpg
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDez_cjgTZ4
       #Post#: 2274--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Round two of Corona in China?
       By: Saint Date: June 15, 2020, 4:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       China can handle it..  :ohshit:
       #Post#: 2276--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Round two of Corona in China?
       By: LunaC Date: June 15, 2020, 4:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Saint link=topic=127.msg2274#msg2274
       date=1592255755]
       China can handle it..  :ohshit:
       [/quote]
       :the:
       Yup
       :chuckle:
       #Post#: 2287--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Round two of Corona in China?
       By: Saint Date: June 15, 2020, 4:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I’m not buying this second wave, anxiety program that the
       corona, panic people are spewing.
       You certainly work out who not to be in around in a pandemic,
       fast. We just had two weeks of no new cases in my state and our
       state was the worst hit.. still people are saying the threat is
       there.. fear mongering.
       I went out into a big shopping mall on the weekend and the place
       was packed, no one is social distancing, cafes and restaurants
       are packed. It’s like it never happened.
       #Post#: 2292--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Round two of Corona in China?
       By: LunaC Date: June 15, 2020, 4:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Saint link=topic=127.msg2287#msg2287
       date=1592256809]
       I’m not buying this second wave, anxiety program that the
       corona, panic people are spewing.
       You certainly work out who not to be in around in a pandemic,
       fast. We just had two weeks of no new cases in my state and our
       state was the worst hit.. still people are saying the threat is
       there.. fear mongering.
       I went out into a big shopping mall on the weekend and the place
       was packed, no one is social distancing, cafes and restaurants
       are packed. It’s like it never happened.
       [/quote]
       Same
       :yeah:
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page