URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bad Manners and Brimstone
  HTML https://badmanners.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Technoquette
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 26211--------------------------------------------------
       "Be grateful I'm photographing your home"
       By: TeamBhakta Date: February 18, 2019, 12:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The author of this Curbed piece had a MIL (boyfriend’s mother)
       living in a colorful row of homes popular with bloggers on
       Instagram. The MIL was resting after chemo one day & was
       disturbed by a noisy travel blogger doing a photo shoot outside.
       The MIL gave the travel blogger a look to knock it off. The
       blogger posted on Instagram that the home owner should open a
       "mimosa stand" for tourists; she has since removed the original
       caption & is hanging her hat on (paraphrasing) "My own parents
       both died of cancer." How do those of you living in photogenic /
       historic areas handle tourists who show up photographing your
       home ?
  HTML https://www.curbed.com/2019/2/6/18212179/instagram-famous-home-exteriors-architecture-travel-influencer-rules-homeownership
       #Post#: 26216--------------------------------------------------
       Re: "Be grateful I'm photographing your home"
       By: Aleko Date: February 18, 2019, 6:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think it's a pity that the author felt obliged to lay so much
       stress on the home-owner's distinguished career and family, her
       lovableness and her sufferings. If she had been a grumpy total
       nobody in robust health, she still would have been entitled to
       not be disturbed in her own home by someone shouting as they
       cavorted around taking tourist photos of it; and the only decent
       response to a householder coming to the door would be 'Oh, I'm
       sorry, did I disturb you? I didn't realise we were making that
       much noise; I do apologise! We were carried away by seeing your
       lovely house, but we'll go away now and stop bothering you.
       Sorry again!'
       (This is not only the only decent response; it's the smart one.
       A soft answer not only turneth away wrath; just occasionally it
       can beguile the owner into letting you carry on, and even maybe
       into letting you see a bit more of it.  ;D)
       #Post#: 26218--------------------------------------------------
       Re: "Be grateful I'm photographing your home"
       By: DCGirl Date: February 18, 2019, 7:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I do think it's all about the pictures these days, no matter
       what.  I jokingly refer to my niece's wedding as the Instagram
       wedding.  The site, a picturesque B&B on a farm, was chosen for
       the photo opportunities and not for the convenience of anyone,
       including the bride and groom.  When I saw the online photo
       album, there are (seriously) 20 times more pictures of the B&B
       owners' cute alpaca romping in the pasture than there are of me
       and my husband (we're in one group shot, period, and no
       candids).  As a result, people lose site of the real purpose of
       places and events -- that that picturesque house is someone's
       home and that one of the most important parts of a wedding is to
       celebrate with family and friends and not the local livestock.
       I know I posted about this on the old board, but my grandparents
       are buried at Arlington National Cemetery, within site of the
       grave of John F. Kennedy, which is a major tourist destination.
       My grandfather was there 11 years before JFK.  When we had my
       grandmother's funeral at the grave site, with a Navy chaplain
       and a young sailor carrying the urn with her ashes, we could
       hear the clicking of cameras as a tour group took pictures.
       This was long before cell phones and social media.  I was
       furious.  Did they think we were costumed re-enactors, like in
       Colonial Williamsburg, who were there for their entertainment?
       #Post#: 26346--------------------------------------------------
       Re: "Be grateful I'm photographing your home"
       By: Contrarian Date: February 19, 2019, 11:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I’m not in the US, so I will most likely be misunderstanding
       laws.
       There are prices to be paid in order to live in a free society.
       Some more annoying than others.  People are free to take
       pictures in public of your self and your property.
       Sometimes you can see it coming, like the people who bought and
       live in the house of “Amityville Horror”.
       I know the question is not if such things should be legal or
       not, but how to handle it when you’re in that situation but I
       just wanted to first state, as long as it is legal, it will keep
       happening.
       With a home, many people install plaques saying something like
       “we do not give tours, don’t knock at the door”, or they install
       some sort of gated system where one can’t even get to the door
       without being buzzed in.  But if you don’t and or are unable to
       do such things, you must be prepared to accept that you live in
       a highly photographed structure and you should probably make a
       comfortable, private space away from the main line of
       photography.
       I never sat in the living room of my old home, with the curtains
       open. I love sunlight, but the window was about eight feet from
       a busyish street and I didn’t like people looking in, or knowing
       I was home. It wasn’t a tourist attraction but that’s how I am.
       My comfy armchairs were in my kitchen, at the back of the house,
       where there were sliding doors and I’d sit there when I wanted
       to enjoy sunlight and a cup of tea.
       No room for a kitchen table unfortunately, but I had a little
       round bistro table. Anyway, point being, you should be able to
       sit in your front room with the window open, but clearly one
       can’t without being disturbed.
       I don’t think there is any answer to deal with the curious, the
       photocrazy, and the privacy vultures, that will end this. If
       they see you, they will call to you, we won’t be able to change
       them.
       I really think the only solution is to build a comfy private
       place elsewhere in the home.
       As for the Arlington cemetery, I completely understand the
       frustration and, (did I misread?) pain.  But society has
       demonstrably been insensitive of privacy since the beginning of
       cameras.  I’m sure long before camera’s.
       I can’t even imagine what these people were doing taking
       pictures at your loved ones service, but they are vultures and
       cannot be stopped.
       I think what I’m saying is this can’t really be dealt with,
       besides hiring security or hiding.
       #Post#: 26352--------------------------------------------------
       Re: "Be grateful I'm photographing your home"
       By: Sycorax Date: February 19, 2019, 12:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think the problem in this situation was that they weren't just
       taking photographs, they were spending an extended period of
       time shouting loudly about the photographs they were taking. I
       don't know if there are any laws about this, but I think it's
       pretty rude to just be loud in a residential area.  I doubt that
       this Instagrammer would be that excited to have someone randomly
       shouting in front of *their* residence.
       #Post#: 26357--------------------------------------------------
       Re: "Be grateful I'm photographing your home"
       By: Hmmm Date: February 19, 2019, 12:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Contrarian link=topic=999.msg26346#msg26346
       date=1550597287]
       I’m not in the US, so I will most likely be misunderstanding
       laws.
       There are prices to be paid in order to live in a free society.
       Some more annoying than others.  People are free to take
       pictures in public of your self and your property.
       Sometimes you can see it coming, like the people who bought and
       live in the house of “Amityville Horror”.
       I know the question is not if such things should be legal or
       not, but how to handle it when you’re in that situation but I
       just wanted to first state, as long as it is legal, it will keep
       happening.
       With a home, many people install plaques saying something like
       “we do not give tours, don’t knock at the door”, or they install
       some sort of gated system where one can’t even get to the door
       without being buzzed in.  But if you don’t and or are unable to
       do such things, you must be prepared to accept that you live in
       a highly photographed structure and you should probably make a
       comfortable, private space away from the main line of
       photography.
       I never sat in the living room of my old home, with the curtains
       open. I love sunlight, but the window was about eight feet from
       a busyish street and I didn’t like people looking in, or knowing
       I was home. It wasn’t a tourist attraction but that’s how I am.
       My comfy armchairs were in my kitchen, at the back of the house,
       where there were sliding doors and I’d sit there when I wanted
       to enjoy sunlight and a cup of tea.
       No room for a kitchen table unfortunately, but I had a little
       round bistro table. Anyway, point being, you should be able to
       sit in your front room with the window open, but clearly one
       can’t without being disturbed.
       I don’t think there is any answer to deal with the curious, the
       photocrazy, and the privacy vultures, that will end this. If
       they see you, they will call to you, we won’t be able to change
       them.
       I really think the only solution is to build a comfy private
       place elsewhere in the home.
       As for the Arlington cemetery, I completely understand the
       frustration and, (did I misread?) pain.  But society has
       demonstrably been insensitive of privacy since the beginning of
       cameras.  I’m sure long before camera’s.
       I can’t even imagine what these people were doing taking
       pictures at your loved ones service, but they are vultures and
       cannot be stopped.
       I think what I’m saying is this can’t really be dealt with,
       besides hiring security or hiding.
       [/quote]
       For me, legality and politeness are two separate things. It may
       be legal to stand on the sidewalk and take photos and yelling
       directions at someone across the street. But is it a polite
       thing to do? I refuse to "give in" to the notion that we just
       have to learn to live with people becoming less polite and
       respectful of others. Unless people are willing to challenge the
       behavior it will continue.
       For instance, had this been a  friend relating a story about the
       "old curmudgeon" glaring out the window, I would have asked how
       long had they been out there and how loud were they being to
       cause the confrontation.
       #Post#: 26367--------------------------------------------------
       Re: "Be grateful I'm photographing your home"
       By: Twik Date: February 19, 2019, 2:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't think you can control the behaviour of people on the
       sidewalk, unless they're doing something truly atrocious like
       using zoom lenses to capture the décor in your home. Its
       unfortunate if the house was built so that people on the
       sidewalk are an arm's length from being in your front hallway,
       but that's on the architect.
       It's certainly legal, but not polite, to cavort in front of
       people's homes in a way that would bring attention to yourself.
       I doubt that someone merely standing on the sidewalk and having
       their picture taken would cause much uproar, but if people are
       treating it like a fashion photoshoot I can see how it's
       annoying and distracting.
       It wasn't quite clear in the article about the original picture,
       but the writer mentions other situations where the public has
       actually ventured onto private property. That's not just rude,
       it's illegal, and I'd shed no tears if these people were
       arrested.
       #Post#: 26368--------------------------------------------------
       Re: "Be grateful I'm photographing your home"
       By: DCGirl Date: February 19, 2019, 2:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you read the article, the woman who's home it was was
       involved in the preservation of historic buildings in Savannah
       and probably more aware than most people that her home was
       something of a tourist attraction.  To me, the issue is not so
       much that someone was taking pictures of the home but that she
       was yelling to her photographer across the street (likely, very
       loud) and that she chose to be incredibly snotty in her original
       Instagram post about the owner of the home.  You can't stop
       someone from taking a picture of the front of your house, but
       the article that was linked also talks about how people go up
       onto the porches of those homes to get better pictures, which is
       clearly trespassing.  I think the distinction between legality
       and politeness in the previous response.
       I've lived in a major tourist destination.  I attended the
       College of William & Mary, which is in Williamsburg, VA, and the
       first floor of one of its buildings, the Wren Building, is part
       of Colonial Williamsburg (the Wren Building is the oldest
       academic building in continuous use in the United States).
       Classes are still offered in upper floors.  When I was there the
       classrooms were used by the English department, so I had several
       classes there in my four years.  I believe it's used by the
       Philosophy department now, but don't hold me to it.  Some
       students actually register for specific classes just to be able
       to say they took one class in the Wren Building during their
       four years there.  Anyway, it was not at all unusual to have
       tourists come up the stairs and occasionally try to take
       pictures of the rare denim-wearing sophomore in its native
       habitat, as it were.  My Old English professor had a death glare
       that would scare the daylights out of them if they walked into
       his classroom.
       #Post#: 26383--------------------------------------------------
       Re: "Be grateful I'm photographing your home"
       By: Rose Red Date: February 19, 2019, 3:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This reminds me of a program I once saw about owners of houses
       designed by Frank Lloyd Wright. They are forbidden to hang
       window treatments and they often have tourists/tours peering
       into their homes and taking pictures. But they knew what they
       were getting into before agreeing to buy the house(s). I could
       not live that way. No way, no how, no matter how beautiful the
       house. I don't want strangers watching me eat breakfast!
       For those who don't have such agreements, I'd set up motion
       sprinklers or something.
       #Post#: 26422--------------------------------------------------
       Re: "Be grateful I'm photographing your home"
       By: Chez Miriam Date: February 20, 2019, 4:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Rose Red link=topic=999.msg26383#msg26383
       date=1550611387]
       This reminds me of a program I once saw about owners of houses
       designed by Frank Lloyd Wright. They are forbidden to hang
       window treatments and they often have tourists/tours peering
       into their homes and taking pictures. But they knew what they
       were getting into before agreeing to buy the house(s). I could
       not live that way. No way, no how, no matter how beautiful the
       house. I don't want strangers watching me eat breakfast!
       For those who don't have such agreements, I'd set up motion
       sprinklers or something.
       [/quote]
       That makes me wonder whether the film you can apply to windows
       that essentially turns them into a one-way mirror would be
       allowed?
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page